Suppr超能文献

因果系统类别:新手和专家对因果现象分类的差异。

Causal systems categories: differences in novice and expert categorization of causal phenomena.

机构信息

Department of Hospital Medicine, University of Chicago, USA.

出版信息

Cogn Sci. 2012 Jul;36(5):919-32. doi: 10.1111/j.1551-6709.2012.01253.x. Epub 2012 May 16.

Abstract

We investigated the understanding of causal systems categories--categories defined by common causal structure rather than by common domain content--among college students. We asked students who were either novices or experts in the physical sciences to sort descriptions of real-world phenomena that varied in their causal structure (e.g., negative feedback vs. causal chain) and in their content domain (e.g., economics vs. biology). Our hypothesis was that there would be a shift from domain-based sorting to causal sorting with increasing expertise in the relevant domains. This prediction was borne out: the novice groups sorted primarily by domain and the expert group sorted by causal category. These results suggest that science training facilitates insight about causal structures.

摘要

我们调查了大学生对因果系统类别(由共同因果结构定义的类别,而不是由共同领域内容定义的类别)的理解。我们要求物理科学领域的新手和专家学生对描述具有不同因果结构(例如负反馈与因果链)和不同内容领域(例如经济学与生物学)的真实世界现象进行分类。我们的假设是,随着相关领域专业知识的增加,分类方式将从基于领域的分类转变为基于因果关系的分类。这一预测得到了验证:新手组主要根据领域进行分类,而专家组则根据因果类别进行分类。这些结果表明,科学训练有助于深入了解因果结构。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验