Department of Medicine, Division of Pulmonary and Critical Care Medicine, University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, CA, USA.
Crit Care Med. 2012 Jun;40(6):1731-7. doi: 10.1097/CCM.0b013e3182451c87.
Angiopoietin-2 is a proinflammatory mediator of endothelial injury in animal models, and increased plasma angiopoietin-2 levels are associated with poor outcomes in patients with sepsis-associated acute lung injury. Whether angiopoietin-2 levels are modified by treatment strategies in patients with acute lung injury is unknown.
To determine whether plasma angiopoietin-2 levels are associated with clinical outcomes and affected by fluid management strategy in a broad cohort of patients with acute lung injury.
DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS: Plasma levels of angiopoietin-2 and von Willebrand factor (a traditional marker of endothelial injury) were measured in 931 subjects with acute lung injury enrolled in a randomized trial of fluid liberal vs. fluid conservative management.
The presence of infection (sepsis or pneumonia) as the primary acute lung injury risk factor significantly modified the relationship between baseline angiopoietin-2 levels and mortality (p = .01 for interaction). In noninfection-related acute lung injury, higher baseline angiopoietin-2 levels were strongly associated with increased mortality (odds ratio, 2.43 per 1-log increase in angiopoietin-2; 95% confidence interval, 1.57-3.75; p < .001). In infection-related acute lung injury, baseline angiopoietin-2 levels were similarly elevated in survivors and nonsurvivors; however, patients whose plasma angiopoietin-2 levels increased from day 0 to day 3 had more than double the odds of death compared with patients whose angiopoietin-2 levels declined over the same period of time (odds ratio, 2.29; 95% confidence interval, 1.54-3.43; p < .001). Fluid-conservative therapy led to a 15% greater decline in angiopoietin-2 levels from day 0 to day 3 (95% confidence interval, 4.6-24.8%; p = .006) compared with fluid-liberal therapy in patients with infection-related acute lung injury. In contrast, plasma levels of von Willebrand factor were significantly associated with mortality in both infection-related and noninfection-related acute lung injury and were not affected by fluid therapy.
Unlike von Willebrand factor, plasma angiopoietin-2 has differential prognostic value for mortality depending on the presence or absence of infection as an acute lung injury risk factor. Fluid conservative therapy preferentially lowers plasma angiopoietin-2 levels over time and thus may be beneficial in part by decreasing endothelial inflammation.
在动物模型中,血管生成素-2 是内皮损伤的促炎介质,并且血浆血管生成素-2 水平升高与脓毒症相关急性肺损伤患者的不良结局相关。在急性肺损伤患者中,血管生成素-2 水平是否通过治疗策略进行修饰尚不清楚。
确定在急性肺损伤的广泛患者队列中,血浆血管生成素-2 水平是否与临床结局相关,并受液体管理策略的影响。
设计、地点和参与者:在一项关于液体自由与液体保守管理的随机试验中,共纳入了 931 名急性肺损伤患者,测量了他们的血管生成素-2 和血管性血友病因子(内皮损伤的传统标志物)的血浆水平。
感染(败血症或肺炎)作为急性肺损伤的主要危险因素,显著改变了基线血管生成素-2 水平与死亡率之间的关系(交互作用 p =.01)。在非感染相关的急性肺损伤中,较高的基线血管生成素-2 水平与死亡率升高强烈相关(血管生成素-2 每增加 1 个对数增加 2.43 倍;95%置信区间,1.57-3.75;p <.001)。在感染相关的急性肺损伤中,存活者和非存活者的基线血管生成素-2 水平同样升高;然而,与同一时期血管生成素-2 水平下降的患者相比,血管生成素-2 水平从第 0 天到第 3 天升高的患者死亡的可能性高出两倍以上(比值比,2.29;95%置信区间,1.54-3.43;p <.001)。与液体自由治疗相比,在感染相关的急性肺损伤患者中,液体保守治疗可导致第 0 天至第 3 天的血管生成素-2 水平下降 15%(95%置信区间,4.6-24.8%;p =.006)。相比之下,血管性血友病因子与感染相关和非感染相关的急性肺损伤患者的死亡率均显著相关,且不受液体治疗的影响。
与血管性血友病因子不同,血管生成素-2 的血浆水平对死亡率具有不同的预后价值,这取决于感染是否为急性肺损伤的危险因素。随着时间的推移,液体保守治疗优先降低血管生成素-2 水平,因此通过降低内皮炎症可能部分有益。