Baruffi G, Strobino D M, Paine L L
Johns Hopkins University School of Hygiene and Public Health, Maternal and Child Health Department, Baltimore, MD 21205.
J Nurse Midwifery. 1990 Sep-Oct;35(5):274-81. doi: 10.1016/0091-2182(90)90080-o.
Differences in primary cesarean birth rates between a maternity center staffed by certified nurse-midwives (CNM) with physician backup on the premises and a university teaching hospital staffed by resident and attending physicians were studied. The study sample included 796 and 804 women, similar in demographics, who received their prenatal and intrapartum care in the respective sites in 1977 and 1978. Study results indicate a significantly lower rate of primary cesarean birth at the maternity center than at the university hospital that was independent of institutional differences in the indications for abdominal delivery. Although cesarean birth was related to contracted pelvis (at labor), fetal malpresentation, and placental bleeding at both institutions, it was significantly associated with preeclampsia, primiparity, fetal distress, and maternal age only at the university hospital. There were no noteworthy differences in pregnancy outcomes for women delivered vaginally or by cesarean, except for more newborns with low Apgar scores among primary cesarean births at the university hospital. A likely explanation for these findings is differing labor and delivery management styles between the providers of care at the two institutions.
对一家配备有执业助产士(CNM)且有医师后备支持的产科中心与一家由住院医师和主治医生配备的大学教学医院之间的初次剖宫产率差异进行了研究。研究样本包括796名和804名女性,她们在人口统计学上相似,于1977年和1978年在各自的机构接受产前和产时护理。研究结果表明,产科中心的初次剖宫产率显著低于大学医院,且这与腹部分娩指征的机构差异无关。虽然剖宫产在两家机构都与骨盆狭窄(分娩时)、胎位异常和胎盘出血有关,但仅在大学医院,剖宫产与先兆子痫、初产、胎儿窘迫和产妇年龄显著相关。阴道分娩或剖宫产的女性在妊娠结局方面没有值得注意的差异,除了大学医院初次剖宫产出生的新生儿中Apgar评分较低的更多。对这些发现的一个可能解释是两家机构护理提供者之间不同的分娩管理方式。