Sharifah M I A, Lee C L, Suraya A, Johan A, Syed A F S K, Tan S P
Department of Radiology, University Kebangsaan Malaysia, Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia,
Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. 2015 Mar;23(3):826-30. doi: 10.1007/s00167-013-2766-7. Epub 2013 Nov 17.
This study was conducted to evaluate the accuracy of magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) in diagnosing meniscal tears in patients with anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) tears and to determine the frequency of missed meniscal tears on MRI.
This prospective comparative study was conducted from 2009 to 2012. Patients with ACL injuries who underwent knee arthroscopy and MRI were included in the study. Two radiologists who were blinded to the clinical history and arthroscopic findings reviewed the pre-arthroscopic MR images. The presence and type of meniscal tears on MRI and arthroscopy were recorded. Arthroscopic findings were used as the reference standard. The accuracy, sensitivity, specificity, negative predictive value (NPV), and positive predictive value (PPV) of MRI in the evaluation of meniscal tears were calculated.
A total of 65 patients (66 knees) were included. The sensitivity, specificity, accuracy, PPV, and NPV for the MRI diagnosis of lateral meniscal tears in our patients were 83, 97, 92, 96, and 90 %, respectively, whereas those for medial meniscus tears were 82, 92, 88, 82, and 88 %, respectively. There were five false-negative diagnoses of medial meniscus tears and four false-negative diagnoses of lateral meniscus tears. The majority of missed meniscus tears on MRI affected the peripheral posterior horns.
The sensitivity for diagnosing a meniscal tear was significantly higher when the tear involved more than one-third of the meniscus or the anterior horn. The sensitivity was significantly lower for tears located in the posterior horn and for vertically oriented tears. Therefore, special attention should be given to the peripheral posterior horns of the meniscus, which are common sites of injury that could be easily missed on MRI. The high NPVs obtained in this study suggest that MRI is a valuable tool prior to arthroscopy.
本研究旨在评估磁共振成像(MRI)诊断前交叉韧带(ACL)损伤患者半月板撕裂的准确性,并确定MRI漏诊半月板撕裂的频率。
本前瞻性比较研究于2009年至2012年进行。纳入接受膝关节镜检查和MRI的ACL损伤患者。两名对临床病史和关节镜检查结果不知情的放射科医生对关节镜检查前的MR图像进行了评估。记录MRI和关节镜检查中半月板撕裂的存在情况和类型。以关节镜检查结果作为参考标准。计算MRI评估半月板撕裂的准确性、敏感性、特异性、阴性预测值(NPV)和阳性预测值(PPV)。
共纳入65例患者(66个膝关节)。在我们的患者中,MRI诊断外侧半月板撕裂的敏感性、特异性、准确性、PPV和NPV分别为83%、97%、92%、96%和90%,而内侧半月板撕裂的相应数值分别为82%、92%、88%、82%和88%。内侧半月板撕裂有5例假阴性诊断,外侧半月板撕裂有4例假阴性诊断。MRI上大多数漏诊的半月板撕裂影响半月板的外周后角。
当半月板撕裂累及超过三分之一或前角时,诊断半月板撕裂的敏感性显著更高。位于后角的撕裂和垂直方向的撕裂敏感性显著更低。因此,应特别关注半月板的外周后角,这是容易在MRI上漏诊的常见损伤部位。本研究中获得的高NPV表明,MRI是关节镜检查前的一种有价值的工具。