• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

报告肿瘤标志物预后研究建议(REMARK):解释和说明。

Reporting recommendations for tumor marker prognostic studies (REMARK): explanation and elaboration.

机构信息

Centre for Statistics in Medicine, University of Oxford, UK.

出版信息

BMC Med. 2012 May 29;10:51. doi: 10.1186/1741-7015-10-51.

DOI:10.1186/1741-7015-10-51
PMID:22642691
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC3362748/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

The Reporting Recommendations for Tumor Marker Prognostic Studies (REMARK) checklist consists of 20 items to report for published tumor marker prognostic studies. It was developed to address widespread deficiencies in the reporting of such studies. In this paper we expand on the REMARK checklist to enhance its use and effectiveness through better understanding of the intent of each item and why the information is important to report.

METHODS

REMARK recommends including a transparent and full description of research goals and hypotheses, subject selection, specimen and assay considerations, marker measurement methods, statistical design and analysis, and study results. Each checklist item is explained and accompanied by published examples of good reporting, and relevant empirical evidence of the quality of reporting. We give prominence to discussion of the 'REMARK profile', a suggested tabular format for summarizing key study details.

SUMMARY

The paper provides a comprehensive overview to educate on good reporting and provide a valuable reference for the many issues to consider when designing, conducting, and analyzing tumor marker studies and prognostic studies in medicine in general. To encourage dissemination of the Reporting Recommendations for Tumor Marker Prognostic Studies (REMARK): Explanation and Elaboration, this article has also been published in PLoS Medicine.

摘要

背景

《肿瘤标志物预后研究报告推荐规范》(REMARK)清单包含 20 项条目,用于报告已发表的肿瘤标志物预后研究。它的制定是为了解决此类研究报告中普遍存在的缺陷。在本文中,我们通过更好地理解每个条目的意图以及报告这些信息的重要性,对 REMARK 清单进行了扩展,以增强其使用和有效性。

方法

REMARK 建议包括对研究目标和假设、受试者选择、标本和检测考虑因素、标志物测量方法、统计设计和分析以及研究结果进行透明和全面的描述。每个清单条目都进行了解释,并附有已发表的良好报告示例,以及有关报告质量的相关实证证据。我们重点讨论了“REMARK 概要”,这是一种用于总结关键研究细节的建议表格格式。

总结

本文提供了全面的概述,旨在教育人们进行良好的报告,并为设计、进行和分析肿瘤标志物研究以及一般医学中的预后研究提供有价值的参考。为了鼓励《肿瘤标志物预后研究报告推荐规范》(REMARK)的传播:解释和阐述,本文也发表在 PLoS Medicine 上。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/2a85/3362748/f69181cf913f/1741-7015-10-51-3.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/2a85/3362748/36d15282eccc/1741-7015-10-51-1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/2a85/3362748/7e522f6cf17e/1741-7015-10-51-2.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/2a85/3362748/f69181cf913f/1741-7015-10-51-3.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/2a85/3362748/36d15282eccc/1741-7015-10-51-1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/2a85/3362748/7e522f6cf17e/1741-7015-10-51-2.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/2a85/3362748/f69181cf913f/1741-7015-10-51-3.jpg

相似文献

1
Reporting recommendations for tumor marker prognostic studies (REMARK): explanation and elaboration.报告肿瘤标志物预后研究建议(REMARK):解释和说明。
BMC Med. 2012 May 29;10:51. doi: 10.1186/1741-7015-10-51.
2
Reporting Recommendations for Tumor Marker Prognostic Studies (REMARK): explanation and elaboration.报告肿瘤标志物预后研究推荐(REMARK):解释和说明。
PLoS Med. 2012;9(5):e1001216. doi: 10.1371/journal.pmed.1001216. Epub 2012 May 29.
3
Reporting Recommendations for Tumor Marker Prognostic Studies (REMARK): An Abridged Explanation and Elaboration.报告肿瘤标志物预后研究推荐(REMARK):摘要解释和详细说明。
J Natl Cancer Inst. 2018 Aug 1;110(8):803-811. doi: 10.1093/jnci/djy088.
4
Reporting of prognostic studies of tumour markers: a review of published articles in relation to REMARK guidelines.肿瘤标志物预后研究报告:对相关 REMARK 指南的已发表文章的回顾。
Br J Cancer. 2010 Jan 5;102(1):173-80. doi: 10.1038/sj.bjc.6605462. Epub 2009 Dec 8.
5
REporting recommendations for tumour MARKer prognostic studies (REMARK).肿瘤标志物预后研究报告建议(REMARK)
Br J Cancer. 2005 Aug 22;93(4):387-91. doi: 10.1038/sj.bjc.6602678.
6
Structured reporting to improve transparency of analyses in prognostic marker studies.结构报告提高预后标志物研究分析透明度。
BMC Med. 2022 May 12;20(1):184. doi: 10.1186/s12916-022-02304-5.
7
REporting recommendations for tumour MARKer prognostic studies (REMARK).肿瘤标志物预后研究报告建议(REMARK)
Eur J Cancer. 2005 Aug;41(12):1690-6. doi: 10.1016/j.ejca.2005.03.032.
8
Reporting in studies of protein biomarkers of prognosis in colorectal cancer in relation to the REMARK guidelines.报告结直肠癌预后相关蛋白生物标志物的研究结果,符合 REMARK 指南。
Proteomics Clin Appl. 2015 Dec;9(11-12):1078-86. doi: 10.1002/prca.201400177. Epub 2015 May 7.
9
Did the reporting of prognostic studies of tumour markers improve since the introduction of REMARK guideline? A comparison of reporting in published articles.自引入REMARK指南以来,肿瘤标志物预后研究的报告情况是否有所改善?对已发表文章报告情况的比较。
PLoS One. 2017 Jun 14;12(6):e0178531. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0178531. eCollection 2017.
10
REporting recommendations for tumor MARKer prognostic studies (REMARK).肿瘤标志物预后研究报告建议(REMARK)。
Nat Clin Pract Urol. 2005 Aug;2(8):416-22.

引用本文的文献

1
Prognostic Value of the Immunohistochemical Detection of Cellular Components of the Tumor Microenvironment in Oral Squamous Cell Carcinoma: A Systematic Review.口腔鳞状细胞癌肿瘤微环境细胞成分免疫组化检测的预后价值:一项系统评价
Curr Issues Mol Biol. 2025 Jul 12;47(7):544. doi: 10.3390/cimb47070544.
2
Evaluation of changes in prediction modelling in biomedicine using systematic reviews.使用系统评价评估生物医学中预测模型的变化
BMC Med Res Methodol. 2025 Jul 1;25(1):167. doi: 10.1186/s12874-025-02605-2.
3
Machine Learning and Experimental Validation Reveal MYH11 as a Novel Prognostic Biomarker and Therapeutic Target in Bladder Cancer.

本文引用的文献

1
Biospecimen Reporting for Improved Study Quality.生物样本报告以提高研究质量。
Biopreserv Biobank. 2011 Apr;9(1):57-70. doi: 10.1089/bio.2010.0036.
2
Down regulation of E-Cadherin (ECAD) - a predictor for occult metastatic disease in sentinel node biopsy of early squamous cell carcinomas of the oral cavity and oropharynx.E-Cadherin(ECAD)下调——口腔和口咽早期鳞癌前哨淋巴结活检隐匿性转移疾病的预测因子。
BMC Cancer. 2011 Jun 3;11:217:1-8. doi: 10.1186/1471-2407-11-217.
3
Biomarker studies: a call for a comprehensive biomarker study registry.
机器学习与实验验证揭示MYH11是膀胱癌新的预后生物标志物和治疗靶点。
J Inflamm Res. 2025 Jun 25;18:8357-8387. doi: 10.2147/JIR.S519719. eCollection 2025.
4
Systematic Search and Modified e-Delphi Consensus for Serum Bone Biomarkers in Humans and Animal Models with SCI: Methodology.脊髓损伤的人类和动物模型中血清骨生物标志物的系统检索与改良电子德尔菲共识法:方法学
Top Spinal Cord Inj Rehabil. 2025 Spring;31(2):13-28. doi: 10.46292/sci24-00042. Epub 2025 Jun 19.
5
Commentary: Regression Models-Efforts Are Required to Improve Statistical Practice and Teaching.评论:回归模型——需要努力改进统计实践与教学。
Stat Med. 2025 Jun;44(13-14):e10341. doi: 10.1002/sim.10341.
6
Predictive value of [F]FDG PET-derived parameters for microsatellite instability and prognosis in patients with colorectal cancer.[F]FDG PET衍生参数对结直肠癌患者微卫星不稳定性及预后的预测价值
Eur Radiol. 2025 Jun 12. doi: 10.1007/s00330-025-11732-9.
7
Identification of vitronectin as a potential non-invasive biomarker of metastatic breast cancer using a label-free LC-MS/MS approach.使用无标记液相色谱-串联质谱法鉴定玻连蛋白作为转移性乳腺癌潜在的非侵入性生物标志物。
Breast Cancer Res. 2025 May 29;27(1):94. doi: 10.1186/s13058-025-02053-2.
8
Tools used to appraise the quality of studies included in systematic reviews and meta-analyses in human genetics: a systematic review.用于评估纳入人类遗传学系统评价和荟萃分析的研究质量的工具:一项系统评价
Eur J Hum Genet. 2025 May 21. doi: 10.1038/s41431-025-01861-6.
9
Tumor-Stroma Ratio in Head and Neck Squamous Cell Carcinoma: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.头颈部鳞状细胞癌中的肿瘤-基质比:一项系统评价和荟萃分析
Oral Dis. 2025 Mar 24. doi: 10.1111/odi.15319.
10
Linking LEDGF/p75 Overexpression With Microsatellite Instability and KRAS Mutations: A Small-Scale Study in Colorectal Cancer.将LEDGF/p75过表达与微卫星不稳定性及KRAS突变相联系:一项关于结直肠癌的小规模研究
Cancer Control. 2025 Jan-Dec;32:10732748251313499. doi: 10.1177/10732748251313499.
生物标志物研究:呼吁建立全面的生物标志物研究注册库。
Nat Rev Clin Oncol. 2011 Mar;8(3):171-6. doi: 10.1038/nrclinonc.2011.4.
4
New prognostic markers for outcome of acute pancreatitis: overview of reporting in 184 studies.急性胰腺炎预后的新预后标志物:184 项研究中的报告概述。
Pancreas. 2011 May;40(4):522-32. doi: 10.1097/MPA.0b013e31820bf8ac.
5
Evaluating the quality of research into a single prognostic biomarker: a systematic review and meta-analysis of 83 studies of C-reactive protein in stable coronary artery disease.评估单个预后生物标志物的研究质量:83 项稳定型冠状动脉疾病 C 反应蛋白研究的系统评价和荟萃分析。
PLoS Med. 2010 Jun 1;7(6):e1000286. doi: 10.1371/journal.pmed.1000286.
6
CONSORT 2010 explanation and elaboration: updated guidelines for reporting parallel group randomised trials.CONSORT 2010解释与详述:平行组随机试验报告的更新指南
BMJ. 2010 Mar 23;340:c869. doi: 10.1136/bmj.c869.
7
CONSORT 2010 statement: updated guidelines for reporting parallel group randomised trials.CONSORT 2010 声明:平行组随机试验报告的更新指南。
BMJ. 2010 Mar 23;340:c332. doi: 10.1136/bmj.c332.
8
Increased shedding of HU177 correlates with worse prognosis in primary melanoma.HU177 的脱落增加与原发性黑色素瘤的预后更差相关。
J Transl Med. 2010 Feb 23;8:19. doi: 10.1186/1479-5876-8-19.
9
Randomized clinical trials with biomarkers: design issues.随机临床试验与生物标志物:设计问题。
J Natl Cancer Inst. 2010 Feb 3;102(3):152-60. doi: 10.1093/jnci/djp477. Epub 2010 Jan 14.
10
Competing risks and time-dependent covariates.竞争风险与时间依存性协变量。
Biom J. 2010 Feb;52(1):138-58. doi: 10.1002/bimj.200900076.