• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

不表扬是表扬吗?积极反馈对儿童和大学生后续失败反应的影响。

Is no praise good praise? Effects of positive feedback on children's and university students' responses to subsequent failures.

机构信息

School of Psychology, University of Kent, Canterbury, UK.

出版信息

Br J Educ Psychol. 2012 Jun;82(Pt 2):327-39. doi: 10.1111/j.2044-8279.2011.02028.x. Epub 2011 Apr 8.

DOI:10.1111/j.2044-8279.2011.02028.x
PMID:22583094
Abstract

BACKGROUND

According to Dweck and colleagues, praise can be delivered using person ('you are clever') or process terms ('you worked hard'). Research suggests that giving people process praise after success can help them deal better with subsequent failures because it attributes outcomes to effort rather than fixed ability. However, research has thus far inadequately addressed how these types of praise compare to receiving no evaluative feedback.

AIM

The aim of the present research was to examine the effects of person and process praise compared to a control group where only objective outcome feedback was given.

SAMPLES

In Study 1, 145 British school children aged 9-11 years took part. In Study 2, participants were 114 British university students.

METHOD

In both studies, participants read three scenarios and were asked to imagine themselves as the main character. In each scenario, they succeeded in an educational task and received either person, process, or no praise. Participants then read two scenarios, where they failed at a task. Following each scenario participants evaluated their performance, affect, and persistence.

RESULTS

After one failure, participants who received person praise reacted most negatively on all dependent measures. However, those in the process condition did not differ significantly from those in the control group.

CONCLUSIONS

These findings suggest that process feedback may not be inherently positive; instead person feedback seems particularly detrimental.

摘要

背景

根据德韦克(Dweck)及其同事的观点,表扬可以通过个人(“你很聪明”)或过程(“你很努力”)术语来表达。研究表明,在成功后给予人们过程上的表扬可以帮助他们更好地应对随后的失败,因为这将结果归因于努力而非固定的能力。然而,到目前为止,研究还没有充分探讨这些类型的表扬与不给予评价反馈相比有何不同。

目的

本研究旨在考察与仅给予客观结果反馈的对照组相比,个人表扬和过程表扬的效果。

样本

在研究 1 中,145 名 9-11 岁的英国学童参加了研究;在研究 2 中,114 名英国大学生参加了研究。

方法

在两项研究中,参与者阅读了三个情景,并被要求想象自己是主要角色。在每个情景中,他们在教育任务中取得了成功,并收到了个人表扬、过程表扬或没有表扬。然后,参与者阅读了两个他们在任务中失败的情景。在每个情景之后,参与者评估了他们的表现、情感和坚持度。

结果

在一次失败后,收到个人表扬的参与者在所有依赖测量上的反应最为负面。然而,过程条件下的参与者与对照组没有显著差异。

结论

这些发现表明,过程反馈可能不是内在积极的;相反,个人反馈似乎特别不利。

相似文献

1
Is no praise good praise? Effects of positive feedback on children's and university students' responses to subsequent failures.不表扬是表扬吗?积极反馈对儿童和大学生后续失败反应的影响。
Br J Educ Psychol. 2012 Jun;82(Pt 2):327-39. doi: 10.1111/j.2044-8279.2011.02028.x. Epub 2011 Apr 8.
2
The influence of teacher feedback on children's perceptions of student-teacher relationships.教师反馈对儿童对师生关系认知的影响。
Br J Educ Psychol. 2015 Sep;85(3):276-88. doi: 10.1111/bjep.12070. Epub 2015 Apr 6.
3
Paradoxical effects of praise and criticism: social, dimensional and temporal comparisons.表扬与批评的矛盾效应:社会、维度和时间比较
Br J Educ Psychol. 2005 Jun;75(Pt 2):275-95. doi: 10.1348/000709904X24744.
4
Effects of praise and "easy" feedback on children's persistence and self-evaluations.表扬和“简单”反馈对儿童坚持性和自我评价的影响。
J Exp Child Psychol. 2024 Nov;247:106032. doi: 10.1016/j.jecp.2024.106032. Epub 2024 Aug 6.
5
The roles of praise and social comparison information in the experience of pride.表扬和社会比较信息在自豪体验中的作用。
J Soc Psychol. 2003 Apr;143(2):209-32. doi: 10.1080/00224540309598441.
6
"Good job, you're so smart": The effects of inconsistency of praise type on young children's motivation.“干得好,你真聪明”:赞扬类型不一致对幼儿动机的影响。
J Exp Child Psychol. 2010 Oct;107(2):155-63. doi: 10.1016/j.jecp.2010.04.015. Epub 2010 Jun 8.
7
Effort as Person-Focused Praise: "Hard Worker" Has Negative Effects for Adults After a Failure.将努力作为以人为主的赞扬:“努力工作者”在失败后对成年人有负面影响。
J Genet Psychol. 2018 May-Jun;179(3):117-122. doi: 10.1080/00221325.2018.1441801. Epub 2018 Mar 13.
8
Goal regulation across time: the effects of feedback and affect.随时间变化的目标调节:反馈与情感的影响。
J Appl Psychol. 2005 May;90(3):453-67. doi: 10.1037/0021-9010.90.3.453.
9
Examining teachers' ratings of feedback following success and failure: a study of Chinese English teachers.考察教师在成功和失败后对反馈的评价:一项对中国英语教师的研究。
Br J Educ Psychol. 2019 Dec;89(4):804-817. doi: 10.1111/bjep.12261. Epub 2019 Feb 8.
10
Does priming for mastery goals improve the performance of students with an entity view of ability?为掌握目标进行启动是否能提高具有能力实体观的学生的表现?
Br J Educ Psychol. 2005 Sep;75(Pt 3):391-409. doi: 10.1348/000709904X22700.

引用本文的文献

1
Eye of the beholder: Neural synchrony of dynamically changing relations between parent praise and child affect.观察者之眼:父母赞扬与儿童情感之间动态变化关系的神经同步性。
Dev Sci. 2024 Nov;27(6):e13541. doi: 10.1111/desc.13541. Epub 2024 Jul 3.
2
The Difference an Explanation Makes: Verbal Debrief Effects When Children Cope with Uncertainty.解释所起的作用:儿童应对不确定性时的言语汇报效果
Cogn Dev. 2023 Apr-Jun;66. doi: 10.1016/j.cogdev.2023.101317. Epub 2023 Mar 7.
3
Feedback in Music Performance Teaching.音乐表演教学中的反馈
Front Psychol. 2022 Jun 20;13:891025. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2022.891025. eCollection 2022.
4
Effects of Attribute Affirmation and Achievement Goals on High School Students' Motivation.属性肯定和成就目标对高中生动机的影响。
Front Psychol. 2021 Aug 24;12:661668. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2021.661668. eCollection 2021.
5
The Negative Effect of Ability-Focused Praise on the "Praiser's" Intrinsic Motivation: Face-to-Face Interaction.以能力为导向的表扬对“表扬者”内在动机的负面影响:面对面互动
Front Psychol. 2020 Nov 24;11:562081. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2020.562081. eCollection 2020.
6
Grade-Level Differences in Teacher Feedback and Students' Self-Regulated Learning.教师反馈与学生自我调节学习中的年级差异。
Front Psychol. 2020 May 5;11:783. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2020.00783. eCollection 2020.
7
Influences Of Different Dimensions Of Academic Self-Concept On Students' Cardiac Recovery After Giving A Stressful Presentation.不同维度的学业自我概念对学生在进行压力性演讲后心脏恢复的影响。
Psychol Res Behav Manag. 2019 Nov 7;12:1031-1040. doi: 10.2147/PRBM.S219784. eCollection 2019.
8
Effects of Ability and Effort Praise on Children's Failure Attribution, Self-Handicapping, and Performance.能力与努力表扬对儿童失败归因、自我妨碍及表现的影响。
Front Psychol. 2018 Oct 2;9:1883. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2018.01883. eCollection 2018.
9
Teacher Mindsets Concerning the Malleability of Intelligence and the Appraisal of Achievement in the Context of Feedback.教师在反馈背景下对智力可塑性及成就评价的思维模式。
Front Psychol. 2017 Sep 21;8:1594. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2017.01594. eCollection 2017.