Department of Public Health and Mortality Studies, International Institute for Population Sciences, Mumbai, India.
PLoS One. 2012;7(5):e37037. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0037037. Epub 2012 May 18.
First, our objective was to estimate socio-economic inequalities in the use of postnatal care (PNC) compared with those in the use of care at birth and antenatal care. Second, we wanted to compare inequalities in the use of PNC between facility births and home births and to determine inequalities in the use of PNC among mothers with high-risk births.
Rich-poor ratios and concentration indices for maternity care were estimated using the third round of the District Level Household Survey conducted in India in 2007-08. Binary logistic regression models were used to examine the socio-economic inequalities associated with use of PNC after adjusting for relevant socio-economic and demographic characteristics. PNC for both mothers and newborns was substantially lower than the care received during pregnancy and child birth. Only 44% of mothers in India at the time of survey received any care within 48 hours after birth. Likewise, only 45% of newborns received check-up within 24 hours of birth. Mothers who had home births were significantly less likely to have received PNC than those who had facility births, with significant differences across the socio-economic strata. Moreover, the rich-poor gap in PNC use was significantly wider for mothers with birth complications.
PNC use has been unacceptably low in India given the risks of mortality for mothers and babies shortly after birth. However, there is evidence to suggest that effective use of pregnancy and childbirth care in health facilities led to better PNC. There are also significant socio-economic inequalities in access to PNC even for those accessing facility-based care. The coverage of essential PNC is inadequate, especially for mothers from economically disadvantaged households. The findings suggest the need for strengthening PNC services to keep pace with advances in coverage for care at birth and prenatal services in India through targeted policy interventions.
首先,我们的目标是估计与出生时护理和产前护理相比,产后护理(PNC)使用方面的社会经济不平等。其次,我们想比较设施分娩和家庭分娩之间 PNC 使用的不平等,并确定高风险分娩母亲 PNC 使用方面的不平等。
使用 2007-08 年印度进行的第三次地区家庭调查的贫富比和孕产妇保健集中指数进行估计。使用二元逻辑回归模型,在调整相关社会经济和人口特征后,检查与 PNC 使用相关的社会经济不平等。母亲和新生儿的 PNC 都明显低于怀孕期间和分娩时的护理。当时只有 44%的印度母亲在分娩后 48 小时内接受任何护理。同样,只有 45%的新生儿在出生后 24 小时内接受检查。在家分娩的母亲接受 PNC 的可能性明显低于在设施分娩的母亲,社会经济阶层之间存在显著差异。此外,分娩并发症母亲的 PNC 使用贫富差距明显更大。
鉴于母亲和婴儿在出生后不久死亡的风险,印度的 PNC 使用情况令人无法接受。然而,有证据表明,在卫生设施中有效利用妊娠和分娩护理可以更好地进行 PNC。即使是那些接受设施护理的人,获得 PNC 的机会也存在显著的社会经济不平等。基本 PNC 的覆盖范围不足,特别是对于经济弱势家庭的母亲。调查结果表明,需要加强 PNC 服务,通过有针对性的政策干预,跟上印度出生时护理和产前服务覆盖范围的进步。