• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

相似文献

1
Underutilization of gene expression profiling for early-stage breast cancer in California.加利福尼亚州早期乳腺癌基因表达谱检测的利用不足情况。
Cancer Causes Control. 2016 Jun;27(6):721-7. doi: 10.1007/s10552-016-0743-4. Epub 2016 Apr 20.
2
Racial disparities in omission of oncotype DX but no racial disparities in chemotherapy receipt following completed oncotype DX test results.种族差异导致省略 Oncotype DX 检测,但在完成 Oncotype DX 检测结果后,种族差异并不影响接受化疗。
Breast Cancer Res Treat. 2018 Feb;168(1):207-220. doi: 10.1007/s10549-017-4587-8. Epub 2017 Nov 27.
3
Influence of provider factors and race on uptake of breast cancer gene expression profiling.提供者因素和种族对乳腺癌基因表达谱检测的影响。
Cancer. 2018 Apr 15;124(8):1743-1751. doi: 10.1002/cncr.31222. Epub 2018 Jan 16.
4
Racial Variation in the Uptake of Oncotype DX Testing for Early-Stage Breast Cancer.早期乳腺癌Oncotype DX检测应用中的种族差异。
J Clin Oncol. 2016 Jan 10;34(2):130-8. doi: 10.1200/JCO.2015.63.2489. Epub 2015 Nov 23.
5
Racial and Ethnic Disparities in Oncotype DX Test Receipt in a Statewide Population-Based Study.在一项全州范围内基于人群的研究中,Oncotype DX 测试接受情况的种族和民族差异。
J Natl Compr Canc Netw. 2017 Mar;15(3):346-354. doi: 10.6004/jnccn.2017.0034.
6
A cost-consequence model of using the 21-gene assay to identify patients with early-stage node-positive breast cancer who benefit from adjuvant chemotherapy in the Netherlands.使用 21 基因检测来识别荷兰早期淋巴结阳性乳腺癌患者中从辅助化疗中获益的患者的成本-后果模型。
J Med Econ. 2024 Jan-Dec;27(1):445-454. doi: 10.1080/13696998.2024.2324612. Epub 2024 Mar 12.
7
Disparities in Breast Cancer Survival by Socioeconomic Status Despite Medicare and Medicaid Insurance.尽管有医疗保险和医疗补助保险,但社会经济地位对乳腺癌生存的差异。
Milbank Q. 2018 Dec;96(4):706-754. doi: 10.1111/1468-0009.12355.
8
A tracking and feedback registry to reduce racial disparities in breast cancer care.一个旨在减少乳腺癌护理中种族差异的跟踪与反馈登记系统。
J Natl Cancer Inst. 2008 Dec 3;100(23):1717-23. doi: 10.1093/jnci/djn387. Epub 2008 Nov 25.
9
Variation in breast cancer care quality in New York and California based on race/ethnicity and Medicaid enrollment.纽约和加利福尼亚州乳腺癌护理质量因种族/族裔和医疗补助登记情况而异。
Cancer. 2016 Feb 1;122(3):420-31. doi: 10.1002/cncr.29777. Epub 2015 Nov 4.
10
Uptake of the 21-Gene Assay Among Women With Node-Positive, Hormone Receptor-Positive Breast Cancer.淋巴结阳性、激素受体阳性乳腺癌女性患者对 21 基因检测的应用。
J Natl Compr Canc Netw. 2019 Jun 1;17(6):662-668. doi: 10.6004/jnccn.2018.7266.

引用本文的文献

1
Socioeconomic Disparities in Breast Cancer Survival: Examining Potential Mediator Role of Oncotype DX(ODX) Test and Stage at Diagnosis Among HR+/HER2- Breast Cancer Women.乳腺癌生存中的社会经济差异:探究HR+/HER2-型乳腺癌女性中Oncotype DX(ODX)检测及诊断分期的潜在中介作用
Cancers (Basel). 2025 May 28;17(11):1802. doi: 10.3390/cancers17111802.
2
Socioecologic Factors and Racial Differences in Breast Cancer Multigene Prognostic Scores in US Women.社会生态因素与美国女性乳腺癌多基因预后评分的种族差异。
JAMA Netw Open. 2024 Apr 1;7(4):e244862. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2024.4862.
3
Disparities in OncotypeDx Testing and Subsequent Chemotherapy Receipt by Geography and Socioeconomic Status.地理和社会经济地位差异与 OncotypeDx 检测及后续化疗的接受情况。
Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev. 2024 May 1;33(5):654-661. doi: 10.1158/1055-9965.EPI-23-1201.
4
Differential distribution of actual and surrogate oncotype DX recurrence scores in breast cancer patients by age, menopausal status, race, and body mass index.乳腺癌患者按年龄、绝经状态、种族和体重指数的实际和替代 oncotype DX 复发评分的差异分布。
Breast Cancer Res Treat. 2023 Oct;201(3):447-460. doi: 10.1007/s10549-023-07025-8. Epub 2023 Jul 15.
5
Survival Disparities in US Black Compared to White Women with Hormone Receptor Positive-HER2 Negative Breast Cancer.美国激素受体阳性、HER2 阴性乳腺癌的黑种女性与白种女性的生存差异。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2023 Feb 7;20(4):2903. doi: 10.3390/ijerph20042903.
6
Use of a supervised machine learning model to predict Oncotype DX risk category in node-positive patients older than 50 years of age.应用监督机器学习模型预测 50 岁以上淋巴结阳性患者的 Oncotype DX 风险分级。
Breast Cancer Res Treat. 2022 Dec;196(3):565-570. doi: 10.1007/s10549-022-06763-5. Epub 2022 Oct 21.
7
Hospital Rurality and Gene Expression Profiling for Early-Stage Breast Cancer among Iowa Residents (2010-2018).爱荷华州农村地区医院与早期乳腺癌基因表达谱分析(2010-2018 年)
Breast J. 2022 Aug 30;2022:8582894. doi: 10.1155/2022/8582894. eCollection 2022.
8
Sociodemographic and clinical factors associated with receipt of biomarker testing in patients with metastatic colorectal cancer.与转移性结直肠癌患者接受生物标志物检测相关的社会人口学和临床因素。
Cancer Med. 2023 Jan;12(2):1850-1859. doi: 10.1002/cam4.4995. Epub 2022 Jul 15.
9
Analyzing Precision Medicine Utilization with Real-World Data: A Scoping Review.利用真实世界数据分析精准医学的应用:一项范围综述
J Pers Med. 2022 Apr 1;12(4):557. doi: 10.3390/jpm12040557.
10
Oncotype DX Test Receipt among Latina/Hispanic Women with Early Invasive Breast Cancer in New Jersey: A Registry-Based Study.新泽西州早期浸润性乳腺癌拉丁裔/西班牙裔女性的 Oncotype DX 测试收据:一项基于登记的研究。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2021 May 12;18(10):5116. doi: 10.3390/ijerph18105116.

本文引用的文献

1
Invasive Breast Cancer Version 1.2016, NCCN Clinical Practice Guidelines in Oncology.浸润性乳腺癌,2016年第1版,美国国立综合癌症网络(NCCN)肿瘤学临床实践指南
J Natl Compr Canc Netw. 2016 Mar;14(3):324-54. doi: 10.6004/jnccn.2016.0037.
2
Racial Variation in the Uptake of Oncotype DX Testing for Early-Stage Breast Cancer.早期乳腺癌Oncotype DX检测应用中的种族差异。
J Clin Oncol. 2016 Jan 10;34(2):130-8. doi: 10.1200/JCO.2015.63.2489. Epub 2015 Nov 23.
3
Prospective Validation of a 21-Gene Expression Assay in Breast Cancer.21基因表达检测法在乳腺癌中的前瞻性验证
N Engl J Med. 2015 Nov 19;373(21):2005-14. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa1510764. Epub 2015 Sep 27.
4
Association Between Use of the 21-Gene Recurrence Score Assay and Receipt of Chemotherapy Among Medicare Beneficiaries With Early-Stage Breast Cancer, 2005-2009.21- 基因复发评分检测的使用与 2005-2009 年 Medicare 受益人群早期乳腺癌患者化疗的相关性。
JAMA Oncol. 2015 Nov;1(8):1098-109. doi: 10.1001/jamaoncol.2015.2722.
5
Population-based study of the effect of gene expression profiling on adjuvant chemotherapy use in breast cancer patients under the age of 65 years.基于人群的基因表达谱分析对65岁以下乳腺癌患者辅助化疗使用情况影响的研究。
Cancer. 2015 Nov 15;121(22):4062-70. doi: 10.1002/cncr.29621. Epub 2015 Aug 20.
6
Oncotype Dx assay and breast cancer in the United States: usage and concordance with chemotherapy.美国的Oncotype Dx检测与乳腺癌:使用情况及与化疗的一致性
Breast Cancer Res Treat. 2015 May;151(1):149-56. doi: 10.1007/s10549-015-3366-7. Epub 2015 Apr 10.
7
Cancer statistics, 2015.癌症统计数据,2015 年。
CA Cancer J Clin. 2015 Jan-Feb;65(1):5-29. doi: 10.3322/caac.21254. Epub 2015 Jan 5.
8
Receipt of chemotherapy among medicare patients with cancer by type of supplemental insurance.按补充保险类型划分的医疗保险癌症患者接受化疗的情况
J Clin Oncol. 2015 Feb 1;33(4):312-8. doi: 10.1200/JCO.2014.55.3107. Epub 2014 Dec 22.
9
Comparison of SEER Treatment Data With Medicare Claims.监测、流行病学与最终结果(SEER)治疗数据与医疗保险理赔数据的比较
Med Care. 2016 Sep;54(9):e55-64. doi: 10.1097/MLR.0000000000000073.
10
Impact of oncotype DX recurrence score in the management of breast cancer cases.Oncotype DX 复发评分对乳腺癌病例管理的影响。
Clin Breast Cancer. 2014 Jun;14(3):182-90. doi: 10.1016/j.clbc.2013.12.002. Epub 2013 Dec 27.

加利福尼亚州早期乳腺癌基因表达谱检测的利用不足情况。

Underutilization of gene expression profiling for early-stage breast cancer in California.

作者信息

Cress Rosemary D, Chen Yingjia S, Morris Cyllene R, Chew Helen, Kizer Kenneth W

机构信息

Department of Public Health Sciences, School of Medicine, University of California, Davis, Davis, CA, USA.

Cancer Registry of Greater California, Public Health Institute, 1825 Bell Street, Suite 102, Sacramento, CA, 95825, USA.

出版信息

Cancer Causes Control. 2016 Jun;27(6):721-7. doi: 10.1007/s10552-016-0743-4. Epub 2016 Apr 20.

DOI:10.1007/s10552-016-0743-4
PMID:27097910
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC4871729/
Abstract

PURPOSE

To describe the utilization of gene expression profiling (GEP) among California breast cancer patients, identify predictors of use of GEP, and evaluate how utilization of GEP influenced treatment of early-stage breast cancer.

METHODS

All women diagnosed with hormone-receptor-positive, node-negative breast cancer reported to the California Cancer Registry between January 2008 and December 2010 were linked to Oncotype DX (ODX) assay results.

RESULTS

Overall, 26.7 % of 23,789 eligible patients underwent the assay during the study period. Women age 65 or older were much less likely than women under age 50 to be tested (15.1 vs. 41.4 %, p < 0.001). Black women were slightly less likely and Asian women were slightly more likely than non-Hispanic white women to undergo GEP with the ODX assay (22.2 and 28.9 vs. 26.9 %, respectively, p < 0.001). Patients residing in low SES census tracts had the lowest use of the test (8.9 %), with the proportion increasing with higher SES category. Women with Medicaid health insurance were less likely than other women to be tested (17.7 vs. 27.5 %, p < 0.001). Receipt of adjuvant chemotherapy (ACT) was associated with the ODX recurrence score, although only 63 % of patients whose recurrence scores indicated a high benefit received ACT. Of patients not tested, 15 % received ACT.

CONCLUSIONS

Nearly three-fourths of eligible breast cancer patients in California during the 3-year period 2008 through 2010 did not undergo GEP. As a result, it is likely that many women unnecessarily received ACT and suffered associated morbidity. In addition, some high-risk women who would have benefited most from ACT were not identified.

摘要

目的

描述加利福尼亚州乳腺癌患者中基因表达谱分析(GEP)的应用情况,确定GEP使用的预测因素,并评估GEP的应用如何影响早期乳腺癌的治疗。

方法

2008年1月至2010年12月期间向加利福尼亚癌症登记处报告的所有诊断为激素受体阳性、淋巴结阴性乳腺癌的女性均与Oncotype DX(ODX)检测结果相关联。

结果

总体而言,在研究期间,23789名符合条件的患者中有26.7%接受了该检测。65岁及以上的女性接受检测的可能性远低于50岁以下的女性(15.1%对41.4%,p<0.001)。黑人女性接受ODX检测进行GEP的可能性略低于非西班牙裔白人女性,而亚洲女性略高于非西班牙裔白人女性(分别为22.2%、28.9%对26.9%,p<0.001)。居住在社会经济地位较低普查区的患者检测使用率最低(8.9%),且随着社会经济地位类别升高,比例增加。有医疗补助健康保险的女性接受检测的可能性低于其他女性(17.7%对27.5%,p<0.001)。辅助化疗(ACT)的接受与ODX复发评分相关,尽管复发评分显示有高获益的患者中只有63%接受了ACT。未接受检测的患者中有15%接受了ACT。

结论

在2008年至2010年这3年期间,加利福尼亚州近四分之三符合条件的乳腺癌患者未进行GEP。因此,很可能许多女性不必要地接受了ACT并遭受了相关的发病率。此外,一些本可从ACT中获益最大的高危女性未被识别出来。