• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

PERFORMANCE 1 研究:新型颈动脉支架系统,具有一体化后扩张球囊和栓塞保护装置。

PERFORMANCE 1 study: Novel carotid stent system with integrated post-dilation balloon and embolic protection device.

机构信息

Department for Angiology, Brandenburg Medical School Theodor Fontane, Campus Clinic Brandenburg, Center for Internal Medicine I, Berlin, Germany.

Department of Angiology, Sankt-Gertrauden-Krankenhaus, Berlin, Germany.

出版信息

Catheter Cardiovasc Interv. 2022 Nov;100(6):1090-1099. doi: 10.1002/ccd.30410. Epub 2022 Oct 13.

DOI:10.1002/ccd.30410
PMID:36229946
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC10092178/
Abstract

OBJECTIVES

The PERFORMANCE I study was designed to evaluate the safety and feasibility of the Neuroguard IEP® System, a novel carotid stent system with an integrated embolic filter and post-dilatation balloon, to treat clinically significant carotid artery stenosis.

BACKGROUND

The risk of major adverse events during carotid artery stenting is comparable to carotid endarterectomy, however, the risk of minor stroke remains higher with stenting.

METHODS

In total, 67 patients undergoing carotid artery stenting were enrolled at nine centers in Europe. Follow-up assessments included neurological exams, duplex ultrasound, 12-lead electrocardiogram, and cardiac enzyme analysis. The primary endpoint was the 30-day composite rate of stroke, death, and myocardial infarctions versus a prespecified performance goal. Secondary endpoints included procedure success, device success, and target lesion revascularization.

RESULTS

The study population was predominantly male (74.6%) with a mean age of 69.3 ± 8.9 years and 67% of subjects met at least one criterion placing them at an elevated risk for adverse events following carotid endarterectomy. All patients were treated successfully with the study device. There were no deaths or strokes within 30 days of the index procedure. One subject (1.5%) experienced a non-ST elevation myocardial infarction at day 17. The primary endpoint was met with a 30-day major adverse events rate of 1.5% (1/67). Through 12-month follow-up, there were no strokes, neurological deaths, target lesion revascularizations, or instances of in-stent-restenosis.

CONCLUSIONS

Results from this study demonstrate the Neuroguard IEP system is safe and feasible with a stroke/death rate of 0% at 30 days. A large pivotal study is currently underway.

摘要

目的

PERFORMANCE I 研究旨在评估 Neuroguard IEP® 系统的安全性和可行性,这是一种新型的颈动脉支架系统,具有集成的栓塞过滤器和后扩张球囊,用于治疗有临床意义的颈动脉狭窄。

背景

颈动脉支架置入术的主要不良事件风险与颈动脉内膜切除术相当,但支架置入术的小中风风险仍然较高。

方法

在欧洲的 9 个中心共招募了 67 例接受颈动脉支架置入术的患者。随访评估包括神经检查、双功超声、12 导联心电图和心脏酶分析。主要终点是 30 天内卒中、死亡和心肌梗死的复合发生率与预设的性能目标相比。次要终点包括手术成功率、器械成功率和靶病变血运重建。

结果

研究人群主要为男性(74.6%),平均年龄为 69.3±8.9 岁,67%的患者至少符合一项标准,使他们在颈动脉内膜切除术后发生不良事件的风险升高。所有患者均成功接受研究器械治疗。指数手术后 30 天内无死亡或卒中。1 例(1.5%)患者在第 17 天发生非 ST 段抬高型心肌梗死。主要终点的 30 天主要不良事件发生率为 1.5%(1/67)。在 12 个月的随访中,无卒中、神经源性死亡、靶病变血运重建或支架内再狭窄发生。

结论

这项研究的结果表明,Neuroguard IEP 系统是安全可行的,30 天的卒中/死亡率为 0%。目前正在进行一项大型关键研究。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/66a4/10092178/a3c1d9d4df56/CCD-100-1090-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/66a4/10092178/5af17960857a/CCD-100-1090-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/66a4/10092178/20446a34e176/CCD-100-1090-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/66a4/10092178/a3c1d9d4df56/CCD-100-1090-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/66a4/10092178/5af17960857a/CCD-100-1090-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/66a4/10092178/20446a34e176/CCD-100-1090-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/66a4/10092178/a3c1d9d4df56/CCD-100-1090-g003.jpg

相似文献

1
PERFORMANCE 1 study: Novel carotid stent system with integrated post-dilation balloon and embolic protection device.PERFORMANCE 1 研究:新型颈动脉支架系统,具有一体化后扩张球囊和栓塞保护装置。
Catheter Cardiovasc Interv. 2022 Nov;100(6):1090-1099. doi: 10.1002/ccd.30410. Epub 2022 Oct 13.
2
Double Filtration During Carotid Artery Stenting Using a Novel Post-Dilation Balloon With Integrated Embolic Protection.双重过滤颈动脉支架置入术:一种新型后置扩张球囊联合内置栓塞保护装置
JACC Cardiovasc Interv. 2019 Feb 25;12(4):395-403. doi: 10.1016/j.jcin.2018.11.039.
3
Results of carotid artery stenting with distal embolic protection with improved systems: Protected Carotid Artery Stenting in Patients at High Risk for Carotid Endarterectomy (PROTECT) trial.采用改良系统的颈动脉支架置入术治疗伴有远端栓塞保护装置的结果:高危颈动脉内膜切除术患者颈动脉支架置入术保护(PROTECT)试验。
J Vasc Surg. 2012 Apr;55(4):968-976.e5. doi: 10.1016/j.jvs.2011.10.120. Epub 2012 Jan 9.
4
Safety and feasibility of a novel transcervical access neuroprotection system for carotid artery stenting in the PROOF Study.在 PROOF 研究中,新型经颈入路神经保护系统在颈动脉支架置入术中的安全性和可行性。
J Vasc Surg. 2011 Nov;54(5):1317-23. doi: 10.1016/j.jvs.2011.04.040. Epub 2011 Jun 12.
5
Independent Modular Filter for Embolic Protection in Carotid Stenting.用于颈动脉支架置入术中栓子保护的独立模块化过滤器
Circ Cardiovasc Interv. 2017 Mar;10(3). doi: 10.1161/CIRCINTERVENTIONS.116.004244.
6
Transradial carotid artery stenting using double layer micromesh stent and novel post-dilation balloon with integrated embolic protection.经桡动脉颈动脉支架置入术:双层微网支架和新型带集成栓塞保护的后扩张球囊的应用。
Cardiovasc Revasc Med. 2024 Jun;63:43-51. doi: 10.1016/j.carrev.2024.01.006. Epub 2024 Jan 12.
7
Use of a novel embolic filter in carotid artery stenting: 30-Day results from the EMBOLDEN Clinical Study.新型栓塞滤器在颈动脉支架置入术中的应用:来自 EMBOLDEN 临床研究的 30 天结果。
Catheter Cardiovasc Interv. 2018 Nov 15;92(6):1128-1135. doi: 10.1002/ccd.27474. Epub 2018 Jan 3.
8
Carotid angioplasty and stenting is safe and effective for treatment of recurrent stenosis after eversion endarterectomy.颈动脉血管成形术和支架置入术对于外翻式内膜切除术术后复发性狭窄的治疗是安全有效的。
J Vasc Surg. 2014 Sep;60(3):645-51. doi: 10.1016/j.jvs.2014.03.288. Epub 2014 May 1.
9
A Prospective, Multicenter Study of a Novel Mesh-Covered Carotid Stent: The CGuard CARENET Trial (Carotid Embolic Protection Using MicroNet).一项新型带网孔颈动脉支架的前瞻性多中心研究:CGuardCARENET 试验(使用 MicroNet 进行颈动脉栓子保护)。
JACC Cardiovasc Interv. 2015 Aug 17;8(9):1229-1234. doi: 10.1016/j.jcin.2015.04.016.
10
Radial and ulnar approach for carotid artery stenting with Roadsaver™ double layer micromesh stent: Early and long-term follow-up.使用Roadsaver™双层微网支架经桡动脉和尺动脉途径行颈动脉支架置入术:早期和长期随访
Catheter Cardiovasc Interv. 2023 Jan;101(1):154-163. doi: 10.1002/ccd.30514. Epub 2022 Dec 7.

引用本文的文献

1
The efficacy of different types of cerebral embolic protection device during transcatheter aortic valve implantation: a meta-analysis.经导管主动脉瓣植入术中不同类型脑栓塞保护装置的疗效:一项荟萃分析。
Front Cardiovasc Med. 2024 Feb 23;11:1205943. doi: 10.3389/fcvm.2024.1205943. eCollection 2024.
2
Carotid artery interventions - endarterectomy versus stenting.颈动脉介入治疗——内膜切除术与支架置入术
AsiaIntervention. 2023 Sep 21;9(2):172-179. doi: 10.4244/AIJ-D-23-00009. eCollection 2023 Sep.

本文引用的文献

1
Carotid Artery Stenting in Asymptomatic Carotid Artery Stenosis: JACC Review Topic of the Week.无症状性颈动脉狭窄患者颈动脉支架置入术:美国心脏病学会评论专题之周更
J Am Coll Cardiol. 2020 Feb 18;75(6):648-656. doi: 10.1016/j.jacc.2019.11.054.
2
Transcarotid Artery Revascularization Results in Low Rates of Periprocedural Neurologic Events, Myocardial Infarction, and Death.经颈动脉血管重建术可降低围手术期神经事件、心肌梗死和死亡的发生率。
Curr Cardiol Rep. 2020 Jan 15;22(1):3. doi: 10.1007/s11886-020-1256-z.
3
Acute thromboses and occlusions of dual layer carotid stents in endovascular treatment of tandem occlusions.
急性血栓形成和双层颈动脉支架闭塞在串联闭塞血管内治疗中的应用。
J Neurointerv Surg. 2020 Jan;12(1):33-37. doi: 10.1136/neurintsurg-2019-015032. Epub 2019 Jul 15.
4
Double Filtration During Carotid Artery Stenting Using a Novel Post-Dilation Balloon With Integrated Embolic Protection.双重过滤颈动脉支架置入术:一种新型后置扩张球囊联合内置栓塞保护装置
JACC Cardiovasc Interv. 2019 Feb 25;12(4):395-403. doi: 10.1016/j.jcin.2018.11.039.
5
A multi-institutional analysis of transcarotid artery revascularization compared to carotid endarterectomy.多机构分析经颈动脉血运重建术与颈动脉内膜切除术的比较。
J Vasc Surg. 2019 Jul;70(1):123-129. doi: 10.1016/j.jvs.2018.09.060. Epub 2019 Jan 6.
6
Carotid Artery Stenting Versus Endarterectomy for Stroke Prevention: A Meta-Analysis of Clinical Trials.颈动脉支架置入术与颈动脉内膜切除术预防卒中的Meta 分析:临床试验研究。
J Am Coll Cardiol. 2017 May 9;69(18):2266-2275. doi: 10.1016/j.jacc.2017.02.053.
7
The CLEAR-ROAD study: evaluation of a new dual layer micromesh stent system for the carotid artery.CLEAR-ROAD 研究:一种新型双层微网支架系统在颈动脉中的评估。
EuroIntervention. 2016 Aug 5;12(5):e671-6. doi: 10.4244/EIJY16M05_04.
8
Long-Term Results of Stenting versus Endarterectomy for Carotid-Artery Stenosis.颈动脉狭窄支架置入术与动脉内膜切除术的长期结果
N Engl J Med. 2016 Mar 17;374(11):1021-31. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa1505215. Epub 2016 Feb 18.
9
Randomized Trial of Stent versus Surgery for Asymptomatic Carotid Stenosis.无症状性颈动脉狭窄支架治疗与手术治疗随机试验
N Engl J Med. 2016 Mar 17;374(11):1011-20. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa1515706. Epub 2016 Feb 17.
10
Results of the ROADSTER multicenter trial of transcarotid stenting with dynamic flow reversal.ROADSTER经颈动脉支架置入术联合动态血流逆转多中心试验的结果
J Vasc Surg. 2015 Nov;62(5):1227-34. doi: 10.1016/j.jvs.2015.04.460.