Suppr超能文献

居住安排与晚年抑郁症风险:已发表文献的荟萃分析。

Living arrangements and risk for late life depression: a meta-analysis of published literature.

机构信息

The West China Hospital of Sichuan University, Sichuang Province.

出版信息

Int J Psychiatry Med. 2012;43(1):19-34. doi: 10.2190/PM.43.1.b.

Abstract

OBJECTIVE

The goal of this study was to determine the relationship between living arrangements and risk for depression among older people.

METHOD

MEDLINE, EMBASE, The Cochrane Library database was used to identify potential studies. The studies were divided into cross-sectional and longitudinal subsets. Qualitative meta-analysis of the cross-sectional studies and longitudinal studies was performed, respectively. For prevalence and incidence rates of depression, odds ratio (OR) and relative risk (RR) were calculated, respectively.

RESULTS

The qualitative meta-analysis showed that older people living alone had a higher risk of depression than those not living alone (OR: 1.44; 95% confidence interval [95% CI]: 1.04-1.99); Relative risk (RR: 1.27, 95% CI: 0.89-1.80) and those living with families (OR: 2.59, 95% CI: 1.60-4.20). Older people living in a nursing home (OR: 2.90, 95% CI: 0.94-8.94; RR: 1.94, 95% CI: 1.18-3.20) or institutionalized setting (OR: 1.86, 95% CI: 1.37-2.52; RR: 2.03, 95% CI: 1.12-3.70) had a higher risk of depression than those living in home.

CONCLUSIONS

Despite the methodological limitations of this meta-analysis, living arrangements appear related to the risk for depression in the older population. Older persons living alone, in a nursing home, or in an institutionalized setting have higher risk for depression.

摘要

目的

本研究旨在确定老年人居住安排与抑郁风险之间的关系。

方法

使用 MEDLINE、EMBASE 和 Cochrane 图书馆数据库来确定潜在的研究。这些研究分为横断面和纵向亚组。对横断面研究和纵向研究分别进行定性荟萃分析。对于抑郁的患病率和发病率,计算了优势比(OR)和相对风险(RR)。

结果

定性荟萃分析表明,独居的老年人比不独居的老年人(OR:1.44;95%置信区间[95%CI]:1.04-1.99);相对风险(RR:1.27,95%CI:0.89-1.80)和与家人同住的老年人(OR:2.59,95%CI:1.60-4.20)。居住在养老院(OR:2.90,95%CI:0.94-8.94;RR:1.94,95%CI:1.18-3.20)或机构化环境中的老年人(OR:1.86,95%CI:1.37-2.52;RR:2.03,95%CI:1.12-3.70)比居住在家庭中的老年人(OR:1.44;95%CI:1.04-1.99);相对风险(RR:1.27,95%CI:0.89-1.80)和与家人同住的老年人(OR:2.59,95%CI:1.60-4.20)。居住在养老院(OR:2.90,95%CI:0.94-8.94;RR:1.94,95%CI:1.18-3.20)或机构化环境中的老年人(OR:1.86,95%CI:1.37-2.52;RR:2.03,95%CI:1.12-3.70)比居住在家庭中的老年人(OR:1.44;95%CI:1.04-1.99);相对风险(RR:1.27,95%CI:0.89-1.80)和与家人同住的老年人(OR:2.59,95%CI:1.60-4.20)。风险更高。

结论

尽管这项荟萃分析存在方法学上的局限性,但居住安排似乎与老年人的抑郁风险有关。独居、住在养老院或机构化环境中的老年人患抑郁症的风险更高。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验