Suppr超能文献

重新审视婚姻问题:结合形式与幸福感的变化

Re-Examining the Case for Marriage: Union Formation and Changes in Well-Being.

作者信息

Musick Kelly, Bumpass Larry

机构信息

Department of Policy Analysis and Management, Cornell University, 254 Martha Van Rensselaer Hall, Ithaca, NY 14853-4401 (

出版信息

J Marriage Fam. 2012 Feb 1;74(1):1-18. doi: 10.1111/j.1741-3737.2011.00873.x. Epub 2012 Jan 11.

Abstract

This article addresses open questions about the nature and meaning of the positive association between marriage and well-being, namely, the extent to which it is causal, shared with cohabitation, and stable over time. We relied on data from the National Survey of Families and Households (N = 2,737) and a modeling approach that controls for fixed differences between individuals by relating union transitions to changes in well-being. This study is unique in examining the persistence of changes in well-being as marriages and cohabitations progress (and potentially dissolve) over time. The effects of marriage and cohabitation are found to be similar across a range of measures tapping psychological well-being, health, and social ties. Where there are statistically significant differences, marriage is not always more advantageous. Overall, differences tend to be small and appear to dissipate over time, even when the greater instability of cohabitation is taken into account.

摘要

本文探讨了关于婚姻与幸福之间正相关关系的性质和意义的一些开放性问题,即这种关系在多大程度上是因果关系、与同居关系有何共同之处以及随时间推移是否稳定。我们依赖于全国家庭调查的数据(N = 2737)以及一种建模方法,该方法通过将婚姻状况转变与幸福程度变化联系起来,控制个体之间的固定差异。本研究在考察随着婚姻和同居关系随时间推移(并可能解体)幸福程度变化的持续性方面具有独特性。研究发现,在一系列衡量心理健康、健康状况和社会关系的指标上,婚姻和同居的影响相似。在存在统计学显著差异的情况下,婚姻并不总是更具优势。总体而言,差异往往较小,而且即使考虑到同居关系更大的不稳定性,随着时间推移差异似乎也会消失。

相似文献

1
Re-Examining the Case for Marriage: Union Formation and Changes in Well-Being.
J Marriage Fam. 2012 Feb 1;74(1):1-18. doi: 10.1111/j.1741-3737.2011.00873.x. Epub 2012 Jan 11.
2
Trends in Cohabitation Outcomes: Compositional Changes and Engagement Among Never-Married Young Adults.
J Marriage Fam. 2014 Aug;76(4):826-842. doi: 10.1111/jomf.12123. Epub 2014 Jul 3.
3
The Social Significance of Interracial Cohabitation: Inferences Based on Fertility Behavior.
Demography. 2020 Oct;57(5):1727-1751. doi: 10.1007/s13524-020-00904-5.
5
National estimates of cohabitation.
Demography. 1989 Nov;26(4):615-25.
8
Two Decades of Stability and Change in Age at First Union Formation.
J Marriage Fam. 2014 Apr 1;76(2):247-260. doi: 10.1111/jomf.12090.
9
Union Transitions Following the Birth of a Child to Cohabiting Parents.
Popul Res Policy Rev. 2012 Jun;31(3):361-386. doi: 10.1007/s11113-012-9231-z. Epub 2012 Mar 29.
10
MARRIAGE AND DISSOLUTION AMONG WOMEN'S COHABITATIONS: VARIATIONS BY STEPFAMILY STATUS AND SHARED CHILDBEARING.
J Fam Issues. 2018;39(4):1108-1136. doi: 10.1177/0192513X16686136. Epub 2017 Jan 6.

引用本文的文献

1
Interracial Couples at Risk: Discrimination, Well-Being, and Health.
J Fam Issues. 2024 Feb;45(2):303-325. doi: 10.1177/0192513x221150994. Epub 2023 Jan 12.
3
Well-being balance and lived experiences: understanding the impact of life situations on human flourishing.
Front Psychiatry. 2025 Jan 31;15:1516729. doi: 10.3389/fpsyt.2024.1516729. eCollection 2024.
4
Time-Varying Correlates of Adult Singlehood: Education, Work, Living Arrangements, and Mental Health.
Res Hum Dev. 2024;21(1):88-104. doi: 10.1080/15427609.2024.2345543. Epub 2024 Apr 29.
5
Living Apart Together and Depressive Symptoms in Older Adulthood.
Marriage Fam Rev. 2024;60(2):109-132. doi: 10.1080/01494929.2024.2312371. Epub 2024 Feb 12.
7
Diminished psychedelic returns on distress: Marital status and household size.
PLoS One. 2024 Mar 7;19(3):e0293675. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0293675. eCollection 2024.
8
Are Interracial Couples at Higher Risk of Multiple Chronic Conditions? Evidence from a Nationally Representative Sample.
J Racial Ethn Health Disparities. 2025 Apr;12(2):1184-1194. doi: 10.1007/s40615-024-01952-y. Epub 2024 Feb 21.
9
Differences in Minority Stress Experiences, Mental Health, and Relationship Quality Outcomes Among Bisexual, Pansexual, and Queer Women.
Arch Sex Behav. 2024 Apr;53(4):1255-1263. doi: 10.1007/s10508-023-02771-8. Epub 2023 Dec 27.

本文引用的文献

1
The Role of Cohabitation in Family Formation: The United States in Comparative Perspective.
J Marriage Fam. 2004 Dec 1;66(5):1214-1230. doi: 10.1111/j.0022-2445.2004.00088.x.
2
As Good as it Gets? A Life Course Perspective on Marital Quality.
Soc Forces. 2005 Sep;84(1):493-511. doi: 10.1353/sof.2005.0131.
3
Clarifying the relationship between parenthood and depression.
J Health Soc Behav. 2005 Dec;46(4):341-58. doi: 10.1177/002214650504600403.
4
American marriage in the early twenty-first century.
Future Child. 2005 Fall;15(2):33-55. doi: 10.1353/foc.2005.0015.
5
Marriage as a public issue.
Future Child. 2005 Fall;15(2):13-32. doi: 10.1353/foc.2005.0019.
6
Remarks on the analysis of causal relationships in population research.
Demography. 2005 Feb;42(1):91-108. doi: 10.1353/dem.2005.0006.
7
Gender differences in the marriage and cohabitation income premium.
Demography. 2004 May;41(2):263-84. doi: 10.1353/dem.2004.0016.
8
Marital status, marital transitions, and health: a gendered life course perspective.
J Health Soc Behav. 2004 Mar;45(1):81-98. doi: 10.1177/002214650404500106.
10
Reexamining adaptation and the set point model of happiness: reactions to changes in marital status.
J Pers Soc Psychol. 2003 Mar;84(3):527-39. doi: 10.1037//0022-3514.84.3.527.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验