Department of Oral Surgery, Heinrich Heine University, Düsseldorf, Germany.
J Clin Periodontol. 2012 Aug;39(8):789-97. doi: 10.1111/j.1600-051X.2012.01867.x. Epub 2012 May 28.
The study aimed at evaluating the 2-year results obtained following combined surgical resective and regenerative treatment of advanced peri-implantitis defects comparing two methods of surface debridement/decontamination (DD).
MATERIAL & METHODS: Twenty-four patients (n = 26 combined supra- and intrabony defects) completed the 24 months follow-up observation following access flap surgery, granulation tissue removal and implantoplasty at bucally and supracrestally exposed implant parts. The remaining aspects were randomly allocated to surface DD using either (i) an Er:YAG laser (ERL) device, or (ii) plastic curets + cotton pellets + sterile saline (CPS) were augmented with a natural bone mineral and covered with a collagen membrane.
At 24 months, ERL treated sites failed to reveal significantly higher reductions in mean BOP (ERL: 75.0 ± 32.6% versus CPS: 54.9 ± 30.3%) and CAL values (ERL: 1.0 ± 2.2 mm versus CPS: 1.2 ± 2.2 mm) when compared with the CPS group. In both groups, mean CAL values were not significantly different when compared with baseline.
The long-term stability of clinical outcomes obtained following combined surgical therapy of advanced peri-implantitis may be influenced by factors other than the method of surface debridement/decontamination.
本研究旨在评估联合手术切除和再生治疗对中重度种植体周围炎缺损的 2 年疗效,比较两种表面清创/消毒(DD)方法。
24 名患者(n=26 例联合骨上和骨内缺损)完成了 24 个月的随访观察,包括在颊侧和嵴顶暴露的种植体部分进行翻瓣手术、肉芽组织切除和种植体成形术。其余部分随机分为两种方法进行表面 DD:(i)Er:YAG 激光(ERL)设备,或(ii)塑料锉+棉片+无菌生理盐水(CPS),并用天然骨矿物质进行增强,并用胶原膜覆盖。
在 24 个月时,与 CPS 组相比,ERL 治疗组的平均探诊出血(BOP)(ERL:75.0±32.6% 与 CPS:54.9±30.3%)和临床附着丧失(CAL)值(ERL:1.0±2.2mm 与 CPS:1.2±2.2mm)的降低没有显著差异。在两组中,与基线相比,平均 CAL 值均无显著差异。
联合手术治疗中重度种植体周围炎的长期临床疗效的稳定性可能受到表面清创/消毒方法以外的因素影响。