• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

在 EPR 设置中的 N 人量子博弈。

N-player quantum games in an EPR setting.

机构信息

School of Electrical and Electronic Engineering, University of Adelaide, Adelaide, South Australia, Australia.

出版信息

PLoS One. 2012;7(5):e36404. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0036404. Epub 2012 May 11.

DOI:10.1371/journal.pone.0036404
PMID:22606258
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC3350539/
Abstract

The N-player quantum games are analyzed that use an Einstein-Podolsky-Rosen (EPR) experiment, as the underlying physical setup. In this setup, a player's strategies are not unitary transformations as in alternate quantum game-theoretic frameworks, but a classical choice between two directions along which spin or polarization measurements are made. The players' strategies thus remain identical to their strategies in the mixed-strategy version of the classical game. In the EPR setting the quantum game reduces itself to the corresponding classical game when the shared quantum state reaches zero entanglement. We find the relations for the probability distribution for N-qubit GHZ and W-type states, subject to general measurement directions, from which the expressions for the players' payoffs and mixed Nash equilibrium are determined. Players' N x N payoff matrices are then defined using linear functions so that common two-player games can be easily extended to the N-player case and permit analytic expressions for the Nash equilibrium. As a specific example, we solve the Prisoners' Dilemma game for general N ≥ 2. We find a new property for the game that for an even number of players the payoffs at the Nash equilibrium are equal, whereas for an odd number of players the cooperating players receive higher payoffs. By dispensing with the standard unitary transformations on state vectors in Hilbert space and using instead rotors and multivectors, based on Clifford's geometric algebra (GA), it is shown how the N-player case becomes tractable. The new mathematical approach presented here has wide implications in the areas of quantum information and quantum complexity, as it opens up a powerful way to tractably analyze N-partite qubit interactions.

摘要

我们分析了使用爱因斯坦-波多尔斯基-罗森(Einstein-Podolsky-Rosen,EPR)实验作为基础物理设置的 N 人量子博弈。在这种设置中,玩家的策略不是交替量子博弈论框架中的幺正变换,而是在自旋或极化测量的两个方向之间进行经典选择。因此,玩家的策略与他们在经典游戏的混合策略版本中的策略相同。在 EPR 设置中,当共享量子态达到零纠缠时,量子博弈就简化为相应的经典博弈。我们找到在一般测量方向下,N 量子 GHZ 和 W 态的概率分布的关系,从而确定玩家的收益和混合纳什均衡的表达式。然后,我们使用线性函数定义玩家的 N x N 收益矩阵,以便可以轻松地将常见的两人游戏扩展到 N 人游戏,并允许为纳什均衡提供解析表达式。作为一个具体的例子,我们为一般的 N ≥ 2 解决了囚徒困境游戏。我们发现该游戏的一个新特性,即对于偶数个玩家,纳什均衡的收益相等,而对于奇数个玩家,合作玩家的收益更高。通过放弃希尔伯特空间中状态向量的标准幺正变换,而代之以基于 Clifford 几何代数(geometric algebra,GA)的转子和多向量,我们展示了如何使 N 人案例变得易于处理。这里提出的新数学方法在量子信息和量子复杂性领域具有广泛的意义,因为它为可分析地分析 N 部分量子比特相互作用提供了一种强大的方法。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/fa3c/3350539/b6e42e83bbf0/pone.0036404.g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/fa3c/3350539/b54d1ff86af4/pone.0036404.g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/fa3c/3350539/b6e42e83bbf0/pone.0036404.g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/fa3c/3350539/b54d1ff86af4/pone.0036404.g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/fa3c/3350539/b6e42e83bbf0/pone.0036404.g002.jpg

相似文献

1
N-player quantum games in an EPR setting.在 EPR 设置中的 N 人量子博弈。
PLoS One. 2012;7(5):e36404. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0036404. Epub 2012 May 11.
2
Analysis of two-player quantum games in an EPR setting using Clifford's geometric algebra.使用 Clifford 几何代数分析 EPR 设置中的两人量子博弈。
PLoS One. 2012;7(1):e29015. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0029015. Epub 2012 Jan 18.
3
Analyzing three-player quantum games in an EPR type setup.分析 EPR 型设置中的三人量子博弈。
PLoS One. 2011;6(7):e21623. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0021623. Epub 2011 Jul 27.
4
Zero-determinant strategies in finitely repeated games.有限重复博弈中的零行列式策略。
J Theor Biol. 2018 Feb 7;438:61-77. doi: 10.1016/j.jtbi.2017.11.002. Epub 2017 Nov 14.
5
Payoff landscapes and the robustness of selfish optimization in iterated games.迭代博弈中的收益景观和自利优化的稳健性。
J Math Biol. 2022 May 12;84(6):55. doi: 10.1007/s00285-022-01758-8.
6
Constructing quantum games from nonfactorizable joint probabilities.从不可分解的联合概率构建量子博弈。
Phys Rev E Stat Nonlin Soft Matter Phys. 2007 Dec;76(6 Pt 1):061122. doi: 10.1103/PhysRevE.76.061122. Epub 2007 Dec 20.
7
Best Reply Player Against Mixed Evolutionarily Stable Strategy User.最佳回复玩家对抗混合进化稳定策略用户。
Bull Math Biol. 2021 Dec 24;84(1):23. doi: 10.1007/s11538-021-00980-7.
8
Linear algebraic structure of zero-determinant strategies in repeated games.重复博弈中零行列式策略的线性代数结构。
PLoS One. 2020 Apr 2;15(4):e0230973. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0230973. eCollection 2020.
9
Structure coefficients and strategy selection in multiplayer games.多人游戏中的结构系数与策略选择。
J Math Biol. 2016 Jan;72(1-2):203-38. doi: 10.1007/s00285-015-0882-3. Epub 2015 Apr 5.
10
Autocratic strategies for iterated games with arbitrary action spaces.具有任意行动空间的重复博弈的独裁策略。
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2016 Mar 29;113(13):3573-8. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1520163113. Epub 2016 Mar 14.

引用本文的文献

1
On the equivalence between non-factorizable mixed-strategy classical games and quantum games.关于不可分解混合策略经典博弈与量子博弈之间的等价性
R Soc Open Sci. 2016 Jan 27;3(1):150477. doi: 10.1098/rsos.150477. eCollection 2016 Jan.
2
Effects of adaptive degrees of trust on coevolution of quantum strategies on scale-free networks.信任适应度对无标度网络上量子策略协同进化的影响。
Sci Rep. 2013 Oct 15;3:2949. doi: 10.1038/srep02949.
3
Coevolution of quantum and classical strategies on evolving random networks.量子和经典策略在演化随机网络上的共同进化。

本文引用的文献

1
Analysis of two-player quantum games in an EPR setting using Clifford's geometric algebra.使用 Clifford 几何代数分析 EPR 设置中的两人量子博弈。
PLoS One. 2012;7(1):e29015. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0029015. Epub 2012 Jan 18.
2
Effects of dynamical grouping on cooperation in N-person evolutionary snowdrift game.动态分组对N人进化雪堆博弈中合作的影响。
Phys Rev E Stat Nonlin Soft Matter Phys. 2011 Sep;84(3 Pt 2):036113. doi: 10.1103/PhysRevE.84.036113. Epub 2011 Sep 20.
3
Analyzing three-player quantum games in an EPR type setup.
PLoS One. 2013 Jul 12;8(7):e68423. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0068423. Print 2013.
分析 EPR 型设置中的三人量子博弈。
PLoS One. 2011;6(7):e21623. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0021623. Epub 2011 Jul 27.
4
Constructing quantum games from nonfactorizable joint probabilities.从不可分解的联合概率构建量子博弈。
Phys Rev E Stat Nonlin Soft Matter Phys. 2007 Dec;76(6 Pt 1):061122. doi: 10.1103/PhysRevE.76.061122. Epub 2007 Dec 20.
5
Experimental realization of quantum games on a quantum computer.量子计算机上量子博弈的实验实现。
Phys Rev Lett. 2002 Apr 1;88(13):137902. doi: 10.1103/PhysRevLett.88.137902. Epub 2002 Mar 12.
6
Optimal extraction of information from finite quantum ensembles.从有限量子系综中最优提取信息。
Phys Rev Lett. 1995 Feb 20;74(8):1259-1263. doi: 10.1103/PhysRevLett.74.1259.
7
Extreme quantum entanglement in a superposition of macroscopically distinct states.宏观上不同状态叠加中的极端量子纠缠。
Phys Rev Lett. 1990 Oct 8;65(15):1838-1840. doi: 10.1103/PhysRevLett.65.1838.
8
Multi-player matrix games.多人矩阵游戏。
Bull Math Biol. 1997 Sep;59(5):931-52. doi: 10.1007/BF02460000.