Findlay J M, Tucker W S, Ferguson G G, Holness R O, Wallace M C, Wong J H
Division of Neurosurgery, Walter Mackenzie Health Science Centre, University of Alberta, Edmonton.
CMAJ. 1997 Sep 15;157(6):653-9.
To develop guidelines on the suitability of patients for carotid endarterectomy (CEA).
For atherosclerotic carotid stenosis that has resulted in retinal or cerebral ischemia: antiplatelet drugs or CEA. For asymptomatic carotid stenosis: CEA or no surgery.
Risk of stroke and death.
Trials comparing CEA with nonsurgical management of carotid stenosis.
Greatest weight was given to findings that were highly significant both statistically and clinically.
BENEFITS, HARMS AND COSTS: Benefit: reduction in the risk of stroke. Major harms: iatrogenic stroke, cardiac complications and death secondary to surgical manipulations of the artery or the systemic stress of surgery. Costs were not considered.
CEA is clearly recommended for patients with surgically accessible internal carotid artery (ICA) stenoses equal to or greater than 70% of the more distal, normal ICA lumen diameter, providing: (1) the stenosis is symptomatic, causing transient ischemic attacks or nondisabling stroke (including retinal infarction); (2) there is no worse distal, ipsilateral, carotid distribution arterial disease; (3) the patient is in stable medical condition; and (4) the rates of major surgical complications (stroke and death) among patients of the treating surgeon are less than 6%. Surgery is not recommended for asymptomatic stenoses of less than 60%. Symptomatic stenoses of less than 70% and asymptomatic stenoses of greater than 60% are uncertain indications. For these indications, consideration should be given to (1) patient presentation, age and medical condition; (2) plaque characteristics such as degree of narrowing, the presence of ulceration and any documented worsening of the plaque over time; (3) other cerebral arterial stenoses or occlusions, or cerebral infarcts identified through neuroimaging; and (4) surgical complication rates at the institution. CEA should not be considered for asymptomatic stenoses unless the combined stroke and death rate among patients of the surgeon is less than 3%.
These guidelines generally agree with position statements prepared by other organizations in recent years, and with a January 1995 consensus statement by a group of experts assembled by the American Heart Association.
制定关于患者是否适合接受颈动脉内膜切除术(CEA)的指南。
对于已导致视网膜或脑缺血的动脉粥样硬化性颈动脉狭窄:抗血小板药物或CEA。对于无症状性颈动脉狭窄:CEA或不进行手术。
中风和死亡风险。
比较CEA与颈动脉狭窄非手术治疗的试验。
对在统计学和临床上均具有高度显著性的研究结果给予最大权重。
益处、危害和成本:益处:降低中风风险。主要危害:医源性中风、心脏并发症以及因动脉手术操作或手术全身应激导致的死亡。未考虑成本。
对于手术可及的颈内动脉(ICA)狭窄等于或大于更远端正常ICA管腔直径的70%的患者,明确推荐CEA,但需满足以下条件:(1)狭窄有症状,导致短暂性脑缺血发作或非致残性中风(包括视网膜梗死);(2)不存在更严重的远端、同侧颈动脉分布区动脉疾病;(3)患者病情稳定;(4)治疗外科医生的患者中主要手术并发症(中风和死亡)发生率低于6%。对于小于60%的无症状性狭窄,不建议手术。小于70%的有症状性狭窄和大于60%的无症状性狭窄属于不确定适应症。对于这些适应症,应考虑:(1)患者表现、年龄和病情;(2)斑块特征,如狭窄程度、溃疡情况以及随时间记录的斑块任何恶化情况;(3)通过神经影像学检查发现的其他脑动脉狭窄或闭塞,或脑梗死;(4)该机构的手术并发症发生率。对于无症状性狭窄,除非外科医生的患者中中风和死亡率合并低于3%,否则不应考虑CEA。
这些指南总体上与其他组织近年来制定的立场声明以及1995年1月美国心脏协会召集的一组专家达成的共识声明一致。