• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

前瞻性、随机评估腹腔镜技能的获得、维持和丧失。

Prospective, randomized assessment of the acquisition, maintenance, and loss of laparoscopic skills.

机构信息

School of Medicine, University College Cork, Cork, Ireland.

出版信息

Ann Surg. 2012 Aug;256(2):387-93. doi: 10.1097/SLA.0b013e318251f3d2.

DOI:10.1097/SLA.0b013e318251f3d2
PMID:22580935
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Laparoscopic skills are difficult to learn. We, therefore, assessed the factors involved in skill acquisition, maintenance, and loss in 2 prospective, randomized studies.

METHODS

In study 1, 24 laparoscopic novices were randomly assigned to a control condition who performed the laparoscopic assessment task; Massed condition who trained on virtual reality (VR) simulation during 1 day or Interval condition who had the same amount of VR training distributed over 3 consecutive days. All groups also completed a novel laparoscopic box-trainer task on 5 consecutive days. In study 2, 16 laparoscopic novices were randomly assigned to a Practice or a No-practice condition. All subjects were required to train on a VR simulation curriculum for the same duration and skill attainment level. The week after completion of training, subjects in the Practice condition were allowed 1 complete practice trial on the simulator. Both groups completed the same tasks 2 weeks after completion of the training.

RESULTS

In study 1, the Interval trained group showed the fastest rate of learning and on completion of training significantly outperformed both the Massed and Control groups (P < 0.0001). In study 2, both groups showed significant skills improvement from training trial T1 to T3 (P < 0.0001). The subjects in the Practice group maintained or improved their skills at 1 week but those in the No practice group showed significant decline of skills at 2 weeks after training completion (P < 0.0001).

CONCLUSIONS

Laparoscopic skills are optimally acquired on an Interval training schedule. They significantly decline with 2 weeks of nonuse.

摘要

背景

腹腔镜技能很难掌握。因此,我们在两项前瞻性、随机研究中评估了技能习得、维持和丧失的相关因素。

方法

在研究 1 中,24 名腹腔镜新手随机分配到对照组(进行腹腔镜评估任务)、密集组(在虚拟现实(VR)模拟上训练 1 天)或间隔组(在 3 天内完成相同数量的 VR 训练)。所有组还在连续 5 天内完成了一项新的腹腔镜箱式训练任务。在研究 2 中,16 名腹腔镜新手随机分配到练习或不练习条件。所有受试者都需要在 VR 模拟课程上接受相同的训练时长和技能习得水平。在完成培训后的一周,练习组的受试者被允许在模拟器上进行 1 次完整的练习试验。两组在完成培训后的 2 周内都完成了相同的任务。

结果

在研究 1 中,间隔训练组的学习速度最快,并且在完成培训后明显优于密集组和对照组(P < 0.0001)。在研究 2 中,两组在训练试验 T1 到 T3 期间均显示出显著的技能提高(P < 0.0001)。练习组的受试者在 1 周时保持或提高了他们的技能,但不练习组的受试者在培训完成后 2 周时技能显著下降(P < 0.0001)。

结论

腹腔镜技能通过间隔训练方案得到最佳习得。在 2 周的非使用后,它们会显著下降。

相似文献

1
Prospective, randomized assessment of the acquisition, maintenance, and loss of laparoscopic skills.前瞻性、随机评估腹腔镜技能的获得、维持和丧失。
Ann Surg. 2012 Aug;256(2):387-93. doi: 10.1097/SLA.0b013e318251f3d2.
2
Effectiveness of laparoscopic computer simulator versus usage of box trainer for endoscopic surgery training of novices.腹腔镜计算机模拟器与箱式训练器在新手内镜手术训练中的效果比较。
J Surg Educ. 2011 Jul-Aug;68(4):282-9. doi: 10.1016/j.jsurg.2011.02.007. Epub 2011 May 4.
3
Effect of Continuous Motion Parameter Feedback on Laparoscopic Simulation Training: A Prospective Randomized Controlled Trial on Skill Acquisition and Retention.连续运动参数反馈对腹腔镜模拟训练的影响:一项关于技能获取与保持的前瞻性随机对照试验
J Surg Educ. 2018 Mar-Apr;75(2):516-526. doi: 10.1016/j.jsurg.2017.08.015. Epub 2017 Aug 31.
4
Box- or Virtual-Reality Trainer: Which Tool Results in Better Transfer of Laparoscopic Basic Skills?-A Prospective Randomized Trial.箱式或虚拟现实训练器:哪种工具能带来更好的腹腔镜基本技能转移效果?——一项前瞻性随机试验。
J Surg Educ. 2017 Jul-Aug;74(4):724-735. doi: 10.1016/j.jsurg.2016.12.009. Epub 2017 Jan 13.
5
A comparison of 2 ex vivo training curricula for advanced laparoscopic skills: a randomized controlled trial.两种高级腹腔镜技能体外培训课程的比较:一项随机对照试验。
Ann Surg. 2012 May;255(5):833-9. doi: 10.1097/SLA.0b013e31824aca09.
6
A new virtual-reality training module for laparoscopic surgical skills and equipment handling: can multitasking be trained? A randomized controlled trial.一种用于腹腔镜手术技能和设备操作的新型虚拟现实训练模块:多任务处理能力能否得到训练?一项随机对照试验。
J Surg Educ. 2015 Mar-Apr;72(2):184-91. doi: 10.1016/j.jsurg.2014.09.004. Epub 2014 Oct 23.
7
Increasing efficiency of surgical training: effects of spacing practice on skill acquisition and retention in laparoscopy training.提高外科手术训练效率:间隔练习对腹腔镜训练中技能习得与保持的影响
Surg Endosc. 2015 Aug;29(8):2235-43. doi: 10.1007/s00464-014-3931-x. Epub 2014 Oct 16.
8
Convergent validation and transfer of learning studies of a virtual reality-based pattern cutting simulator.基于虚拟现实的裁剪模拟样片的融合验证和学习迁移研究。
Surg Endosc. 2018 Mar;32(3):1265-1272. doi: 10.1007/s00464-017-5802-8. Epub 2017 Aug 15.
9
Training With Curved Laparoscopic Instruments in Single-Port Setting Improves Performance Using Straight Instruments: A Prospective Randomized Simulation Study.单孔环境下使用弯曲腹腔镜器械训练可提高使用直器械的操作性能:一项前瞻性随机模拟研究。
J Surg Educ. 2016 Mar-Apr;73(2):348-54. doi: 10.1016/j.jsurg.2015.10.013.
10
Acquisition and retention of laparoscopic skills is different comparing conventional laparoscopic and single-incision laparoscopic surgery: a single-centre, prospective randomized study.与传统腹腔镜手术和单孔腹腔镜手术相比,腹腔镜技术的掌握与保持存在差异:一项单中心前瞻性随机研究。
Surg Endosc. 2016 Aug;30(8):3386-90. doi: 10.1007/s00464-015-4619-6. Epub 2015 Oct 28.

引用本文的文献

1
Surgery and technical skill decay.手术及技术技能衰退。
Int J Surg. 2025 May 1;111(5):3399-3413. doi: 10.1097/JS9.0000000000002313.
2
EEG connectivity and BDNF correlates of fast motor learning in laparoscopic surgery.脑电图连接性与脑源性神经营养因子与腹腔镜手术中快速运动学习的相关性
Sci Rep. 2025 Mar 3;15(1):7399. doi: 10.1038/s41598-025-89261-0.
3
Distributed training vs. massed practice for surgical skills training-a systematic review.手术技能训练中的分布式训练与集中练习——一项系统综述
Surg Endosc. 2025 Jan;39(1):39-63. doi: 10.1007/s00464-024-11408-3. Epub 2024 Nov 25.
4
Cesena guidelines: WSES consensus statement on laparoscopic-first approach to general surgery emergencies and abdominal trauma.切塞纳指南:WSES 关于普通外科急症和腹部创伤腹腔镜优先方法的共识声明。
World J Emerg Surg. 2023 Dec 8;18(1):57. doi: 10.1186/s13017-023-00520-9.
5
No difference between using short and long intervals for distributed proficiency-based laparoscopy simulator training: a randomized trial.短间隔和长间隔分布式基于能力的腹腔镜模拟训练之间无差异:一项随机试验。
Surg Endosc. 2024 Jan;38(1):300-305. doi: 10.1007/s00464-023-10522-y. Epub 2023 Nov 22.
6
Comparing proficiency of obstetrics and gynaecology trainees with general surgery trainees using simulated laparoscopic tasks in Health Education England, North-West: a prospective observational study.比较英国健康与教育署西北分部使用模拟腹腔镜任务的妇产科受训者和普通外科受训者的熟练度:一项前瞻性观察研究。
BMJ Open. 2023 Nov 10;13(11):e075113. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2023-075113.
7
Towards best practice in developing motor skills: a systematic review on spacing in VR simulator-based psychomotor training for surgical novices.朝向发展运动技能的最佳实践:虚拟现实模拟器为基础的新手手术心理运动训练中空间分隔的系统评价。
BMC Med Educ. 2023 Mar 13;23(1):154. doi: 10.1186/s12909-023-04046-1.
8
Training curriculum in minimally invasive emergency digestive surgery: 2022 WSES position paper.微创急诊消化外科学培训课程:2022 WSES 立场文件。
World J Emerg Surg. 2023 Jan 27;18(1):11. doi: 10.1186/s13017-023-00476-w.
9
Prospective comparison of single encounter versus distributed laparoscopic training in novice learners: A controlled trial.新手学习者单次集中与分布式腹腔镜培训的前瞻性比较:一项对照试验。
J Educ Health Promot. 2022 Apr 28;11:116. doi: 10.4103/jehp.jehp_825_21. eCollection 2022.
10
Prospective, randomised and blinded comparison of proficiency-based progression full-physics virtual reality simulator training versus invasive vascular experience for learning carotid artery angiography by very experienced operators.经验丰富的操作人员通过基于熟练程度的进阶全物理虚拟现实模拟器训练与侵入性血管造影经验来学习颈动脉血管造影的前瞻性、随机和盲法比较。
BMJ Simul Technol Enhanc Learn. 2016 Feb 8;2(1):1-5. doi: 10.1136/bmjstel-2015-000090. eCollection 2016.