Musick Kelly, Bumpass Larry
Department of Policy Analysis and Management, Cornell University, 254 Martha Van Rensselaer Hall, Ithaca, NY 14853-4401 (
J Marriage Fam. 2012 Feb 1;74(1):1-18. doi: 10.1111/j.1741-3737.2011.00873.x. Epub 2012 Jan 11.
This article addresses open questions about the nature and meaning of the positive association between marriage and well-being, namely, the extent to which it is causal, shared with cohabitation, and stable over time. We relied on data from the National Survey of Families and Households (N = 2,737) and a modeling approach that controls for fixed differences between individuals by relating union transitions to changes in well-being. This study is unique in examining the persistence of changes in well-being as marriages and cohabitations progress (and potentially dissolve) over time. The effects of marriage and cohabitation are found to be similar across a range of measures tapping psychological well-being, health, and social ties. Where there are statistically significant differences, marriage is not always more advantageous. Overall, differences tend to be small and appear to dissipate over time, even when the greater instability of cohabitation is taken into account.
本文探讨了关于婚姻与幸福之间正相关关系的性质和意义的一些开放性问题,即这种关系在多大程度上是因果关系、与同居关系有何共同之处以及随时间推移是否稳定。我们依赖于全国家庭调查的数据(N = 2737)以及一种建模方法,该方法通过将婚姻状况转变与幸福程度变化联系起来,控制个体之间的固定差异。本研究在考察随着婚姻和同居关系随时间推移(并可能解体)幸福程度变化的持续性方面具有独特性。研究发现,在一系列衡量心理健康、健康状况和社会关系的指标上,婚姻和同居的影响相似。在存在统计学显著差异的情况下,婚姻并不总是更具优势。总体而言,差异往往较小,而且即使考虑到同居关系更大的不稳定性,随着时间推移差异似乎也会消失。