University of Southern Mississippi, Anthropology & Sociology, 118 College Dr. #5074, Hattiesburg, MS 39406-0001, USA.
Soc Sci Med. 2012 Aug;75(4):709-16. doi: 10.1016/j.socscimed.2012.03.051. Epub 2012 May 5.
Over the past two decades, research on childbirth worldwide has documented women's varied perceptions of and decision-making regarding childbirth. Scholars have demonstrated the impact of medical authority, religion, perception of risk, and access to care providers on the decisions women make about where to have their babies and with whom. Virtually all research on how women make these choices, however, has focused outside the United States. To address this gap in the literature, we analyze data collected during 2004-2010 through 135 in-depth interviews with women in the U.S. who have had hospital births, homebirths with midwives, and homebirths without professional assistance to explore the factors that led them to the births they had. We supplement these interview data with archival analysis of birth stories and ethnographic data to offer additional insight into women's birth experiences. In our analysis, we utilize Pierre Bourdieu's concepts of "habitus" and "field" to examine the ways women's preferences emerge and how a sense of risk and safety shape their decision-making around pregnancy and parturition. Our findings indicate that while women's birth preferences initially emerge from their habitus, their birth practices are ultimately shaped by broader structural forces, particularly economic position and the availability of birth options.
在过去的二十年中,全球范围内的生育研究记录了女性对生育的不同看法和决策。学者们已经证明了医疗权威、宗教、风险感知以及获得医疗服务提供者的机会对女性决定在哪里生孩子以及与谁生孩子的影响。然而,几乎所有关于女性如何做出这些选择的研究都集中在美国以外的地区。为了填补这一文献空白,我们分析了 2004 年至 2010 年期间通过对在美国分娩的 135 名妇女进行深入访谈收集的数据,这些妇女经历了医院分娩、有合格助产士的家庭分娩和没有专业帮助的家庭分娩,以探讨导致她们选择这些分娩方式的因素。我们还利用出生故事的档案分析和民族志数据来补充这些访谈数据,以提供更多关于女性分娩经历的见解。在我们的分析中,我们利用皮埃尔·布迪厄的“惯习”和“场域”概念来考察女性偏好是如何产生的,以及风险和安全意识如何影响她们在怀孕和分娩期间的决策。我们的研究结果表明,尽管女性的生育偏好最初源于她们的惯习,但她们的生育实践最终受到更广泛的结构力量的影响,特别是经济地位和生育选择的可用性。