• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

采用基因表达谱检测与乳腺癌女性化疗应用的关联。

Adoption of gene expression profile testing and association with use of chemotherapy among women with breast cancer.

机构信息

Center for Outcomes and Policy Research, Department of Medical Oncology, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, 450 Brookline Ave, Boston, MA 02215, USA.

出版信息

J Clin Oncol. 2012 Jun 20;30(18):2218-26. doi: 10.1200/JCO.2011.38.5740. Epub 2012 May 14.

DOI:10.1200/JCO.2011.38.5740
PMID:22585699
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC3397718/
Abstract

PURPOSE

Gene expression profile (GEP) testing is a relatively new technology that offers the potential of personalized medicine to patients, yet little is known about its adoption into routine practice. One of the first commercially available GEP tests, a 21-gene profile, was developed to estimate the benefit of adjuvant chemotherapy for hormone receptor-positive breast cancer (HR-positive BC).

PATIENTS AND METHODS

By using a prospective registry data set outlining the routine care provided to women diagnosed from 2006 to 2008 with HR-positive BC at 17 comprehensive and community-based cancer centers, we assessed GEP test adoption and the association between testing and chemotherapy use.

RESULTS

Of 7,375 women, 20.4% had GEP testing and 50.2% received chemotherapy. Over time, testing increased (14.7% in 2006 to 27.5% in 2008; P < .01) and use of chemotherapy decreased (53.9% in 2006 to 47.0% in 2008; P < .01). Characteristics independently associated with lower odds of testing included African American versus white race (odds ratio [OR], 0.70; 95% CI, 0.54 to 0.92) and high school or less versus more than high school education (OR, 0.63; 95% CI, 0.52 to 0.76). Overall, testing was associated with lower odds of chemotherapy use (OR, 0.70; 95% CI, 0.62 to 0.80). Stratified analyses demonstrated that for small, node-negative cancers, testing was associated with higher odds of chemotherapy use (OR, 11.13; 95% CI, 5.39 to 22.99), whereas for node-positive and large node-negative cancers, testing was associated with lower odds of chemotherapy use (OR, 0.11; 95% CI, 0.07 to 0.17).

CONCLUSION

There has been a progressive increase in use of this GEP test and an associated shift in the characteristics of and overall reduction in the proportion of women with HR-positive BC receiving adjuvant chemotherapy.

摘要

目的

基因表达谱(GEP)检测是一种相对较新的技术,为患者提供了个性化医疗的潜力,但人们对其在常规实践中的应用知之甚少。最早商业化的 GEP 测试之一是 21 基因检测,用于估计激素受体阳性乳腺癌(HR 阳性 BC)辅助化疗的益处。

患者和方法

我们使用前瞻性登记数据集,概述了 2006 年至 2008 年间在 17 个综合性和社区癌症中心诊断出 HR 阳性 BC 的女性接受的常规治疗,评估了 GEP 检测的采用情况以及检测与化疗使用之间的关联。

结果

在 7375 名女性中,20.4%接受了 GEP 检测,50.2%接受了化疗。随着时间的推移,检测的使用有所增加(2006 年为 14.7%,2008 年为 27.5%;P<0.01),化疗的使用减少(2006 年为 53.9%,2008 年为 47.0%;P<0.01)。与检测几率较低独立相关的特征包括非裔美国人与白人种族(比值比[OR],0.70;95%可信区间,0.54 至 0.92)和高中或以下学历与高中学历以上(OR,0.63;95%可信区间,0.52 至 0.76)。总体而言,检测与化疗使用几率较低相关(OR,0.70;95%可信区间,0.62 至 0.80)。分层分析表明,对于小的、淋巴结阴性的癌症,检测与化疗使用的几率增加相关(OR,11.13;95%可信区间,5.39 至 22.99),而对于淋巴结阳性和大的淋巴结阴性癌症,检测与化疗使用的几率降低相关(OR,0.11;95%可信区间,0.07 至 0.17)。

结论

该 GEP 检测的使用逐渐增加,与接受辅助化疗的 HR 阳性 BC 女性的特征变化和总体比例降低相关。

相似文献

1
Adoption of gene expression profile testing and association with use of chemotherapy among women with breast cancer.采用基因表达谱检测与乳腺癌女性化疗应用的关联。
J Clin Oncol. 2012 Jun 20;30(18):2218-26. doi: 10.1200/JCO.2011.38.5740. Epub 2012 May 14.
2
Underutilization of gene expression profiling for early-stage breast cancer in California.加利福尼亚州早期乳腺癌基因表达谱检测的利用不足情况。
Cancer Causes Control. 2016 Jun;27(6):721-7. doi: 10.1007/s10552-016-0743-4. Epub 2016 Apr 20.
3
Influence of provider factors and race on uptake of breast cancer gene expression profiling.提供者因素和种族对乳腺癌基因表达谱检测的影响。
Cancer. 2018 Apr 15;124(8):1743-1751. doi: 10.1002/cncr.31222. Epub 2018 Jan 16.
4
Population-based study of the effect of gene expression profiling on adjuvant chemotherapy use in breast cancer patients under the age of 65 years.基于人群的基因表达谱分析对65岁以下乳腺癌患者辅助化疗使用情况影响的研究。
Cancer. 2015 Nov 15;121(22):4062-70. doi: 10.1002/cncr.29621. Epub 2015 Aug 20.
5
Racial Variation in the Uptake of Oncotype DX Testing for Early-Stage Breast Cancer.早期乳腺癌Oncotype DX检测应用中的种族差异。
J Clin Oncol. 2016 Jan 10;34(2):130-8. doi: 10.1200/JCO.2015.63.2489. Epub 2015 Nov 23.
6
Gene expression profile testing for breast cancer and the use of chemotherapy, serious adverse effects, and costs of care.乳腺癌基因表达谱检测与化疗的应用、严重不良反应以及医疗费用。
Breast Cancer Res Treat. 2011 Nov;130(2):619-26. doi: 10.1007/s10549-011-1628-6. Epub 2011 Jun 17.
7
A cost-consequence model of using the 21-gene assay to identify patients with early-stage node-positive breast cancer who benefit from adjuvant chemotherapy in the Netherlands.使用 21 基因检测来识别荷兰早期淋巴结阳性乳腺癌患者中从辅助化疗中获益的患者的成本-后果模型。
J Med Econ. 2024 Jan-Dec;27(1):445-454. doi: 10.1080/13696998.2024.2324612. Epub 2024 Mar 12.
8
Efficacy of systemic adjuvant therapy for breast cancer in African-American and Caucasian women.非裔美国女性和白人女性乳腺癌全身辅助治疗的疗效
J Natl Cancer Inst Monogr. 2001(30):36-43. doi: 10.1093/oxfordjournals.jncimonographs.a003458.
9
Racial disparities in omission of oncotype DX but no racial disparities in chemotherapy receipt following completed oncotype DX test results.种族差异导致省略 Oncotype DX 检测,但在完成 Oncotype DX 检测结果后,种族差异并不影响接受化疗。
Breast Cancer Res Treat. 2018 Feb;168(1):207-220. doi: 10.1007/s10549-017-4587-8. Epub 2017 Nov 27.
10
Endocrine therapy initiation, discontinuation and adherence and breast imaging among 21-gene recurrence score assay-eligible women under age 65.65岁以下符合21基因复发评分检测条件的女性的内分泌治疗起始、中断、依从性及乳腺成像情况
Breast Cancer Res. 2017 Mar 31;19(1):45. doi: 10.1186/s13058-017-0837-2.

引用本文的文献

1
Prognosis, treatment decision-making and value: A qualitative exploration of the emerging role of breast cancer prognostic assays.预后、治疗决策与价值:对乳腺癌预后检测新作用的定性探索
PLoS One. 2025 Jul 18;20(7):e0322509. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0322509. eCollection 2025.
2
Socioeconomic Disparities in Breast Cancer Survival: Examining Potential Mediator Role of Oncotype DX(ODX) Test and Stage at Diagnosis Among HR+/HER2- Breast Cancer Women.乳腺癌生存中的社会经济差异:探究HR+/HER2-型乳腺癌女性中Oncotype DX(ODX)检测及诊断分期的潜在中介作用
Cancers (Basel). 2025 May 28;17(11):1802. doi: 10.3390/cancers17111802.
3
The Utility of the Oncotype DX Test for Breast Cancer Patients in an Australian Multidisciplinary Setting.澳大利亚多学科环境下,Oncotype DX 测试在乳腺癌患者中的应用。
Breast J. 2022 Jan 31;2022:1199245. doi: 10.1155/2022/1199245. eCollection 2022.
4
Application of the 21-Gene Recurrence Score in Patients with Early HR-Positive/HER2-Negative Breast Cancer: Chemotherapy and Survival Rate According to Clinical Risk.21基因复发评分在早期激素受体阳性/人表皮生长因子受体2阴性乳腺癌患者中的应用:根据临床风险评估的化疗与生存率
Cancers (Basel). 2021 Aug 9;13(16):4003. doi: 10.3390/cancers13164003.
5
Current developments in delivering customized care: a scoping review.目前提供定制化护理的发展:范围综述。
BMC Health Serv Res. 2021 Jun 13;21(1):575. doi: 10.1186/s12913-021-06576-0.
6
Cost-effectiveness analyses demonstrate that observation is superior to sentinel lymph node biopsy for postmenopausal women with HR + breast cancer and negative axillary ultrasound.成本效益分析表明,对于 HR+乳腺癌且腋窝超声阴性的绝经后妇女,观察优于前哨淋巴结活检。
Breast Cancer Res Treat. 2020 Sep;183(2):251-262. doi: 10.1007/s10549-020-05768-2. Epub 2020 Jul 10.
7
Question Prompt List to Support Patient-Provider Communication in the Use of the 21-Gene Recurrence Test: Feasibility, Acceptability, and Outcomes.问题提示清单在支持患者-提供者沟通使用 21 基因复发试验中的作用:可行性、可接受性和结果。
JCO Oncol Pract. 2020 Oct;16(10):e1085-e1097. doi: 10.1200/JOP.19.00661. Epub 2020 May 28.
8
Trend and survival benefit of Oncotype DX use among female hormone receptor-positive breast cancer patients in 17 SEER registries, 2004-2015.17 个 SEER 数据库中 2004-2015 年激素受体阳性乳腺癌女性患者 Oncotype DX 使用的趋势和生存获益。
Breast Cancer Res Treat. 2020 Apr;180(2):491-501. doi: 10.1007/s10549-020-05557-x. Epub 2020 Feb 14.
9
Prognostic Impact of the 21-Gene Recurrence Score Assay Among Young Women With Node-Negative and Node-Positive ER-Positive/HER2-Negative Breast Cancer.21基因复发评分检测对激素受体阳性/人表皮生长因子受体2阴性、腋窝淋巴结阴性和阳性的年轻乳腺癌患者的预后影响
J Clin Oncol. 2020 Mar 1;38(7):725-733. doi: 10.1200/JCO.19.01959. Epub 2019 Dec 6.
10
A Value of Information Analysis of Research on the 21-Gene Assay for Breast Cancer Management.基于信息价值的乳腺癌管理 21 基因检测研究分析。
Value Health. 2019 Oct;22(10):1102-1110. doi: 10.1016/j.jval.2019.05.004. Epub 2019 Aug 7.

本文引用的文献

1
Invasive breast cancer.浸润性乳腺癌。
J Natl Compr Canc Netw. 2011 Feb;9(2):136-222. doi: 10.6004/jnccn.2011.0016.
2
The effects of oncotype DX recurrence scores on chemotherapy utilization in a multi-institutional breast cancer cohort.Oncotype DX 复发评分对多机构乳腺癌队列中化疗应用的影响。
Breast Cancer Res Treat. 2011 Apr;126(3):797-802. doi: 10.1007/s10549-010-1329-6. Epub 2011 Jan 1.
3
Ready or not: personal tumor profiling tests take off.无论准备好与否:个人肿瘤基因检测开始兴起。
J Natl Cancer Inst. 2011 Jan 19;103(2):84-6. doi: 10.1093/jnci/djq556. Epub 2010 Dec 29.
4
Utility of oncotype DX risk estimates in clinically intermediate risk hormone receptor-positive, HER2-normal, grade II, lymph node-negative breast cancers.Oncotype DX 风险评估在临床中激素受体阳性、HER2 阴性、组织学分级 II 级、淋巴结阴性的乳腺癌的应用。
Cancer. 2010 Nov 15;116(22):5161-7. doi: 10.1002/cncr.25269.
5
Cancer statistics, 2010.癌症统计数据,2010 年。
CA Cancer J Clin. 2010 Sep-Oct;60(5):277-300. doi: 10.3322/caac.20073. Epub 2010 Jul 7.
6
Clinical relevance of microsatellite instability in colorectal cancer.结直肠癌中微卫星不稳定性的临床相关性。
J Clin Oncol. 2010 Jul 10;28(20):3380-7. doi: 10.1200/JCO.2009.27.0652. Epub 2010 Jun 1.
7
Cost-effectiveness analysis of recurrence score-guided treatment using a 21-gene assay in early breast cancer.早期乳腺癌中 21 基因检测复发评分指导治疗的成本效果分析。
Oncologist. 2010;15(5):457-65. doi: 10.1634/theoncologist.2009-0275. Epub 2010 Apr 26.
8
Prospective multicenter study of the impact of the 21-gene recurrence score assay on medical oncologist and patient adjuvant breast cancer treatment selection.前瞻性多中心研究 21 基因复发评分检测对肿瘤内科医生和患者选择辅助乳腺癌治疗的影响。
J Clin Oncol. 2010 Apr 1;28(10):1671-6. doi: 10.1200/JCO.2008.20.2119. Epub 2010 Jan 11.
9
Prognostic and predictive value of the 21-gene recurrence score assay in postmenopausal women with node-positive, oestrogen-receptor-positive breast cancer on chemotherapy: a retrospective analysis of a randomised trial.21 基因复发评分检测在化疗后淋巴结阳性、雌激素受体阳性乳腺癌绝经后妇女中的预后和预测价值:一项随机试验的回顾性分析。
Lancet Oncol. 2010 Jan;11(1):55-65. doi: 10.1016/S1470-2045(09)70314-6. Epub 2009 Dec 10.
10
Economic analysis of gene expression profile data to guide adjuvant treatment in women with early-stage breast cancer.基因表达谱数据的经济分析以指导早期乳腺癌女性的辅助治疗。
Cancer Invest. 2009 Dec;27(10):953-9. doi: 10.3109/07357900903275217.