• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

相似文献

1
Understanding the Allocation of Caesarean Outcome to Provider Type: A Chart Review.了解剖宫产结局在不同医疗服务提供者类型中的分布情况:一项图表回顾分析。
Healthc Policy. 2018 Nov;14(2):22-30. doi: 10.12927/hcpol.2018.25689.
2
Vaginal delivery of breech presentation.臀位的阴道分娩
J Obstet Gynaecol Can. 2009 Jun;31(6):557-566. doi: 10.1016/S1701-2163(16)34221-9.
3
Prevalence and determinants of caesarean section in Jamaica.牙买加剖宫产的患病率及影响因素
J Biosoc Sci. 1992 Oct;24(4):515-25. doi: 10.1017/s0021932000020071.
4
Association between provider type and cesarean birth in healthy nulliparous laboring women: A retrospective cohort study.健康初产妇分娩时医疗服务提供者类型与剖宫产之间的关联:一项回顾性队列研究。
Birth. 2018 Jun;45(2):159-168. doi: 10.1111/birt.12334. Epub 2018 Jan 31.
5
Unwarranted Variation in Utilization of Cesarean Birth Among Low-Risk Childbearing Women.低风险育龄妇女剖宫产使用率的不合理差异。
J Midwifery Womens Health. 2017 Jan;62(1):49-57. doi: 10.1111/jmwh.12565.
6
Cesarean delivery among nulliparous women in Beirut: assessing predictors in nine hospitals.贝鲁特未生育女性的剖宫产情况:评估九家医院的预测因素。
Birth. 2007 Mar;34(1):14-20. doi: 10.1111/j.1523-536X.2006.00141.x.
7
Do provider birth attitudes influence cesarean delivery rate: a cross-sectional study.医生的分娩态度是否会影响剖宫产率:一项横断面研究。
BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2018 May 29;18(1):184. doi: 10.1186/s12884-018-1756-7.
8
The relationship between cesarean section and labor induction.剖宫产与引产的关系。
J Nurs Scholarsh. 2010 Jun;42(2):130-8. doi: 10.1111/j.1547-5069.2010.01346.x.
9
Clinical interventions that increase the uptake and success of vaginal birth after caesarean section: a systematic review.临床干预措施增加剖宫产术后阴道分娩的成功率:系统评价。
J Adv Nurs. 2011 Aug;67(8):1646-61. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2648.2011.05635.x. Epub 2011 Apr 8.
10
No. 281-Classification of Caesarean Sections in Canada: The Modified Robson Criteria.
J Obstet Gynaecol Can. 2017 Dec;39(12):e551-e553. doi: 10.1016/j.jogc.2017.10.017.

引用本文的文献

1
Author response to "Pitfalls of analyzing perinatal outcomes by health care provider".作者对“医疗服务提供者分析围产期结局的陷阱”的回应。
CMAJ. 2023 Apr 24;195(16):E590. doi: 10.1503/cmaj.148391-l.
2
Pitfalls of analyzing perinatal outcomes by health care provider.按医疗服务提供者分析围产期结局的陷阱。
CMAJ. 2023 Apr 24;195(16):E589. doi: 10.1503/cmaj.148294-l.
3
Perinatal outcomes of midwife-led care, stratified by medical risk: a retrospective cohort study from British Columbia (2008-2018).围产期结局的助产士主导的护理,分层的医疗风险:不列颠哥伦比亚省的回顾性队列研究(2008-2018 年)。
CMAJ. 2023 Feb 27;195(8):E292-E299. doi: 10.1503/cmaj.220453.

本文引用的文献

1
Maternity Outcomes in Manitoba Women: A Comparison between Midwifery-led Care and Physician-led Care at Birth.曼尼托巴省女性的孕产结局:助产士主导护理与医生主导分娩护理的比较。
Birth. 2016 Jun;43(2):108-15. doi: 10.1111/birt.12225. Epub 2016 Feb 18.
2
Quality of prenatal care questionnaire: psychometric testing in an Australia population.产前护理质量问卷:澳大利亚人群中的心理测量测试
BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2015 Sep 10;15:214. doi: 10.1186/s12884-015-0644-7.
3
Outcomes of deliveries by family physicians or obstetricians: a population-based cohort study using an instrumental variable.家庭医生或产科医生接生的结局:一项使用工具变量的基于人群的队列研究。
CMAJ. 2015 Oct 20;187(15):1125-1132. doi: 10.1503/cmaj.141633. Epub 2015 Aug 24.
4
Barriers, motivators and facilitators related to prenatal care utilization among inner-city women in Winnipeg, Canada: a case-control study.加拿大温尼伯市中心城区女性产前护理利用的相关障碍、动机和促进因素:一项病例对照研究
BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2014 Jul 15;14:227. doi: 10.1186/1471-2393-14-227.
5
Interrater reliability: the kappa statistic.组内一致性:kappa 统计量。
Biochem Med (Zagreb). 2012;22(3):276-82.
6
Women's and care providers' perspectives of quality prenatal care: a qualitative descriptive study.妇女和护理提供者对产前护理质量的看法:一项定性描述性研究。
BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2012 Apr 13;12:29. doi: 10.1186/1471-2393-12-29.
7
Perinatal and maternal outcomes by planned place of birth for healthy women with low risk pregnancies: the Birthplace in England national prospective cohort study.健康低风险孕妇的分娩地点与围产儿和产妇结局:英国Birthplace 前瞻性队列研究。
BMJ. 2011 Nov 23;343:d7400. doi: 10.1136/bmj.d7400.
8
Outcomes associated with planned home and planned hospital births in low-risk women attended by midwives in Ontario, Canada, 2003-2006: a retrospective cohort study.2003 - 2006年加拿大安大略省由助产士护理的低风险女性计划在家分娩和计划在医院分娩的相关结局:一项回顾性队列研究
Birth. 2009 Sep;36(3):180-9. doi: 10.1111/j.1523-536X.2009.00322.x.
9
Outcomes of planned home birth with registered midwife versus planned hospital birth with midwife or physician.由注册助产士接生的计划在家分娩与由助产士或医生接生的计划在医院分娩的结局比较。
CMAJ. 2009 Sep 15;181(6-7):377-83. doi: 10.1503/cmaj.081869. Epub 2009 Aug 31.
10
Outcomes of planned hospital birth attended by midwives compared with physicians in British Columbia.不列颠哥伦比亚省由助产士接生与由医生接生的计划内医院分娩结局比较。
Birth. 2007 Jun;34(2):140-7. doi: 10.1111/j.1523-536X.2007.00160.x.

了解剖宫产结局在不同医疗服务提供者类型中的分布情况:一项图表回顾分析。

Understanding the Allocation of Caesarean Outcome to Provider Type: A Chart Review.

作者信息

Thiessen Kellie, Nickel Nathan, Prior Heather J, Morris Margaret, Robinson Kristine

机构信息

Director, Midwifery Program (University of Manitoba/McMaster University), Assistant Professor, College of Nursing, Rady Faculty of Health Sciences, University of Manitoba, Winnipeg, MB.

Assistant Professor, Manitoba Centre for Health Policy, Max Rady College of Medicine, Rady Faculty of Health Sciences, University of Manitoba, Winnipeg, MB.

出版信息

Healthc Policy. 2018 Nov;14(2):22-30. doi: 10.12927/hcpol.2018.25689.

DOI:10.12927/hcpol.2018.25689
PMID:30710438
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC7008672/
Abstract

INTRODUCTION

The concept, "most responsible provider" has a specific definition in the Canadian National Discharge Abstract Database (DAD). Variation exists in how care providers are defined in administrative data.

METHODS

We compared chart data with administrative data to understand how "most responsible provider" was identified in these two data sources.

RESULTS

We found a 3% discrepancy between data sources. Differences between data sources were attributable to transfers in care that occurred at birth.

DISCUSSION

"Most responsible provider" should consider the full trajectory of care when assigning outcomes in order to understand how to best support optimal health among low-risk births.

摘要

引言

“最主要责任提供者”这一概念在加拿大国家出院摘要数据库(DAD)中有特定定义。行政数据中护理提供者的定义存在差异。

方法

我们将病历数据与行政数据进行比较,以了解在这两个数据源中如何确定“最主要责任提供者”。

结果

我们发现数据源之间存在3%的差异。数据源之间的差异可归因于出生时发生的护理转移。

讨论

“最主要责任提供者”在分配结果时应考虑护理的全过程,以便了解如何最好地支持低风险分娩中的最佳健康状况。