Suppr超能文献

测量 MDT 工作质量:一种观察方法。

Measuring the quality of MDT working: an observational approach.

机构信息

Florence Nightingale School of Nursing & Midwifery, King's College London, England.

出版信息

BMC Cancer. 2012 May 29;12:202. doi: 10.1186/1471-2407-12-202.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Cancer multidisciplinary teams (MDTs) are established in many countries but little is known about how well they function. A core activity is regular MDT meetings (MDMs) where treatment recommendations are agreed. A mixed methods descriptive study was conducted to develop and test quality criteria for observational assessment of MDM performance calibrated against consensus from over 2000 MDT members about the "characteristics of an effective MDT".

METHODS

Eighteen of the 86 'Characteristics of Effective MDTs' were considered relevant and feasible to observe. They collated to 15 aspects of MDT working covering four domains: the team (e.g. attendance, chairing, teamworking); infrastructure for meetings (venue, equipment); meeting organisation and logistics; and patient-centred clinical decision-making (patient-centredness, clarity of recommendations). Criteria for rating each characteristic from 'very poor' to 'very good' were derived from literature review, observing MDMs and expert input. Criteria were applied to 10 bowel cancer MDTs to assess acceptability and measure variation between and within teams. Feasibility and inter-rater reliability was assessed by comparing three observers.

RESULTS

Observational assessment was acceptable to teams and feasible to implement. Total scores from 29 to 50 (out of 58) highlighted wide diversity in quality between teams. Eight teams were rated either 'very good/good' or 'very poor/poor' for at least three domains demonstrating some internal consistency. 'Very good' ratings were most likely for attendance and administrative preparation, and least likely for patient-centredness of decision-making and prioritisation of complex cases. All except two characteristics had intra-class correlations of ≥0.50.

CONCLUSIONS

This observational tool (MDT-OARS) may contribute to the assessment of MDT performance. Further testing to confirm validity and reliability is required.

摘要

背景

癌症多学科团队(MDTs)在许多国家都已建立,但对于其运作情况却知之甚少。MDTs 的一项核心活动是定期召开 MDT 会议(MDMs),以达成治疗建议。本研究采用混合方法描述性研究,旨在制定和测试观察性评估 MDM 性能的质量标准,并根据 2000 多名 MDT 成员对“有效 MDT 特征”的共识进行校准。

方法

在 86 个“有效 MDT 特征”中,有 18 个被认为是相关且可行的观察对象。它们可归纳为 MDT 工作的 15 个方面,涵盖四个领域:团队(如出席情况、主持情况、团队合作);会议基础设施(场地、设备);会议组织和后勤;以患者为中心的临床决策制定(以患者为中心、建议的明确性)。从文献回顾、观察 MDM 和专家意见中得出了用于评估每个特征的从“非常差”到“非常好”的评分标准。这些标准被应用于 10 个结直肠癌 MDT 中,以评估其可接受性,并衡量团队之间和团队内部的差异。通过比较三名观察者来评估可行性和组间一致性。

结果

团队对观察性评估表示接受,且实施具有可行性。总分在 29 到 50 之间(满分 58 分),突出了团队之间在质量上的广泛差异。有 8 个团队在至少三个领域被评为“非常好/好”或“非常差/差”,这表明了一定的内部一致性。“非常好”的评分最有可能出现在出席情况和行政准备方面,而在决策的以患者为中心和复杂病例的优先排序方面则最不可能。除了两个特征外,所有特征的组内相关系数均≥0.50。

结论

这种观察性工具(MDT-OARS)可能有助于评估 MDT 的绩效。需要进一步测试以确认其有效性和可靠性。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/7446/3489862/be0a6eadfdc3/1471-2407-12-202-1.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验