Suppr超能文献

加利福尼亚州早期乳腺癌基因表达谱检测的利用不足情况。

Underutilization of gene expression profiling for early-stage breast cancer in California.

作者信息

Cress Rosemary D, Chen Yingjia S, Morris Cyllene R, Chew Helen, Kizer Kenneth W

机构信息

Department of Public Health Sciences, School of Medicine, University of California, Davis, Davis, CA, USA.

Cancer Registry of Greater California, Public Health Institute, 1825 Bell Street, Suite 102, Sacramento, CA, 95825, USA.

出版信息

Cancer Causes Control. 2016 Jun;27(6):721-7. doi: 10.1007/s10552-016-0743-4. Epub 2016 Apr 20.

Abstract

PURPOSE

To describe the utilization of gene expression profiling (GEP) among California breast cancer patients, identify predictors of use of GEP, and evaluate how utilization of GEP influenced treatment of early-stage breast cancer.

METHODS

All women diagnosed with hormone-receptor-positive, node-negative breast cancer reported to the California Cancer Registry between January 2008 and December 2010 were linked to Oncotype DX (ODX) assay results.

RESULTS

Overall, 26.7 % of 23,789 eligible patients underwent the assay during the study period. Women age 65 or older were much less likely than women under age 50 to be tested (15.1 vs. 41.4 %, p < 0.001). Black women were slightly less likely and Asian women were slightly more likely than non-Hispanic white women to undergo GEP with the ODX assay (22.2 and 28.9 vs. 26.9 %, respectively, p < 0.001). Patients residing in low SES census tracts had the lowest use of the test (8.9 %), with the proportion increasing with higher SES category. Women with Medicaid health insurance were less likely than other women to be tested (17.7 vs. 27.5 %, p < 0.001). Receipt of adjuvant chemotherapy (ACT) was associated with the ODX recurrence score, although only 63 % of patients whose recurrence scores indicated a high benefit received ACT. Of patients not tested, 15 % received ACT.

CONCLUSIONS

Nearly three-fourths of eligible breast cancer patients in California during the 3-year period 2008 through 2010 did not undergo GEP. As a result, it is likely that many women unnecessarily received ACT and suffered associated morbidity. In addition, some high-risk women who would have benefited most from ACT were not identified.

摘要

目的

描述加利福尼亚州乳腺癌患者中基因表达谱分析(GEP)的应用情况,确定GEP使用的预测因素,并评估GEP的应用如何影响早期乳腺癌的治疗。

方法

2008年1月至2010年12月期间向加利福尼亚癌症登记处报告的所有诊断为激素受体阳性、淋巴结阴性乳腺癌的女性均与Oncotype DX(ODX)检测结果相关联。

结果

总体而言,在研究期间,23789名符合条件的患者中有26.7%接受了该检测。65岁及以上的女性接受检测的可能性远低于50岁以下的女性(15.1%对41.4%,p<0.001)。黑人女性接受ODX检测进行GEP的可能性略低于非西班牙裔白人女性,而亚洲女性略高于非西班牙裔白人女性(分别为22.2%、28.9%对26.9%,p<0.001)。居住在社会经济地位较低普查区的患者检测使用率最低(8.9%),且随着社会经济地位类别升高,比例增加。有医疗补助健康保险的女性接受检测的可能性低于其他女性(17.7%对27.5%,p<0.001)。辅助化疗(ACT)的接受与ODX复发评分相关,尽管复发评分显示有高获益的患者中只有63%接受了ACT。未接受检测的患者中有15%接受了ACT。

结论

在2008年至2010年这3年期间,加利福尼亚州近四分之三符合条件的乳腺癌患者未进行GEP。因此,很可能许多女性不必要地接受了ACT并遭受了相关的发病率。此外,一些本可从ACT中获益最大的高危女性未被识别出来。

相似文献

1
Underutilization of gene expression profiling for early-stage breast cancer in California.
Cancer Causes Control. 2016 Jun;27(6):721-7. doi: 10.1007/s10552-016-0743-4. Epub 2016 Apr 20.
2
Racial disparities in omission of oncotype DX but no racial disparities in chemotherapy receipt following completed oncotype DX test results.
Breast Cancer Res Treat. 2018 Feb;168(1):207-220. doi: 10.1007/s10549-017-4587-8. Epub 2017 Nov 27.
3
Influence of provider factors and race on uptake of breast cancer gene expression profiling.
Cancer. 2018 Apr 15;124(8):1743-1751. doi: 10.1002/cncr.31222. Epub 2018 Jan 16.
4
Racial Variation in the Uptake of Oncotype DX Testing for Early-Stage Breast Cancer.
J Clin Oncol. 2016 Jan 10;34(2):130-8. doi: 10.1200/JCO.2015.63.2489. Epub 2015 Nov 23.
5
Racial and Ethnic Disparities in Oncotype DX Test Receipt in a Statewide Population-Based Study.
J Natl Compr Canc Netw. 2017 Mar;15(3):346-354. doi: 10.6004/jnccn.2017.0034.
8
A tracking and feedback registry to reduce racial disparities in breast cancer care.
J Natl Cancer Inst. 2008 Dec 3;100(23):1717-23. doi: 10.1093/jnci/djn387. Epub 2008 Nov 25.
10
Uptake of the 21-Gene Assay Among Women With Node-Positive, Hormone Receptor-Positive Breast Cancer.
J Natl Compr Canc Netw. 2019 Jun 1;17(6):662-668. doi: 10.6004/jnccn.2018.7266.

引用本文的文献

2
Socioecologic Factors and Racial Differences in Breast Cancer Multigene Prognostic Scores in US Women.
JAMA Netw Open. 2024 Apr 1;7(4):e244862. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2024.4862.
3
Disparities in OncotypeDx Testing and Subsequent Chemotherapy Receipt by Geography and Socioeconomic Status.
Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev. 2024 May 1;33(5):654-661. doi: 10.1158/1055-9965.EPI-23-1201.
5
Survival Disparities in US Black Compared to White Women with Hormone Receptor Positive-HER2 Negative Breast Cancer.
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2023 Feb 7;20(4):2903. doi: 10.3390/ijerph20042903.
6
Use of a supervised machine learning model to predict Oncotype DX risk category in node-positive patients older than 50 years of age.
Breast Cancer Res Treat. 2022 Dec;196(3):565-570. doi: 10.1007/s10549-022-06763-5. Epub 2022 Oct 21.
7
Hospital Rurality and Gene Expression Profiling for Early-Stage Breast Cancer among Iowa Residents (2010-2018).
Breast J. 2022 Aug 30;2022:8582894. doi: 10.1155/2022/8582894. eCollection 2022.
9
Analyzing Precision Medicine Utilization with Real-World Data: A Scoping Review.
J Pers Med. 2022 Apr 1;12(4):557. doi: 10.3390/jpm12040557.
10
Oncotype DX Test Receipt among Latina/Hispanic Women with Early Invasive Breast Cancer in New Jersey: A Registry-Based Study.
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2021 May 12;18(10):5116. doi: 10.3390/ijerph18105116.

本文引用的文献

1
Invasive Breast Cancer Version 1.2016, NCCN Clinical Practice Guidelines in Oncology.
J Natl Compr Canc Netw. 2016 Mar;14(3):324-54. doi: 10.6004/jnccn.2016.0037.
2
Racial Variation in the Uptake of Oncotype DX Testing for Early-Stage Breast Cancer.
J Clin Oncol. 2016 Jan 10;34(2):130-8. doi: 10.1200/JCO.2015.63.2489. Epub 2015 Nov 23.
3
Prospective Validation of a 21-Gene Expression Assay in Breast Cancer.
N Engl J Med. 2015 Nov 19;373(21):2005-14. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa1510764. Epub 2015 Sep 27.
6
Oncotype Dx assay and breast cancer in the United States: usage and concordance with chemotherapy.
Breast Cancer Res Treat. 2015 May;151(1):149-56. doi: 10.1007/s10549-015-3366-7. Epub 2015 Apr 10.
7
Cancer statistics, 2015.
CA Cancer J Clin. 2015 Jan-Feb;65(1):5-29. doi: 10.3322/caac.21254. Epub 2015 Jan 5.
8
Receipt of chemotherapy among medicare patients with cancer by type of supplemental insurance.
J Clin Oncol. 2015 Feb 1;33(4):312-8. doi: 10.1200/JCO.2014.55.3107. Epub 2014 Dec 22.
9
Comparison of SEER Treatment Data With Medicare Claims.
Med Care. 2016 Sep;54(9):e55-64. doi: 10.1097/MLR.0000000000000073.
10
Impact of oncotype DX recurrence score in the management of breast cancer cases.
Clin Breast Cancer. 2014 Jun;14(3):182-90. doi: 10.1016/j.clbc.2013.12.002. Epub 2013 Dec 27.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验