Suppr超能文献

AMC/DCBA含片治疗咽喉痛的疗效:一项系统评价和荟萃分析。

Efficacy of AMC/DCBA lozenges for sore throat: A systematic review and meta-analysis.

作者信息

Weckmann Gesine, Hauptmann-Voß Anke, Baumeister Sebastian E, Klötzer Christine, Chenot Jean-François

机构信息

Department of General Practice, Institute for Community Medicine, University Medicine Greifswald, Germany.

Division of Epidemiology, Department of Sport and Health Sciences, Technical University of Munich, Germany.

出版信息

Int J Clin Pract. 2017 Oct;71(10). doi: 10.1111/ijcp.13002. Epub 2017 Sep 4.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Lozenges containing Amylmetacresol and 2,4-Dichlorobenzylalcohol (AMC/DCBA, eg Strepsils ) are marketed as a remedy for acute sore throat. This over-the-counter formulation has antiseptic and local anaesthetic qualities.

OBJECTIVES

The objective of this systematic review and meta-analysis is to evaluate the efficacy and safety of AMC/DCBA for the relief of pain associated with acute uncomplicated sore throat.

METHODS

A systematic review of Literature was conducted using databases Medline, Embase and Cochrane to identify randomised controlled trials comparing AMC/DCBA against placebo or alternative local treatment options for acute uncomplicated sore throat. An additional hand search was performed. Two reviewers independently assessed citations for relevance, inclusion criteria and risk of bias. Meta-analysis was performed on included trials and standardised mean differences (SMD; d ) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were calculated.

RESULTS

The literature search yielded 77 citations, 3 of which met the inclusion criteria. AMC/DCBA lozenges (0.6 mg Amylmetacresol, 1.2 mg 2, 4-Dichlorobenzylalcohol) were compared with unflavoured, non-medicated lozenges. The AMC/DCBA formulation additionally contained lidocaine in one and flavouring additives in another trial. A total of 660 adults participated in the included trials. Primary outcome was reduction in pain intensity against baseline, 2 hours after intervention compared with placebo group. Fixed effects meta-analysis resulted in a standardised mean difference in pain intensity of -0.6 (-0.75; -0.45) on an 11-point ordinal rating scale, favouring the AMC/DCBA lozenges. Secondary outcomes were sore throat relief, difficulty swallowing and throat numbness. No serious side effects were reported, whereas mild side effects like headache, cough, nasal congestion and irritation of the oral cavity, were reported in up to 16% of subjects in both groups. All included trials were sponsored by a manufacturer of AMC/DCBA containing lozenges.

CONCLUSIONS

Lozenges with AMC/DCBA can be a safe treatment option to relieve pain in patients with uncomplicated sore throat looking for local treatment options and valuing the modest additional effect compared with non-medicated lozenges. Registration: PROSPERO CRD42015008826.

摘要

背景

含戊间甲酚和2,4-二氯苄醇(AMC/DCBA,如司力舒含片)的含片作为治疗急性咽喉痛的药物上市。这种非处方制剂具有防腐和局部麻醉作用。

目的

本系统评价和荟萃分析的目的是评估AMC/DCBA缓解急性单纯性咽喉痛相关疼痛的疗效和安全性。

方法

通过检索Medline、Embase和Cochrane数据库对文献进行系统评价,以确定将AMC/DCBA与安慰剂或急性单纯性咽喉痛的其他局部治疗方案进行比较的随机对照试验。另外进行了手工检索。两名评价者独立评估文献的相关性、纳入标准和偏倚风险。对纳入的试验进行荟萃分析,并计算标准化均数差(SMD;d)及95%置信区间(CI)。

结果

文献检索得到77篇文献,其中3篇符合纳入标准。将含AMC/DCBA的含片(0.6mg戊间甲酚,1.2mg 2,4-二氯苄醇)与无味、无药物的含片进行比较。在一项试验中,AMC/DCBA制剂还含有利多卡因,在另一项试验中含有调味添加剂。共有660名成年人参与了纳入试验。主要结局是与安慰剂组相比,干预2小时后疼痛强度相对于基线的降低。固定效应荟萃分析得出,在11点序贯量表上疼痛强度的标准化均数差为-0.6(-0.75;-0.45),支持含AMC/DCBA的含片。次要结局包括咽喉痛缓解、吞咽困难和咽喉麻木。未报告严重副作用,而两组中高达16%的受试者报告有轻度副作用,如头痛、咳嗽、鼻塞和口腔刺激。所有纳入试验均由含AMC/DCBA含片的制造商赞助。

结论

对于寻求局部治疗方案且重视与无药物含片相比有适度额外效果的单纯性咽喉痛患者,含AMC/DCBA的含片可能是一种安全的缓解疼痛的治疗选择。注册号:PROSPERO CRD42015008826。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验