• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

相似文献

1
Gene expression profile testing for breast cancer and the use of chemotherapy, serious adverse effects, and costs of care.乳腺癌基因表达谱检测与化疗的应用、严重不良反应以及医疗费用。
Breast Cancer Res Treat. 2011 Nov;130(2):619-26. doi: 10.1007/s10549-011-1628-6. Epub 2011 Jun 17.
2
The impact of gene expression profile testing on confidence in chemotherapy decisions and prognostic expectations.基因表达谱检测对化疗决策信心和预后预期的影响。
Breast Cancer Res Treat. 2019 Jan;173(2):417-427. doi: 10.1007/s10549-018-4988-3. Epub 2018 Oct 10.
3
How do women trade-off benefits and risks in chemotherapy treatment decisions based on gene expression profiling for early-stage breast cancer? A discrete choice experiment.基于早期乳腺癌基因表达谱的化疗治疗决策中,女性如何权衡收益与风险?一项离散选择实验。
BMJ Open. 2016 Jun 2;6(6):e010981. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2015-010981.
4
Real-world economic value of a 21-gene assay in early-stage breast cancer.早期乳腺癌 21 基因检测的实际经济价值。
Am J Manag Care. 2017 Dec 1;23(12):e416-e420.
5
Population-based study of the effect of gene expression profiling on adjuvant chemotherapy use in breast cancer patients under the age of 65 years.基于人群的基因表达谱分析对65岁以下乳腺癌患者辅助化疗使用情况影响的研究。
Cancer. 2015 Nov 15;121(22):4062-70. doi: 10.1002/cncr.29621. Epub 2015 Aug 20.
6
The influence of gene expression profiling on decisional conflict in decision making for early-stage breast cancer chemotherapy.基因表达谱分析对早期乳腺癌化疗决策中决策冲突的影响。
Eur J Cancer. 2016 Jul;61:85-93. doi: 10.1016/j.ejca.2016.03.077. Epub 2016 May 4.
7
Adoption of gene expression profile testing and association with use of chemotherapy among women with breast cancer.采用基因表达谱检测与乳腺癌女性化疗应用的关联。
J Clin Oncol. 2012 Jun 20;30(18):2218-26. doi: 10.1200/JCO.2011.38.5740. Epub 2012 May 14.
8
Genomic testing and therapies for breast cancer in clinical practice.临床实践中的乳腺癌基因组检测与治疗。
Am J Manag Care. 2011 May 1;17(5 Spec No):e174-81.
9
Impact of gene-expression profiling in patients with early breast cancer when applied outside the guideline directed indication area.基因表达谱分析在早期乳腺癌患者中应用于指南指导适应症范围之外时的影响。
Eur J Cancer. 2017 Oct;84:270-277. doi: 10.1016/j.ejca.2017.07.042. Epub 2017 Aug 24.
10
Development of a method to determine the cost of breast cancer treatment with chemotherapy at Groote Schuur Hospital, Cape Town, South Africa.开发一种方法来确定南非开普敦格罗特舒尔医院乳腺癌化疗治疗的成本。
S Afr Med J. 2020 Mar 30;110(4):296-301. doi: 10.7196/SAMJ.2020.v110i4.14204.

引用本文的文献

1
Licochalcone H Induces Cell Cycle Arrest and Apoptosis in Human Skin Cancer Cells by Modulating JAK2/STAT3 Signaling.甘草查耳酮H通过调节JAK2/STAT3信号通路诱导人皮肤癌细胞的细胞周期阻滞和凋亡。
Biomol Ther (Seoul). 2022 Jan 1;30(1):72-79. doi: 10.4062/biomolther.2021.149.
2
21-gene recurrence assay in patients receiving intraoperative radiotherapy: are "favorable" characteristics a surrogate for low recurrence?接受术中放疗患者的21基因复发检测:“有利”特征是否是低复发的替代指标?
Gland Surg. 2017 Dec;6(6):675-681. doi: 10.21037/gs.2017.07.05.
3
Underutilization of gene expression profiling for early-stage breast cancer in California.加利福尼亚州早期乳腺癌基因表达谱检测的利用不足情况。
Cancer Causes Control. 2016 Jun;27(6):721-7. doi: 10.1007/s10552-016-0743-4. Epub 2016 Apr 20.
4
The value of multigene predictors of clinical outcome in breast cancer: an analysis of the evidence.乳腺癌临床结局多基因预测指标的价值:证据分析
Expert Rev Mol Diagn. 2015 Feb;15(2):277-86. doi: 10.1586/14737159.2015.983476. Epub 2014 Dec 5.
5
Tissue biomarkers of breast cancer and their association with conventional pathologic features.乳腺癌的组织生物标志物及其与常规病理特征的关系。
Br J Cancer. 2013 Feb 5;108(2):351-60. doi: 10.1038/bjc.2012.552. Epub 2013 Jan 8.

本文引用的文献

1
Payers Try New Approaches To Manage Molecular Diagnostics: Some payers require prior authorization for molecular diagnostic testing and some don't. And some payers are looking at other options.支付方尝试新方法管理分子诊断:一些支付方要求对分子诊断检测进行预先授权,一些则不要求。还有一些支付方正在考虑其他选择。
Biotechnol Healthc. 2010 Fall;7(3):26-30.
2
Tradeoffs of using administrative claims and medical records to identify the use of personalized medicine for patients with breast cancer.利用行政索赔和医疗记录来确定乳腺癌患者使用个性化药物的权衡。
Med Care. 2011 Jun;49(6):e1-8. doi: 10.1097/MLR.0b013e318207e87e.
3
The effects of oncotype DX recurrence scores on chemotherapy utilization in a multi-institutional breast cancer cohort.Oncotype DX 复发评分对多机构乳腺癌队列中化疗应用的影响。
Breast Cancer Res Treat. 2011 Apr;126(3):797-802. doi: 10.1007/s10549-010-1329-6. Epub 2011 Jan 1.
4
Oncotype DX tumor gene expression profiling in stage II colon cancer. Application: prognostic, risk prediction.Oncotype DX肿瘤基因表达谱在II期结肠癌中的应用:预后评估、风险预测
PLoS Curr. 2010 Sep 2;2:RRN1177. doi: 10.1371/currents.RRN1177.
5
Breast cancer risk by breast density, menopause, and postmenopausal hormone therapy use.按乳腺密度、绝经和绝经后激素治疗使用情况划分的乳腺癌风险。
J Clin Oncol. 2010 Aug 20;28(24):3830-7. doi: 10.1200/JCO.2009.26.4770. Epub 2010 Jul 19.
6
Cancer statistics, 2010.癌症统计数据,2010 年。
CA Cancer J Clin. 2010 Sep-Oct;60(5):277-300. doi: 10.3322/caac.20073. Epub 2010 Jul 7.
7
Economic implications of 21-gene recurrence score assay: US multicenter experience.21基因复发评分检测的经济影响:美国多中心经验
J Clin Oncol. 2010 Aug 1;28(22):e382; author reply e383. doi: 10.1200/JCO.2010.28.8944. Epub 2010 May 24.
8
Cost-effectiveness analysis of recurrence score-guided treatment using a 21-gene assay in early breast cancer.早期乳腺癌中 21 基因检测复发评分指导治疗的成本效果分析。
Oncologist. 2010;15(5):457-65. doi: 10.1634/theoncologist.2009-0275. Epub 2010 Apr 26.
9
Economic implications of 21-gene breast cancer risk assay from the perspective of an Israeli-managed health-care organization.从以色列管理的医疗机构的角度来看 21 基因乳腺癌风险检测的经济影响。
Value Health. 2010 Jun-Jul;13(4):381-7. doi: 10.1111/j.1524-4733.2010.00724.x. Epub 2010 Apr 15.
10
Physician cost profiling--reliability and risk of misclassification.医生成本分析——可靠性和分类错误风险。
N Engl J Med. 2010 Mar 18;362(11):1014-21. doi: 10.1056/NEJMsa0906323.

乳腺癌基因表达谱检测与化疗的应用、严重不良反应以及医疗费用。

Gene expression profile testing for breast cancer and the use of chemotherapy, serious adverse effects, and costs of care.

机构信息

Division of General Medicine and Primary Care, Brigham and Women's Hospital, 1620 Tremont Street, Boston, MA 02120, USA.

出版信息

Breast Cancer Res Treat. 2011 Nov;130(2):619-26. doi: 10.1007/s10549-011-1628-6. Epub 2011 Jun 17.

DOI:10.1007/s10549-011-1628-6
PMID:21681446
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC3590013/
Abstract

As gene expression profile (GEP) testing for breast cancer may provide additional prognostic information to guide the use of adjuvant chemotherapy, we examined the association between GEP testing and use of chemotherapy, serious chemotherapy-related adverse effects, and total charges during the 12 months following diagnosis. Medical record review was conducted for women age 30-64 years, with incident, non-metastatic, invasive breast cancer diagnosed 2006-2008 in a large, national health plan. Of 534 patients, 25.8% received GEP testing, 68.2% received chemotherapy, and 10.5% experienced a serious chemotherapy-related adverse effect. GEP testing was most commonly used in women at moderate clinical risk of recurrence (52.0 vs. 25.0% of low-risk women and 5.5% of high-risk). Controlling for the propensity to receive GEP testing, women who had GEP were less likely to receive chemotherapy (propensity adjusted odds ratio, 95% confidence interval 0.62, 0.39-0.99). Use of GEP was associated with more chemotherapy use among women at low risk based on clinical characteristics (OR = 42.19; CI 2.50-711.82), but less use among women with a high risk based on clinical characteristics (OR = 0.12; CI 0.03-0.47). Use of GEP was not associated with chemotherapy for the moderate risk group. There was no significant relationship between GEP use and either serious chemotherapy-associated adverse effects or total charges. While GEP testing was associated with an overall decrease in adjuvant chemotherapy, we did not find differences in serious chemotherapy-associated adverse events or charges during the 12 months following diagnosis.

摘要

由于基因表达谱(GEP)测试可为乳腺癌提供额外的预后信息,以指导辅助化疗的使用,因此我们研究了 GEP 测试与化疗、严重化疗相关不良事件以及诊断后 12 个月内总费用之间的关联。我们对年龄在 30-64 岁、2006-2008 年期间患有大型国家健康计划中诊断为非转移性、浸润性乳腺癌的女性进行了病历回顾。在 534 名患者中,25.8%接受了 GEP 测试,68.2%接受了化疗,10.5%经历了严重的化疗相关不良事件。GEP 测试最常用于中度临床复发风险的女性(52.0%与低风险女性的 25.0%和高风险女性的 5.5%)。在考虑接受 GEP 测试的倾向后,接受 GEP 测试的女性接受化疗的可能性较小(倾向调整后的优势比,95%置信区间 0.62,0.39-0.99)。基于临床特征,在低危女性中,使用 GEP 与更多的化疗使用相关(OR=42.19;CI 2.50-711.82),而在高危女性中,使用 GEP 与较少的化疗使用相关(OR=0.12;CI 0.03-0.47)。在中等风险组中,GEP 的使用与化疗无关。GEP 使用与严重化疗相关不良事件或总费用之间没有明显关系。虽然 GEP 测试与辅助化疗的总体减少相关,但我们没有发现诊断后 12 个月内严重化疗相关不良事件或费用的差异。