Hentschel Maren, Averbeck Bruno B, Lange-Küttner Christiane
University of Bremen.
National Institutes of Health and Mental Health (NIH/NIMH), Bethesda, USA.
Cogn Dev. 2023 Apr-Jun;66. doi: 10.1016/j.cogdev.2023.101317. Epub 2023 Mar 7.
Previous research showed that uncertain, stochastic feedback drastically reduces children's performance. Here, 145 children from 7 to 11 years learned sets of sequences of four left-right button presses, each press followed by a red/green signal. After each of the 15% randomly false feedback trials, children received a verbal debrief that it was either (1) a mistake, or (2) a lie, or (3) received a reassuring comment for 85% correct trials. The control group received no verbal debrief. In the stochastic condition children reflected more on previous trials than with 100% correct feedback. Verbal debriefs helped children to overcome the deterioration of the first two repetitions. Mistakes were discarded and therefore the most helpful comment. Lie debriefs yielded the most reflection on previous experience. Reassurance comments were not quite as efficient.
先前的研究表明,不确定的随机反馈会大幅降低儿童的表现。在此,145名7至11岁的儿童学习了由四个左右按钮按压组成的序列集,每次按压后会出现红色/绿色信号。在15%的随机错误反馈试验中的每一次之后,孩子们会收到一次口头解释,说明这要么是(1)一个错误,要么是(2)一个谎言,要么在85%的正确试验中收到一条安慰性的评论。对照组没有收到口头解释。在随机条件下,与100%正确反馈相比,孩子们对先前试验的反思更多。口头解释帮助孩子们克服了前两次重复时表现的恶化。错误被摒弃,因此是最有帮助的评论。谎言解释引发了对先前经历最多的反思。安慰性评论的效果不太理想。