Sharma U K, Shrestha B K, Rijal S, Bijukachhe B, Barakoti R, Banskota B, Pradhan I, Banskota A K
Department of Radiology, B&B Teaching Hospital, Latilpur, Nepal.
Kathmandu Univ Med J (KUMJ). 2011 Jul-Sep;9(35):174-8. doi: 10.3126/kumj.v9i3.6300.
The traumatic or degenerative internal derangement of the knee requires certain investigations for the establishment of diagnosis, in addition to clinical history and a thorough physical examination. The use of arthrography and arthroscopy improves the accuracy of the diagnosis. MRI scanning of the knee joint has often been regarded as the noninvasive alternative to diagnostic arthroscopy.
The purpose of the study was to correlate clinical and low field MRI findings with arthroscopy in internal derangement of the knee.
Forty one patients with suspected internal derangement of the knee were subjected to MR examination followed by arthroscopy. Clinical criteria used were history, mode of injury, Mc Murray, Apley grinding, Thessaly test for meniscal injury. Drawer test was considered to be essential for clinical diagnosis of cruciate ligament injury. MRI of the knee was performed in low field open magnet (0.35T, Magnetom C, Seimens). Arthroscopy was done within two months of MR examination and was considered gold standard for the internal derangement of the knee.
The sensitivity, specificity, diagnostic accuracy of clinical examination were 96.1%, 33.3% and 73.1% respectively for medial meniscal tear; 38.4%, 96.4% and 78.1% respectively for lateral meniscal tear. The sensitivity, specificity, diagnostic accuracy of MRI were 92.3%,100% and 95.1% for medial meniscal tear; 84.6%96.4% and 92.6% respectively for lateral meniscal tear.
Clinical examination showed higher sensitivity for medial meniscal tear compared to MRI, however with low specificity and diagnostic accuracy. Low field MRI showed high sensitivity, specificity, diagnostic accuracy for meniscal and cruciate ligament injury, in addition to associated derangement like articular cartilage damage, synovial thickening.
除临床病史和全面的体格检查外,膝关节的创伤性或退行性内部紊乱需要进行某些检查以确立诊断。关节造影和关节镜检查的应用提高了诊断的准确性。膝关节的磁共振成像(MRI)扫描常被视为诊断性关节镜检查的非侵入性替代方法。
本研究的目的是将膝关节内部紊乱的临床和低场MRI表现与关节镜检查结果进行对比。
41例疑似膝关节内部紊乱的患者先接受MR检查,随后进行关节镜检查。使用的临床标准包括病史、损伤方式、麦克马瑞试验、阿普利研磨试验、用于半月板损伤的 Thessaly 试验。抽屉试验被认为是十字韧带损伤临床诊断的关键。膝关节MRI检查采用低场开放式磁体(0.35T,西门子 Magnetom C)。关节镜检查在MR检查后的两个月内进行,并被视为膝关节内部紊乱的金标准。
内侧半月板撕裂时,临床检查的敏感性、特异性和诊断准确性分别为96.1%、33.3%和73.1%;外侧半月板撕裂时分别为38.4%、96.4%和78.1%。内侧半月板撕裂时,MRI的敏感性、特异性和诊断准确性分别为92.3%、100%和95.1%;外侧半月板撕裂时分别为84.6%、96.4%和92.6%。
与MRI相比,临床检查对内侧半月板撕裂显示出更高的敏感性,但特异性和诊断准确性较低。低场MRI对半月板和十字韧带损伤以及诸如关节软骨损伤、滑膜增厚等相关紊乱显示出高敏感性、特异性和诊断准确性。