• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

[The friction behavior of the ceramic bracket in arch wire-guided tooth movement].

作者信息

Schumacher H A, Bourauel C, Drescher D

机构信息

Poliklinik für Kieferorthopädie, Universität Bonn.

出版信息

Fortschr Kieferorthop. 1990 Oct;51(5):259-65. doi: 10.1007/BF02168926.

DOI:10.1007/BF02168926
PMID:2262178
Abstract

In spite of their wellknown disadvantages ceramic brackets are in great demand by orthodontic patients because of their aesthetic features. The amount of friction produced during tooth movement when a ceramic bracket slides along an arch wire, is still unknown. Using a custom-made friction test device the current study was undertaken to measure friction values of brackets of different manufactures with an 0.018 inch slot sliding along an 0.016 x 0.022 inch stainless steel arch wire. The results of this study showed that stainless steel brackets had slightly lower values than polycrystalline ceramic brackets. The monocrystalline bracket however showed significant greater friction values than both stainless steel and polycrystalline brackets even though its surface, as revealed with the scanning electron microscopy, proved to be quite smooth.

摘要

相似文献

1
[The friction behavior of the ceramic bracket in arch wire-guided tooth movement].
Fortschr Kieferorthop. 1990 Oct;51(5):259-65. doi: 10.1007/BF02168926.
2
Comparative Evaluation of Frictional Resistance Between Different Types of Ceramic Brackets and Stainless Steel Brackets With Teflon-Coated Stainless Steel and Stainless Steel Archwires: An In-Vitro Study.不同类型陶瓷托槽与不锈钢托槽搭配聚四氟乙烯涂层不锈钢丝和不锈钢弓丝之间摩擦阻力的比较评估:一项体外研究。
Cureus. 2022 Apr 15;14(4):e24161. doi: 10.7759/cureus.24161. eCollection 2022 Apr.
3
Evaluation of friction during sliding tooth movement in various bracket-arch wire combinations.不同托槽-弓丝组合滑动牙齿移动过程中摩擦力的评估。
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 1999 Sep;116(3):336-45. doi: 10.1016/s0889-5406(99)70247-7.
4
A comparative study of frictional forces between orthodontic brackets and arch wires.正畸托槽与弓丝之间摩擦力的比较研究。
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 1991 Dec;100(6):513-22. doi: 10.1016/0889-5406(91)70091-A.
5
Frictional resistances using Teflon-coated ligatures with various bracket-archwire combinations.使用涂有特氟龙的结扎丝与各种托槽 - 弓丝组合时的摩擦力。
Angle Orthod. 1995;65(1):63-72; discussion 73-4. doi: 10.1043/0003-3219(1995)065<0063:FRUTLW>2.0.CO;2.
6
Frictional resistance of ceramic and stainless steel orthodontic brackets.陶瓷和不锈钢正畸托槽的摩擦阻力
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 1990 Nov;98(5):398-403. doi: 10.1016/S0889-5406(05)81647-6.
7
Static frictional resistances of polycrystalline ceramic brackets with metal slot inserts.带有金属槽插入物的多晶陶瓷托槽的静摩擦阻力
Aust Orthod J. 2006 Nov;22(2):147-52.
8
Wire friction from ceramic brackets during simulated canine retraction.模拟犬牙后移过程中陶瓷托槽产生的钢丝摩擦力
Angle Orthod. 1991 Winter;61(4):285-90; discussion 291-2. doi: 10.1043/0003-3219(1991)061<0285:WFFCBD>2.0.CO;2.
9
Evaluation of friction between ceramic brackets and orthodontic wires of four alloys.四种合金的陶瓷托槽与正畸钢丝之间摩擦力的评估
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 1990 Dec;98(6):499-506. doi: 10.1016/0889-5406(90)70015-5.
10
Forces in the presence of ceramic versus stainless steel brackets with unconventional vs conventional ligatures.在使用非常规与常规结扎丝的情况下,陶瓷托槽与不锈钢托槽所受的力。
Angle Orthod. 2008 Jan;78(1):120-4. doi: 10.2319/011107-11.1.

引用本文的文献

1
Comparative evaluation of different debonding and reconditioning methods for orthodontic ceramic brackets regarding effectiveness for reuse : An in vitro study.正畸陶瓷托槽不同脱粘和修复方法再利用效果的比较评估:一项体外研究。
J Orofac Orthop. 2025 Jan;86(1):11-23. doi: 10.1007/s00056-023-00469-z. Epub 2023 Jun 15.
2
Friction behavior of the wire material Gummetal®.Gummetal®线材的摩擦行为。
J Orofac Orthop. 2022 Jan;83(1):59-72. doi: 10.1007/s00056-021-00317-y. Epub 2021 Jul 6.
3
Friction behavior of ceramic injection-molded (CIM) brackets.

本文引用的文献

1
The segmented arch approach to space closure.分段牙弓法关闭间隙。
Am J Orthod. 1982 Nov;82(5):361-78. doi: 10.1016/0002-9416(82)90185-3.
2
Canine retraction with the edgewise appliance-some problems and solutions.方丝弓矫治器的犬牙后缩——一些问题与解决方法
Br J Orthod. 1982 Oct;9(4):194-202. doi: 10.1179/bjo.9.4.194.
3
A comparison of friction resistance for Nitinol and stainless steel wire in edgewise brackets.
Quintessence Int Dent Dig. 1982 May;13(5):563-71.
陶瓷注射成型(CIM)托槽的摩擦行为
J Orofac Orthop. 2016 Jul;77(4):262-71. doi: 10.1007/s00056-016-0030-8. Epub 2016 May 3.
4
Biomechanical analysis of arch-guided molar distalization when employing superelastic NiTi coil springs.使用超弹性镍钛螺旋弹簧时弓丝引导磨牙远移的生物力学分析
J Orofac Orthop. 1999;60(2):124-35. doi: 10.1007/BF01298962.
4
A comparative study of frictional resistances between orthodontic bracket and arch wire.正畸托槽与弓丝之间摩擦力的比较研究。
Am J Orthod. 1980 Dec;78(6):593-609. doi: 10.1016/0002-9416(80)90199-2.
5
A clinical evaluation of tooth movement along arch wires of two different sizes.对沿两种不同尺寸弓丝的牙齿移动进行的临床评估。
Am J Orthod. 1983 Jun;83(6):453-9.
6
Evaluation of friction forces in the 0.022 x 0.028 edgewise bracket in vitro.体外评估0.022×0.028英寸方丝弓托槽的摩擦力
J Biomech. 1970 Mar;3(2):151-60. doi: 10.1016/0021-9290(70)90002-3.
7
A comparison of time related forces between plastic alastiks and latex elastics.塑料弹力带和乳胶弹力带之间与时间相关的力的比较。
Angle Orthod. 1970 Oct;40(4):319-28. doi: 10.1043/0003-3219(1970)040<0319:ACOTRF>2.0.CO;2.
8
A comparison of frictional forces during simulated canine retraction of a continuous edgewise arch wire.
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 1986 Sep;90(3):199-203. doi: 10.1016/0889-5406(86)90066-1.
9
Ceramic brackets.陶瓷托槽
J Clin Orthod. 1988 Feb;22(2):82-8.
10
Frictional forces between bracket and arch wire.托槽与弓丝之间的摩擦力。
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 1989 Nov;96(5):397-404. doi: 10.1016/0889-5406(89)90324-7.