Lobmaier S M, Huhn E A, Pildner von Steinburg S, Müller A, Schuster T, Ortiz J U, Schmidt G, Schneider K T
Frauenklinik und Poliklinik, Technische Universität München, Munich, Germany.
J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med. 2012 Dec;25(12):2523-8. doi: 10.3109/14767058.2012.696163. Epub 2012 Jun 13.
This study aims to compare average acceleration capacity (AAC), a new parameter to assess the dynamic capacity of the fetal autonomous nervous system, and short term variation (STV) in fetuses affected by intrauterine growth restriction (IUGR) and healthy fetuses.
A prospective observational study was performed, including 39 women with IUGR singleton pregnancies (estimated fetal weight <10th percentile and umbilical artery resistance index >95th percentile) and 43 healthy control pregnancies matched according to gestational age at recording. Ultrasound biometries and Doppler examination were performed for identification of IUGR and control fetuses, with subsequent analysis of fetal heart rate, resulting in STV and AAC. Follow-up for IUGR and control pregnancies was done, with perinatal outcome variables recorded.
AAC [IUGR mean value 2.0 bpm (interquartile range = 1.6-2.1), control 2.7 bpm (2.6-3.0)] differentiates better than STV [IUGR 7.4 ms (5.3-8.9), control 10.9 ms (9.2-12.7)] between IUGR and control. The area under the curve for AAC is 97 % [95% CI = (0.95-1.0)], for STV 85 % (CI = 0.76-0.93; p < 0.01). Positive predictive value for STV is 77% and negative predictive value is 81%. For AAC both positive and negative predictive values are 90%.
AAC shows an improvement to discriminate between normal and compromised fetuses at a single moment in time, in comparison with STV.
本研究旨在比较平均加速能力(AAC)和短期变异性(STV),AAC是评估胎儿自主神经系统动态能力的一个新参数,本研究将其用于受宫内生长受限(IUGR)影响的胎儿和健康胎儿。
进行了一项前瞻性观察研究,纳入39例单胎IUGR妊娠妇女(估计胎儿体重<第10百分位数且脐动脉阻力指数>第95百分位数)和43例根据记录时孕周匹配的健康对照妊娠妇女。对IUGR胎儿和对照胎儿进行超声生物测量和多普勒检查,随后分析胎儿心率,得出STV和AAC。对IUGR妊娠和对照妊娠进行随访,记录围产期结局变量。
在区分IUGR胎儿和对照胎儿方面,AAC[IUGR平均值2.0次/分钟(四分位间距=1.6 - 2.1),对照2.7次/分钟(2.6 - 3.0)]比STV[IUGR 7.4毫秒(5.3 - 8.9),对照10.9毫秒(9.2 - 12.7)]表现更好。AAC的曲线下面积为97%[95%置信区间=(0.95 - 1.0)],STV为85%(置信区间=0.76 - 0.93;p<0.01)。STV的阳性预测值为77%,阴性预测值为81%。AAC的阳性和阴性预测值均为90%。
与STV相比,AAC在区分正常胎儿和受损胎儿方面,在单一时间点上有改进。