Department of Radiation Therapy, BC Cancer Agency, Vancouver Centre, Vancouver, Canada.
Radiat Oncol. 2012 May 18;7:73. doi: 10.1186/1748-717X-7-73.
The primary objective of this research was to assess the relationship between FPs' knowledge of palliative radiotherapy (RT) and referral for palliative RT.
1001 surveys were sent to FPs who work in urban, suburban, and rural practices. Respondents were tested on their knowledge of palliative radiotherapy effectiveness and asked to report their self-assessed knowledge.
The response rate was 33%. FPs mean score testing their knowledge of palliative radiotherapy effectiveness was 68% (SD = 26%). The majority of FPs correctly identified that painful bone metastases (91%), airway obstruction (77%), painful local disease (85%), brain metastases (76%) and spinal cord compression (79%) can be effectively treated with RT, though few were aware that hemoptysis (42%) and hematuria (31%) can be effectively treated. There was a linear relationship between increasing involvement in palliative care and both self-assessed (p < 0.001) and tested (p = 0.02) knowledge. FPs had higher mean knowledge scores if they received post-MD training in palliative care (12% higher; p < 0.001) or radiotherapy (15% higher; p = 0.002). There was a strong relationship between FPs referral for palliative radiotherapy and both self-assessed knowledge (p < 0.001) and tested knowledge (p = 0.01).
Self-assessed and tested knowledge of palliative RT is positively associated with referral for palliative RT. Since palliative RT is underutilized, further research is needed to assess whether family physician educational interventions improve palliative RT referrals. The current study suggests that studies could target family physicians already in practice, with educational interventions focusing on hemostatic and other less commonly known indications for palliative RT.
本研究的主要目的是评估家庭医生对姑息性放疗(RT)的了解程度与姑息性 RT 转诊之间的关系。
向在城市、郊区和农村执业的家庭医生发送了 1001 份调查问卷。受访者接受了姑息性放疗效果的知识测试,并被要求报告他们的自我评估知识。
回应率为 33%。家庭医生姑息性放疗效果知识测试的平均得分为 68%(SD=26%)。大多数家庭医生正确地认为,疼痛性骨转移(91%)、气道阻塞(77%)、疼痛性局部疾病(85%)、脑转移(76%)和脊髓压迫(79%)可以通过 RT 有效治疗,尽管很少有人意识到咯血(42%)和血尿(31%)也可以通过 RT 有效治疗。家庭医生参与姑息治疗的程度越高,他们的自我评估(p<0.001)和测试(p=0.02)知识也越高。如果家庭医生接受过姑息治疗(高 12%;p<0.001)或放疗(高 15%;p=0.002)的 MD 后培训,他们的知识得分也更高。家庭医生姑息性 RT 转诊与自我评估知识(p<0.001)和测试知识(p=0.01)之间存在很强的相关性。
姑息性 RT 的自我评估和测试知识与姑息性 RT 转诊呈正相关。由于姑息性 RT 的利用率较低,需要进一步研究评估家庭医生教育干预是否能提高姑息性 RT 转诊率。本研究表明,研究可以针对已经在实践中的家庭医生,教育干预的重点是止血和其他不太常见的姑息性 RT 适应证。