Cognitive Neurology and Alzheimer's Disease Center, Northwestern University Feinberg School of Medicine, Chicago, IL 60611, USA.
Neuropsychologia. 2012 Jul;50(8):1929-35. doi: 10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2012.04.017. Epub 2012 May 10.
This study evaluates spelling errors in the three subtypes of primary progressive aphasia (PPA): agrammatic (PPA-G), logopenic (PPA-L), and semantic (PPA-S). Forty-one PPA patients and 36 age-matched healthy controls were administered a test of spelling. The total number of errors and types of errors in spelling to dictation of regular words, exception words and nonwords, were recorded. Error types were classified based on phonetic plausibility. In the first analysis, scores were evaluated by clinical diagnosis. Errors in spelling exception words and phonetically plausible errors were seen in PPA-S. Conversely, PPA-G was associated with errors in nonword spelling and phonetically implausible errors. In the next analysis, spelling scores were correlated to other neuropsychological language test scores. Significant correlations were found between exception word spelling and measures of naming and single word comprehension. Nonword spelling correlated with tests of grammar and repetition. Global language measures did not correlate significantly with spelling scores, however. Cortical thickness analysis based on MRI showed that atrophy in several language regions of interest were correlated with spelling errors. Atrophy in the left supramarginal gyrus and inferior frontal gyrus (IFG) pars orbitalis correlated with errors in nonword spelling, while thinning in the left temporal pole and fusiform gyrus correlated with errors in exception word spelling. Additionally, phonetically implausible errors in regular word spelling correlated with thinning in the left IFG pars triangularis and pars opercularis. Together, these findings suggest two independent systems for spelling to dictation, one phonetic (phoneme to grapheme conversion), and one lexical (whole word retrieval).
本研究评估了三种原发性进行性失语症(PPA)亚型中的拼写错误:语法性(PPA-G)、词流畅性(PPA-L)和语义性(PPA-S)。41 名 PPA 患者和 36 名年龄匹配的健康对照组接受了拼写测试。记录了拼写常规词、异常词和非词听写的总错误数和错误类型。根据语音合理性对错误类型进行分类。在第一次分析中,根据临床诊断评估分数。在 PPA-S 中观察到异常词拼写和语音合理错误。相反,PPA-G 与非词拼写和语音不合理错误有关。在下一个分析中,拼写分数与其他神经心理学语言测试分数相关。异常词拼写与命名和单个单词理解的测量值显著相关。非词拼写与语法和重复测试相关。全局语言测量与拼写分数没有显著相关。然而,基于 MRI 的皮质厚度分析显示,几个语言感兴趣区域的萎缩与拼写错误相关。左侧缘上回和额下回(IFG)眶部的萎缩与非词拼写错误相关,而左侧颞极和梭状回的变薄与异常词拼写错误相关。此外,规则词拼写中的语音不合理错误与左侧 IFG 三角部和外侧部的变薄相关。综上所述,这些发现表明存在两个独立的听写拼写系统,一个是语音系统(音位到字符转换),另一个是词汇系统(整词检索)。