Wake Heart and Vascular Associates, Raleigh, North Carolina 27610, USA.
Catheter Cardiovasc Interv. 2012 Dec 1;80(7):1081-7. doi: 10.1002/ccd.24503. Epub 2012 Aug 20.
Carotid artery stenting (CAS) is an alternative to carotid endarterectomy (CEA) for revascularization of the internal carotid artery (ICA). CAS from the femoral approach may be problematic due to peripheral vascular disease, anatomical variations of the aortic arch, and access site complications. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the right radial approach (RRA) for CAS.
A retrospective analysis of all patients who had undergone transradial (TR) CAS at two centers was performed. Demographics, the technique used to deploy the sheath in the common carotid, procedural details, results, and complications were evaluated.
CAS was attempted from TR in 382 patients (mean age 68, 70% male). CAS was successful in 347/382 (91%) patients; 201/216 (93%) right CA, 14/16 (88%) bovine left CA, 132/150 (88%) left CA. The specific technique varied with the anatomy. Seven different carotid artery stents (51% Xact) and seven different distal embolic protection devices were used. Adverse events included two major strokes (0.6%) one of whom died, three minor strokes (1%), and no myocardial infarction at 30 days. No bleeding complications occurred although 23 (6%) of patients had asymptomatic postprocedure radial occlusion. Inadequate catheter support at the origin of the CCA was the technical cause of failure in the unsuccessful cases which were then completed from femoral access as part of the same procedure.
The transradial approach is an alternative for CAS in the presence of factors that increase the risk or difficulty of femoral access.
颈动脉支架置入术(CAS)是一种替代颈动脉内膜切除术(CEA)的方法,用于重建颈内动脉(ICA)。由于外周血管疾病、主动脉弓解剖变异和入路部位并发症,经股动脉入路进行 CAS 可能存在问题。本研究旨在评估经右侧桡动脉(RRA)入路进行 CAS 的效果。
对在两个中心接受经桡动脉(TR)CAS 的所有患者进行回顾性分析。评估了患者的人口统计学资料、在颈总动脉中放置护套的技术、手术细节、结果和并发症。
382 例患者尝试经 TR 进行 CAS(平均年龄 68 岁,70%为男性)。347/382 例(91%)患者的 CAS 成功;216 例右侧颈动脉(93%)、16 例左侧颈动脉(88%)、150 例左侧颈动脉(88%)。具体技术随解剖结构而异。使用了 7 种不同的颈动脉支架(51%Xact)和 7 种不同的远端栓塞保护装置。不良事件包括 2 例大卒中和 1 例死亡(0.6%)、3 例小卒中和 1 例心肌梗死(30 天)。尽管有 23 例(6%)患者在术后出现无症状桡动脉闭塞,但未发生出血并发症。在不成功的病例中,由于 CCA 起源处导管支持不足,这是技术失败的原因,随后通过股动脉入路完成了这些病例。
在股动脉入路增加风险或难度的情况下,经桡动脉入路是 CAS 的一种替代方法。