Li Lu, Dou Lixia, Leung Ping Chung, Wang Chi Chiu
Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, The Chinese University of Hong Kong, Shatin, Hong Kong.
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2012 May 16;2012(5):CD008510. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD008510.pub2.
BACKGROUND: Threatened miscarriage occurs in 10% to 15% of all pregnancies. Vaginal spotting or bleeding during early gestation is common, with nearly half of those pregnancies resulting in pregnancy loss. To date, there is no effective preventive treatment for threatened miscarriage. Chinese herbal medicines have been widely used in Asian countries for centuries and have become a popular alternative to Western medicines in recent years. Many studies claim to show that they can prevent miscarriage. However, there has been no systematic evaluation of the effectiveness of Chinese herbal medicines for threatened miscarriage. OBJECTIVES: To review the therapeutic effects of Chinese herbal medicines for the treatment of threatened miscarriage. SEARCH METHODS: We searched the Cochrane Pregnancy and Childbirth Group's Trials Register (31 January 2012), Chinese Biomedical Database (1978 to 31 January 2012), China Journal Net (1915 to 31 January 2012), China National Knowledge Infrastructure (1915 to 31 January 2012), WanFang Database (1980 to 31 January 2012), Chinese Clinical Trial Registry (31 January 2012), EMBASE (1980 to 31 January 2012), CINAHL (31 January 2012), PubMed (1980 to 31 January 2012), Wiley InterScience (1966 to 31 January 2012), International Clinical Trials Registry Platform (31 January 2012) and reference lists of retrieved studies. We also contacted organisations, individual experts working in the field, and medicinal herb manufacturers. SELECTION CRITERIA: Randomised or quasi-randomised controlled trials that compared Chinese herbal medicines (alone or combined with other pharmaceuticals) with placebo, no treatment (including bed rest), or other pharmaceuticals as treatments for threatened miscarriage. DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS: Two review authors independently assessed all the studies for inclusion in the review, assessed risk of bias and extracted the data. Data were checked for accuracy. MAIN RESULTS: In total, we included 44 randomised clinical trials with 5100 participants in the review.We did not identify any trials which used placebo or no treatment (including bed rest) as a control.The rate of effectiveness (continuation of pregnancy after 28 weeks of gestation) was not significantly different between the Chinese herbal medicines alone group compared with the group of women receiving Western medicines alone (average risk ratio (RR) 1.23; 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.96 to 1.57; one trial, 60 women).Chinese herbal medicines combined with Western medicines were more effective than Western medicines alone to continue the pregnancy beyond 28 weeks of gestation (average RR 1.28; 95% CI 1.18 to 1.38; five trials, 550 women). AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS: There was insufficient evidence to assess the effectiveness of Chinese herbal medicines alone for treating threatened miscarriage.A combination of Chinese herbal and Western medicines was more effective than Western medicines alone for treating threatened miscarriage. However, the quality of the included studies was poor. More high quality studies are necessary to further evaluate the effectiveness of Chinese herbal medicines for threatened miscarriage.
背景:在所有妊娠中,先兆流产的发生率为10%至15%。妊娠早期出现阴道点滴出血或出血很常见,其中近一半的妊娠会导致妊娠丢失。迄今为止,尚无有效的先兆流产预防性治疗方法。几个世纪以来,中草药在亚洲国家被广泛使用,近年来已成为西药的一种流行替代物。许多研究声称表明它们可以预防流产。然而,尚未对中草药治疗先兆流产的有效性进行系统评价。 目的:综述中草药治疗先兆流产的疗效。 检索方法:我们检索了Cochrane妊娠与分娩组试验注册库(2012年1月31日)、中国生物医学数据库(1978年至2012年1月31日)、中国期刊网(1915年至2012年1月31日)、中国知网(1915年至2012年1月31日)、万方数据库(1980年至2012年1月31日)、中国临床试验注册中心(2012年1月31日)、EMBASE(1980年至2012年1月31日)、CINAHL(2012年1月31日)、PubMed(1980年至2012年1月31日)、Wiley InterScience(1966年至2012年1月31日)、国际临床试验注册平台(2012年1月31日)以及检索到的研究的参考文献列表。我们还联系了相关组织、该领域的个体专家以及草药制造商。 选择标准:比较中草药(单独使用或与其他药物联合使用)与安慰剂、不治疗(包括卧床休息)或其他药物作为先兆流产治疗方法的随机或半随机对照试验。 数据收集与分析:两位综述作者独立评估所有纳入综述的研究,评估偏倚风险并提取数据。对数据进行准确性检查。 主要结果:我们共纳入了44项随机临床试验,5100名参与者。我们未发现任何使用安慰剂或不治疗(包括卧床休息)作为对照的试验。单独使用中草药组与单独接受西药治疗的女性组相比,妊娠成功率(妊娠28周后继续妊娠)无显著差异(平均风险比(RR)1.23;95%置信区间(CI)0.96至1.57;一项试验,60名女性)。中草药与西药联合使用在使妊娠持续超过28周方面比单独使用西药更有效(平均RR 1.28;95%CI 1.18至1.38;五项试验,550名女性)。 作者结论:没有足够的证据评估单独使用中草药治疗先兆流产的有效性。中草药与西药联合使用在治疗先兆流产方面比单独使用西药更有效。然而,纳入研究的质量较差。需要更多高质量的研究来进一步评估中草药治疗先兆流产的有效性。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2012-5-16
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2016-1-14
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2021-4-19
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2016-5-6
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2025-6-11
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2021-6-1
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2020-1-9
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2018-2-6
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2021-4-19
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2016-1-14
Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand. 2023-6
Front Pharmacol. 2023-2-14
Evid Based Complement Alternat Med. 2019-1-16
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2016-5-6
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2016-1-14
Pediatr Res. 2016-4
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2011-3-16
Curr Med Chem. 2010
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2010-5-12
Maturitas. 2009-12-14
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2008-4-16
Zhongguo Zhong Xi Yi Jie He Za Zhi. 2007-11
Singapore Med J. 2007-12