Division of Pulmonary Medicine, Department of Pediatrics, University of California, San Francisco, California, USA.
Crit Care Med. 2010 Sep;38(9):1845-51. doi: 10.1097/CCM.0b013e3181eaa5bf.
To test the hypothesis that the concentration of angiopoietin-2 relative to angiopoietin-1 may be a useful biological marker of mortality in acute lung injury patients. We also tested the association of concentration of angiopoietin-2 relative to angiopoietin-1 with physiologic and biological markers of activated endothelium.
Prospective, observational cohort study.
Intensive care units in a tertiary care university hospital and a university-affiliated city hospital.
Fifty-six mechanically ventilated patients with acute lung injury.
Baseline plasma samples and pulmonary dead-space fraction measurements were collected within 48 hrs of acute lung injury diagnosis.
Plasma levels of angiopoietin-1 and angiopoietin-2 and of biomarkers of endothelial activation were measured by enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay. Baseline concentration of angiopoietin-2 relative to angiopoietin-1 was significantly higher in patients who died (median, 58 [interquartile range, 17-117] vs. 14 [interquartile range, 6-35]; p = .01). In a multivariable analysis stratified by dead-space fraction, concentration of angiopoietin-2 relative to angiopoietin-1 was an independent predictor of death, with an adjusted odds ratio of 4.3 (95% confidence interval, 1.3-13.5; p = .01) in those with an elevated pulmonary dead-space fraction (p = .03 for interaction between pulmonary dead-space fraction and concentration of angiopoietin-2 relative to angiopoietin-1). Moderate to weak correlation was found with biological markers of endothelial activation.
The ratio of concentration of angiopoietin-2 relative to angiopoietin-1 may be a prognostic biomarker of endothelial activation in acute lung injury patients and, along with pulmonary dead-space fraction, may be useful for risk stratification of acute lung injury patients, particularly in identifying subgroups for future research and therapeutic trials.
验证假设,即血管生成素-2 与血管生成素-1 的浓度比值可能是急性肺损伤患者死亡率的有用生物标志物。我们还测试了血管生成素-2 与血管生成素-1 的浓度比值与激活内皮细胞的生理和生物标志物的相关性。
前瞻性观察队列研究。
一所三级保健大学医院和一所大学附属医院的重症监护病房。
56 例机械通气的急性肺损伤患者。
在急性肺损伤诊断后 48 小时内采集基线血浆样本和肺死腔分数测量值。
通过酶联免疫吸附试验测量血管生成素-1 和血管生成素-2 的血浆水平以及内皮细胞激活的生物标志物。死亡患者的基线血管生成素-2 与血管生成素-1 的浓度比值明显更高(中位数,58[四分位距,17-117] vs. 14[四分位距,6-35];p =.01)。在按死腔分数分层的多变量分析中,血管生成素-2 与血管生成素-1 的浓度比值是死亡的独立预测因子,在肺死腔分数升高的患者中,调整后的比值比为 4.3(95%置信区间,1.3-13.5;p =.01)(p =.03 用于肺死腔分数与血管生成素-2 与血管生成素-1 的浓度比值之间的交互作用)。与内皮细胞激活的生物标志物存在中等至弱相关性。
血管生成素-2 与血管生成素-1 的浓度比值可能是急性肺损伤患者内皮细胞激活的预后生物标志物,与肺死腔分数一起,可能有助于急性肺损伤患者的风险分层,特别是在确定未来研究和治疗试验的亚组方面。