Grimbizis Grigoris F, Campo Rudi
Gynecol Surg. 2012 May;9(2):119-129. doi: 10.1007/s10397-011-0724-2. Epub 2012 Mar 10.
A more objective, accurate and non-invasive estimation of uterine morphology is nowadays feasible based on the use of modern imaging techniques. The validity of the current classification systems in effective categorization of the female genital malformations has been already challenged. A new clinical approach for the classification of uterine anomalies is proposed. Deviation from normal uterine anatomy is the basic characteristic used in analogy to the American Fertility Society classification. The embryological origin of the anomalies is used as a secondary parameter. Uterine anomalies are classified into the following classes: 0, normal uterus; I, dysmorphic uterus; II, septate uterus (absorption defect); III, dysfused uterus (fusion defect); IV, unilateral formed uterus (formation defect); V, aplastic or dysplastic uterus (formation defect); VI, for still unclassified cases. A subdivision of these main classes to further anatomical varieties with clinical significance is also presented. The new proposal has been designed taking into account the experience gained from the use of the currently available classification systems and intending to be as simple as possible, clear enough and accurate as well as open for further development. This proposal could be used as a starting point for a working group of experts in the field.
如今,基于现代成像技术,可以对子宫形态进行更客观、准确且无创的评估。当前分类系统在有效分类女性生殖器畸形方面的有效性已受到挑战。本文提出了一种子宫异常分类的新临床方法。与美国生育协会的分类方法类似,子宫解剖结构偏离正常是该分类方法的基本特征。异常的胚胎学起源作为次要参数。子宫异常分为以下几类:0类,正常子宫;I类,畸形子宫;II类,纵隔子宫(吸收缺陷);III类,融合不全子宫(融合缺陷);IV类,单侧发育子宫(发育缺陷);V类,发育不全或发育异常子宫(发育缺陷);VI类,适用于仍未分类的病例。本文还对这些主要类别进一步细分为具有临床意义的解剖学变体。新提议在设计时考虑了从使用现有分类系统中获得的经验,力求尽可能简单、清晰准确,并为进一步发展留出空间。该提议可作为该领域专家工作组的起点。