Suppr超能文献

生物制剂治疗可改善类风湿关节炎合并淀粉样变性患者的预后。

Treatment with biologic agents improves the prognosis of patients with rheumatoid arthritis and amyloidosis.

机构信息

Niigata University Health Administration Center; Department of Health and Nutrition, Faculty of Human Life Studies, University of Niigata Prefecture, Japan.

出版信息

J Rheumatol. 2012 Jul;39(7):1348-54. doi: 10.3899/jrheum.111453. Epub 2012 May 15.

Abstract

OBJECTIVE

Reactive amyloid A (AA) amyloidosis is a serious and life-threatening systemic complication of rheumatoid arthritis (RA). We evaluated the safety of therapy with anti-tumor necrosis factor and anti-interleukin 6 biologic agents in RA patients with reactive AA amyloidosis, together with prognosis and hemodialysis (HD)-free survival, in comparison with patients with AA amyloidosis without such therapy.

METHODS

One hundred thirty-three patients with an established diagnosis of reactive AA amyloidosis participated in the study. Clinical data were assessed from patient records at the time of amyloid detection and administration of biologics. Survival was calculated from the date when amyloid was first demonstrated histologically or the date when biologic therapy was started until the time of death or to the end of 2010 for surviving patients. Patients who had started HD were selected for inclusion only after the presence of amyloid was demonstrated.

RESULTS

Fifty-three patients were treated with biologic agents (biologic group) and 80 were not (nonbiologic group). Survival rate was significantly higher in the biologic group than in the nonbiologic group. Nine patients in the biologics group and 33 in the nonbiologic group started HD. Biologic therapy had a tendency for reduced risk of initiation of HD without any statistical significance.

CONCLUSION

Patients with amyloidosis have a higher mortality rate, but the use of biologic agents can reduce risk of death. The use of biologics may not significantly influence the HD-free survival rate.

摘要

目的

反应性淀粉样蛋白 A (AA) 淀粉样变性是类风湿关节炎 (RA) 的一种严重且危及生命的全身性并发症。我们评估了抗肿瘤坏死因子和抗白细胞介素 6 生物制剂治疗伴有反应性 AA 淀粉样变性的 RA 患者的安全性,以及与未接受此类治疗的 AA 淀粉样变性患者的预后和无血液透析 (HD) 生存情况。

方法

133 例确诊为反应性 AA 淀粉样变性的患者参与了这项研究。临床数据是根据淀粉样蛋白检测和生物制剂治疗时的患者记录评估的。生存时间从首次组织学证实淀粉样变性或开始生物治疗的日期计算,直至死亡或截止到 2010 年仍存活的患者。仅在证实存在淀粉样变性后,才选择开始接受 HD 治疗的患者。

结果

53 例患者接受了生物制剂治疗(生物制剂组),80 例患者未接受(非生物制剂组)。生物制剂组的生存率明显高于非生物制剂组。生物制剂组有 9 例患者和非生物制剂组有 33 例患者开始接受 HD 治疗。生物治疗有降低 HD 起始风险的趋势,但无统计学意义。

结论

淀粉样变性患者的死亡率较高,但生物制剂的使用可以降低死亡风险。生物制剂的使用可能不会显著影响无 HD 生存时间。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验