• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

九个国家 2005-2010 年颈动脉手术临床实践的变化。来自 VASCUNET 的经验教训以及对未来国家临床审计的建议。

Variation in clinical practice in carotid surgery in nine countries 2005-2010. Lessons from VASCUNET and recommendations for the future of national clinical audit.

机构信息

Department of Vascular Surgery, Helsinki University Central Hospital, Helsinki, Finland.

出版信息

Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg. 2012 Jul;44(1):11-7. doi: 10.1016/j.ejvs.2012.04.013. Epub 2012 May 24.

DOI:10.1016/j.ejvs.2012.04.013
PMID:22633072
Abstract

OBJECTIVES

The aim of the study was to analyse variation in carotid surgical practice, results and effectiveness in nine countries.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

A total of 48,185 carotid endarterectomies (CEAs) and 4602 carotid artery stenting (CAS) procedures were included in the comparison. A theoretical effectiveness of CEA provision for each country was estimated.

RESULTS

92.6% of the CEAs were performed according to the inclusion criteria based on the current European recommendations and had a theoretical benefit for the patient. The indication for surgery was symptomatic stenosis in 60.1% and this proportion varied between 31.4% in Italy and 100% in Denmark. The overall combined stroke and death rate in symptomatic patients was 2.3%. This varied between rates of 0.9% in Italy and 3.8% in Norway. The overall combined stroke and death rate in asymptomatic patients was 0.9%. It was lowest in Italy at 0.5%, and highest in Sweden at 2.7%. We estimated that the stroke prevention rate per 1000 CEAs varied from 72.9 in Italy to 130.8 in Denmark.

CONCLUSIONS

There is significant variation in clinical practice across the participating countries. The theoretical stroke prevention potential of CEA seems to vary between participating countries due to differences in the inclusion criteria.

摘要

目的

本研究旨在分析 9 个国家颈动脉手术实践、结果和效果的差异。

患者和方法

共纳入 48185 例颈动脉内膜切除术(CEA)和 4602 例颈动脉支架置入术(CAS)。对每个国家的 CEA 提供情况进行了理论有效性评估。

结果

92.6%的 CEA 符合当前欧洲建议的纳入标准,对患者具有理论获益。手术指征为症状性狭窄占 60.1%,这一比例在意大利为 31.4%,在丹麦为 100%。症状性患者的总体联合卒中死亡率为 2.3%。这一比例在意大利为 0.9%,在挪威为 3.8%。无症状患者的总体联合卒中死亡率为 0.9%。在意大利最低为 0.5%,在瑞典最高为 2.7%。我们估计,每 1000 例 CEA 的卒中预防率在意大利为 72.9,在丹麦为 130.8。

结论

参与国家之间的临床实践存在显著差异。由于纳入标准的差异,CEA 的理论卒中预防潜力似乎在参与国家之间存在差异。

相似文献

1
Variation in clinical practice in carotid surgery in nine countries 2005-2010. Lessons from VASCUNET and recommendations for the future of national clinical audit.九个国家 2005-2010 年颈动脉手术临床实践的变化。来自 VASCUNET 的经验教训以及对未来国家临床审计的建议。
Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg. 2012 Jul;44(1):11-7. doi: 10.1016/j.ejvs.2012.04.013. Epub 2012 May 24.
2
Endarterectomy for preventing stroke in symptomatic and asymptomatic carotid stenosis. Review of clinical trials and recommendations for surgical therapy.症状性和无症状性颈动脉狭窄的内膜切除术预防卒中。临床试验综述及手术治疗建议。
Heart Surg Forum. 1999;2(2):147-68.
3
Outcomes of carotid endarterectomy for asymptomatic stenosis in Sweden are improving: Results from a population-based registry.
J Vasc Surg. 2006 Jul;44(1):79-85. doi: 10.1016/j.jvs.2006.03.003. Epub 2006 May 6.
4
Comparing outcomes of carotid endarterectomy with international benchmarks: audit from an Italian vascular surgery department.
Ital Heart J. 2005 Nov;6(11):917-21.
5
Outcomes of carotid artery stenting in high-risk patients with carotid artery stenosis: a single neurovascular center retrospective review of 101 consecutive patients.颈动脉狭窄高危患者颈动脉支架置入术的结果:单神经血管中心 101 例连续患者的回顾性研究。
Neurosurgery. 2010 Mar;66(3):448-53; discussion 453-4. doi: 10.1227/01.NEU.0000365008.17803.AD.
6
Secondary stroke prevention in the era of carotid stenting: update on recent trials.
Arch Surg. 2010 Oct;145(10):928-35. doi: 10.1001/archsurg.2010.204.
7
Carotid endarterectomy before and after publication of randomized controlled trials.随机对照试验发表前后的颈动脉内膜切除术
Br J Surg. 1999 Feb;86(2):206-10. doi: 10.1046/j.1365-2168.1999.01027.x.
8
Thirty-day outcomes for carotid artery stenting in 6320 patients from 2 prospective, multicenter, high-surgical-risk registries.来自 2 个前瞻性、多中心、高手术风险登记处的 6320 例患者的颈动脉支架置入术 30 天结果。
Circ Cardiovasc Interv. 2009 Jun;2(3):159-66. doi: 10.1161/CIRCINTERVENTIONS.108.823013. Epub 2009 Mar 6.
9
Carotid artery stenting vs. endarterectomy.颈动脉支架置入术与颈动脉内膜切除术的比较。
Eur Heart J. 2009 Nov;30(22):2693-704. doi: 10.1093/eurheartj/ehp471. Epub 2009 Oct 27.
10
Guidelines for the use of carotid endarterectomy: current recommendations from the Canadian Neurosurgical Society.颈动脉内膜切除术使用指南:加拿大神经外科学会的当前建议。
CMAJ. 1997 Sep 15;157(6):653-9.

引用本文的文献

1
A Nationwide Analysis in France on Sex Difference and Outcomes Following Carotid Intervention in Asymptomatic Patients.法国一项关于无症状患者颈动脉介入治疗后性别差异及结果的全国性分析。
J Clin Med. 2024 Oct 9;13(19):6019. doi: 10.3390/jcm13196019.
2
Optimal Management of Asymptomatic Carotid Stenosis: Counterbalancing the Benefits with the Potential Risks.无症状性颈动脉狭窄的优化管理:权衡潜在风险与获益
J Stroke. 2022 Jan;24(1):163-165. doi: 10.5853/jos.2021.04420. Epub 2022 Jan 31.
3
New insight into biology, molecular diagnostics and treatment options of unstable carotid atherosclerotic plaque: a narrative review.
不稳定型颈动脉粥样硬化斑块生物学、分子诊断及治疗选择的新见解:一篇综述
Ann Transl Med. 2021 Jul;9(14):1207. doi: 10.21037/atm-20-7197.
4
Management of Patients with Asymptomatic Carotid Stenosis May Need to Be Individualized: A Multidisciplinary Call for Action.无症状性颈动脉狭窄患者的管理可能需要个体化:多学科行动呼吁。
J Stroke. 2021 May;23(2):202-212. doi: 10.5853/jos.2020.04273. Epub 2021 May 31.
5
Risk of stroke in relation to degree of asymptomatic carotid stenosis: a population-based cohort study, systematic review, and meta-analysis.无症状性颈动脉狭窄程度与卒中风险的关系:基于人群的队列研究、系统评价和荟萃分析。
Lancet Neurol. 2021 Mar;20(3):193-202. doi: 10.1016/S1474-4422(20)30484-1.
6
The conundrum of asymptomatic carotid stenosis-determinants of decision and evidence.无症状性颈动脉狭窄的难题——决策与证据的决定因素
Ann Transl Med. 2020 Oct;8(19):1279. doi: 10.21037/atm-2020-cass-12.
7
Contemporary Trends in Physician Utilization Rates of CEA and CAS for Asymptomatic Carotid Stenosis among Medicare Beneficiaries.当代 Medicare 受益人群无症状性颈动脉狭窄患者行 CEA 和 CAS 治疗的医师使用率趋势。
Ann Vasc Surg. 2021 Feb;71:132-144. doi: 10.1016/j.avsg.2020.08.118. Epub 2020 Sep 3.
8
Carotid Revascularization: Current Practice and Future Directions.颈动脉血运重建:当前实践与未来方向
Semin Intervent Radiol. 2020 Jun;37(2):132-139. doi: 10.1055/s-0040-1709154. Epub 2020 May 14.
9
Carotid artery stenosis screening: where are we now?颈动脉狭窄筛查:我们目前处于什么状况?
Br J Radiol. 2018 Oct;91(1090):20170380. doi: 10.1259/bjr.20170380. Epub 2018 Jun 11.
10
Meta-analysis of the procedural risks of carotid endarterectomy and carotid artery stenting over time.随时间推移对颈动脉内膜切除术和颈动脉支架置入术手术风险的荟萃分析。
Br J Surg. 2018 Jan;105(1):26-36. doi: 10.1002/bjs.10717. Epub 2017 Dec 4.