• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

多学科癌症团队的护理管理决策质量:系统评价。

Quality of care management decisions by multidisciplinary cancer teams: a systematic review.

机构信息

Department of Surgery and Cancer, Imperial College London, London, UK.

出版信息

Ann Surg Oncol. 2011 Aug;18(8):2116-25. doi: 10.1245/s10434-011-1675-6. Epub 2011 Mar 26.

DOI:10.1245/s10434-011-1675-6
PMID:21442345
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Factors that affect the quality of clinical decisions of multidisciplinary cancer teams (MDTs) are not well understood. We reviewed and synthesised the evidence on clinical, social and technological factors that affect the quality of MDT clinical decision-making.

METHODS

Electronic databases were searched in May 2009. Eligible studies reported original data, quantitative or qualitative. Data were extracted and tabulated by two blinded reviewers, and study quality formally evaluated.

RESULTS

Thirty-seven studies were included. Study quality was low to medium. Studies assessed quality of care decisions via the effect of MDTs on care management. MDTs changed cancer management by individual physicians in 2-52% of cases. Failure to reach a decision at MDT discussion was found in 27-52% of cases. Decisions could not be implemented in 1-16% of cases. Team decisions are made by physicians, using clinical information. Nursing personnel do not have an active role, and patient preferences are not discussed. Time pressure, excessive caseload, low attendance, poor teamworking and lack of leadership lead to lack of information and deterioration of decision-making. Telemedicine is increasingly used in developed countries, with no detriment to quality of MDT decisions.

CONCLUSIONS

Team/social factors affect management decisions by cancer MDTs. Inclusion of time to prepare for MDTs into team-members' job plans, making team and leadership skills training available to team-members, and systematic input from nursing personnel would address some of the current shortcomings. These improvements ought to be considered at national policy level, with the ultimate aim of improving cancer care.

摘要

背景

影响多学科癌症团队(MDT)临床决策质量的因素尚不清楚。我们回顾和综合了影响 MDT 临床决策质量的临床、社会和技术因素的证据。

方法

2009 年 5 月对电子数据库进行了搜索。合格的研究报告了原始数据,定量或定性。由两名盲审员提取和制表数据,并对研究质量进行正式评估。

结果

共纳入 37 项研究。研究质量为低至中等。研究通过 MDT 对护理管理的影响来评估护理决策的质量。MDT 在 2-52%的情况下改变了个别医生的癌症治疗。在 27-52%的情况下,MDT 讨论未能做出决定。在 1-16%的情况下,无法实施决定。团队决策由医生根据临床信息做出。护理人员没有积极的作用,也不讨论患者的偏好。时间压力、工作量过大、出勤率低、团队合作不佳以及缺乏领导力导致信息不足和决策恶化。远程医疗在发达国家越来越多地使用,但不会对 MDT 决策的质量造成损害。

结论

团队/社会因素影响癌症 MDT 的管理决策。将准备 MDT 的时间纳入团队成员的工作计划中,为团队成员提供团队和领导技能培训,并由护理人员系统地参与,可以解决当前的一些不足之处。这些改进应该在国家政策层面上进行考虑,最终目的是改善癌症护理。

相似文献

1
Quality of care management decisions by multidisciplinary cancer teams: a systematic review.多学科癌症团队的护理管理决策质量:系统评价。
Ann Surg Oncol. 2011 Aug;18(8):2116-25. doi: 10.1245/s10434-011-1675-6. Epub 2011 Mar 26.
2
Health professionals' experience of teamwork education in acute hospital settings: a systematic review of qualitative literature.医疗专业人员在急症医院环境中团队合作教育的经验:对定性文献的系统综述
JBI Database System Rev Implement Rep. 2016 Apr;14(4):96-137. doi: 10.11124/JBISRIR-2016-1843.
3
Home treatment for mental health problems: a systematic review.心理健康问题的居家治疗:一项系统综述
Health Technol Assess. 2001;5(15):1-139. doi: 10.3310/hta5150.
4
Interventions for promoting habitual exercise in people living with and beyond cancer.促进癌症患者及康复者进行习惯性锻炼的干预措施。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2018 Sep 19;9(9):CD010192. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD010192.pub3.
5
Cost-effectiveness of using prognostic information to select women with breast cancer for adjuvant systemic therapy.利用预后信息为乳腺癌患者选择辅助性全身治疗的成本效益
Health Technol Assess. 2006 Sep;10(34):iii-iv, ix-xi, 1-204. doi: 10.3310/hta10340.
6
A rapid and systematic review of the clinical effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of paclitaxel, docetaxel, gemcitabine and vinorelbine in non-small-cell lung cancer.对紫杉醇、多西他赛、吉西他滨和长春瑞滨在非小细胞肺癌中的临床疗效和成本效益进行的快速系统评价。
Health Technol Assess. 2001;5(32):1-195. doi: 10.3310/hta5320.
7
Perceptions and experiences of the prevention, detection, and management of postpartum haemorrhage: a qualitative evidence synthesis.预防、检测和管理产后出血的认知和经验:定性证据综合。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2023 Nov 27;11(11):CD013795. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD013795.pub2.
8
Eliciting adverse effects data from participants in clinical trials.从临床试验参与者中获取不良反应数据。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2018 Jan 16;1(1):MR000039. doi: 10.1002/14651858.MR000039.pub2.
9
The clinical effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of enzyme replacement therapy for Gaucher's disease: a systematic review.戈谢病酶替代疗法的临床疗效和成本效益:一项系统评价。
Health Technol Assess. 2006 Jul;10(24):iii-iv, ix-136. doi: 10.3310/hta10240.
10
Educational interventions for the management of cancer-related fatigue in adults.针对成人癌症相关疲劳管理的教育干预措施。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2016 Nov 24;11(11):CD008144. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD008144.pub2.

引用本文的文献

1
The initiation of the second-step intradisciplinary tumor board discussion and its impact on treatment decision. Retrospective data analysis of 12 years' experience in a tertiary oncology center.第二步学科内肿瘤专家会诊讨论的启动及其对治疗决策的影响。对某三级肿瘤中心12年经验的回顾性数据分析。
Front Oncol. 2025 Aug 12;15:1553874. doi: 10.3389/fonc.2025.1553874. eCollection 2025.
2
Adding noise can reduce response biases in addition to improving perceptual performance.添加噪声除了能提高感知性能外,还能减少反应偏差。
iScience. 2025 Jul 29;28(8):113227. doi: 10.1016/j.isci.2025.113227. eCollection 2025 Aug 15.
3
Role of neoadjuvant therapies in locally advanced colon cancer.
新辅助治疗在局部晚期结肠癌中的作用。
Chin Med J (Engl). 2025 Sep 5;138(17):2091-2101. doi: 10.1097/CM9.0000000000003756. Epub 2025 Jul 30.
4
Economic Burden and Provider Referral Patterns Among Patients with Unresectable Stage III EGFR-Mutated NSCLC Receiving Chemoradiotherapy in the United States.美国不可切除的 III 期表皮生长因子受体(EGFR)突变型非小细胞肺癌(NSCLC)患者接受放化疗的经济负担及医疗服务提供者转诊模式
Adv Ther. 2025 May 29. doi: 10.1007/s12325-025-03239-y.
5
Multidisciplinary Team Care in Plastic Surgery: Vascular Anomalies.整形手术中的多学科团队护理:血管异常
Semin Plast Surg. 2025 May 21;39(2):82-88. doi: 10.1055/s-0045-1808272. eCollection 2025 May.
6
Process Re-Engineering and Data Integration Using Fast Healthcare Interoperability Resources for the Multidisciplinary Treatment of Lung Cancer.利用快速医疗互操作性资源进行肺癌多学科治疗的流程再造与数据整合
JMIR Cancer. 2025 May 5;11:e53887. doi: 10.2196/53887.
7
Exploring Hospital Healthcare Providers' Approaches to Multidisciplinary Initiatives and Complex Care Collaboration: A Qualitative Study.探索医院医疗服务提供者开展多学科举措及复杂护理协作的方法:一项定性研究。
J Multidiscip Healthc. 2025 Apr 30;18:2401-2416. doi: 10.2147/JMDH.S513370. eCollection 2025.
8
Designing Effective Multidisciplinary Team Meetings in the Greek National Health System: Opinions, Obstacles, and Implementation.希腊国家卫生系统中有效多学科团队会议的设计:意见、障碍与实施
Cureus. 2025 Mar 13;17(3):e80550. doi: 10.7759/cureus.80550. eCollection 2025 Mar.
9
Clinical Utility of Integrated Multidisciplinary Patient-Centered Information in Breast Cancer Care: A Mixed Methods Study.乳腺癌护理中综合多学科以患者为中心的信息的临床效用:一项混合方法研究。
J Multidiscip Healthc. 2025 Apr 5;18:1875-1893. doi: 10.2147/JMDH.S506292. eCollection 2025.
10
Reforming Cancer Multidisciplinary Team Meetings: Introducing a Novel Clinical Radiological Assessment Meeting (CRAM) to Reduce Response Times and Workloads.改革癌症多学科团队会议:引入新型临床放射学评估会议(CRAM)以缩短响应时间并减轻工作量。
Cureus. 2025 Feb 17;17(2):e79140. doi: 10.7759/cureus.79140. eCollection 2025 Feb.