110 Chandlee Laboratory, IGDP Physiology, Pennsylvania State University, University Park, PA 16802, USA.
Appetite. 2012 Oct;59(2):478-82. doi: 10.1016/j.appet.2012.05.022. Epub 2012 May 26.
As interest in the study of binge eating has increased, several measures of bingeing have been developed for use in animal models. Two of the measures that have been used to distinguish binge-type from normal intake in animal studies are: (1) comparing intake at a given point in time between groups, and (2) assessing escalation of intake across time within groups. Here we use both of these measures to reanalyze data from 10 previous bingeing experiments conducted in our lab. Additionally, the data from two of these studies were then restructured in order to evaluate the use of these measures in binge eating prone (BEP) and resistant (BER) rats, as described by others. Analyses comparing intake at a given point in time indicated bingeing in all 10 studies, while comparisons of escalation indicated bingeing in 9 out of 10 studies. The goal of this study was to compare and contrast the two measures, identify the strengths and weaknesses of each, and determine their appropriateness for a given set of potential outcomes. The results indicate that both intake and escalation are useful measures. However, their limitations need to be taken into consideration when attempting to operationalize binge-type eating in animal models.
随着人们对暴食症研究的兴趣日益增加,已经开发出几种用于动物模型的暴食症测量方法。在动物研究中,用于区分暴食型和正常摄入的两种方法是:(1)比较不同组在特定时间点的摄入量,(2)评估组内摄入量随时间的上升情况。在这里,我们使用这两种方法重新分析了我们实验室之前进行的 10 项暴食症实验的数据。此外,对其中两项研究的数据进行了重新构建,以便按照其他人的描述评估这些方法在易暴食(BEP)和抗暴食(BER)大鼠中的应用。比较特定时间点摄入量的分析表明,在所有 10 项研究中都存在暴食行为,而比较摄入量上升的分析表明,在 9 项研究中存在暴食行为。本研究的目的是比较和对比这两种方法,确定每种方法的优缺点,并确定它们在给定的潜在结果集上的适用性。结果表明,摄入量和上升量都是有用的测量方法。然而,在尝试在动物模型中操作暴食型进食时,需要考虑到它们的局限性。