• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

经鼻纤维喉镜检查中利多卡因与左旋布比卡因的比较。

Comparison of lidocaine and levobupivacaine in transnasal fiberoptic laryngoscopy.

机构信息

Department of Otorhinolaryngology, Izzet Baysal Medicine Faculty of Abant Izzet Baysal University, Bolu, Turkey.

出版信息

Am J Rhinol Allergy. 2012 May-Jun;26(3):e104-6. doi: 10.2500/ajra.2012.26.3757.

DOI:10.2500/ajra.2012.26.3757
PMID:22643937
Abstract

BACKGROUND

The anatomy of the nasal passages, pharynx, and larynx and evaluation of mucous membranes and laryngeal function is well observed by transnasal fiberoptic laryngoscopy (TFL). In this procedure, to provide good local infiltrative analgesia, medication such as anesthetics is important for the otolaryngologist. The aim of this study was to evaluate the efficacy of lidocaine (L) spray, compared with levobupivacaine solution, used for local anesthetic in patients undergoing TFL for complete examination.

METHODS

Sixty-two subjects (39 men and 23 women; mean age, 36 ± 7 years) were enrolled in the study. Patients were randomly classified into two groups as levobupivacaine hydroclorur (LB) and L groups. A standard flexible transnasal fiberoptic 4.2-mm-diameter laryngoscope was passed through the nasal cavity and into the aerodigestive tract. Patients were asked to evaluate the intensity of the pain they experienced during the TFL, using a visual analog scale (VAS) and Ramsay sedation scale.

RESULTS

Demographic data were similar in both groups. There was no difference in VAS and Ramsay scores between both groups (p > 0.05).

CONCLUSION

Our findings indicated that topical levobupivacaine seems to be an effective medication for anesthesia of the nasal mucosa and may be used to allow complete examinations involving TFL.

摘要

背景

经鼻纤维喉镜(TFL)可很好地观察鼻腔、咽和喉的解剖结构,并评估黏膜和喉功能。在该过程中,耳鼻喉科医生需要使用局部浸润麻醉药物(如麻醉剂)来提供良好的局部浸润镇痛。本研究旨在评估利多卡因(L)喷雾与左旋布比卡因溶液在 TFL 全面检查中用作局部麻醉药物的效果。

方法

共纳入 62 名患者(39 名男性和 23 名女性;平均年龄 36 ± 7 岁),将患者随机分为两组:左布比卡因盐酸盐(LB)组和 L 组。通过鼻腔插入标准的软性经鼻纤维喉镜,进入呼吸道和消化道。患者使用视觉模拟评分(VAS)和 Ramsay 镇静评分评估在 TFL 过程中经历的疼痛强度。

结果

两组的人口统计学数据相似。两组的 VAS 和 Ramsay 评分无差异(p>0.05)。

结论

我们的研究结果表明,局部应用左布比卡因似乎是一种有效的鼻黏膜麻醉药物,可用于允许进行 TFL 全面检查。

相似文献

1
Comparison of lidocaine and levobupivacaine in transnasal fiberoptic laryngoscopy.经鼻纤维喉镜检查中利多卡因与左旋布比卡因的比较。
Am J Rhinol Allergy. 2012 May-Jun;26(3):e104-6. doi: 10.2500/ajra.2012.26.3757.
2
Comparison of topical anesthetic effects of lidocaine, prilocaine, ropivacaine, and bupivacaine in transnasal fiberoptic nasopharyngolaryngoscopy.利多卡因、丙胺卡因、罗哌卡因和布比卡因在经鼻纤维鼻咽喉镜检查中局部麻醉效果的比较。
Am J Rhinol Allergy. 2014 May-Jun;28(3):e141-3. doi: 10.2500/ajra.2014.28.4028.
3
Comparison of tolerance and cost-effectiveness of two nasal anesthesia techniques for transnasal flexible laryngoscopy.两种经鼻行软性喉镜检查鼻腔麻醉技术的耐受性和成本效益比较。
Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2014 Apr;150(4):582-6. doi: 10.1177/0194599813519952. Epub 2014 Feb 4.
4
Lidocaine spray vs tetracaine solution for transnasal fiber-optic laryngoscopy.利多卡因喷雾与丁卡因溶液用于经鼻纤维喉镜检查。
Am J Otolaryngol. 2010 Mar-Apr;31(2):114-6. doi: 10.1016/j.amjoto.2008.11.011. Epub 2009 Mar 27.
5
Levobupivacaine 0.75% vs. lidocaine 4% for topical anaesthesia: a clinical comparison in cataract surgery.0.75%左旋布比卡因与4%利多卡因用于局部麻醉:白内障手术的临床比较
Eur J Anaesthesiol. 2007 May;24(5):438-40. doi: 10.1017/S0265021506002018. Epub 2007 Jan 4.
6
Vasoconstriction and analgesic efficacy of locally infiltrated levobupivacaine for nasal surgery.左旋布比卡因局部浸润用于鼻手术的血管收缩和镇痛效果
Anesth Analg. 2008 Mar;106(3):1008-11, table of contents. doi: 10.1213/ane.0b013e31816174c3.
7
A double-blind randomised controlled trial assessing the efficacy of topical lidocaine in extended flexible endoscopic nasal examinations.一项评估局部利多卡因在延长性可弯曲鼻内镜检查中疗效的双盲随机对照试验。
Clin Otolaryngol. 2011 Dec;36(6):550-7. doi: 10.1111/j.1749-4486.2011.02403.x.
8
Comparison of levo-bupivacaine and lidocaine for postoperative analgesia following septoplasty.左旋布比卡因与利多卡因用于鼻中隔成形术后镇痛的比较。
Rhinology. 2008 Dec;46(4):289-91.
9
A randomized, controlled study comparing a lidocaine patch, a placebo patch, and anesthetic injection for treatment of trigger points in patients with myofascial pain syndrome: evaluation of pain and somatic pain thresholds.一项随机对照研究,比较利多卡因贴片、安慰剂贴片和麻醉注射治疗肌筋膜疼痛综合征患者触发点的效果:疼痛和躯体痛阈值评估
Clin Ther. 2009 Apr;31(4):705-20. doi: 10.1016/j.clinthera.2009.04.006.
10
Low-dose 3 mg levobupivacaine plus 10 microg fentanyl selective spinal anesthesia for gynecological outpatient laparoscopy.低剂量3毫克左旋布比卡因加10微克芬太尼用于妇科门诊腹腔镜手术的选择性脊麻。
Anesth Analg. 2009 Nov;109(5):1456-61. doi: 10.1213/ANE.0b013e3181ba792e.

引用本文的文献

1
Effect of prilocaine and its combination with tramadol on anxiety and pain during nasal packing removal.普鲁卡因及其与曲马多联合应用对鼻腔填塞物取出时焦虑和疼痛的影响。
Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol. 2020 May;277(5):1385-1390. doi: 10.1007/s00405-020-05863-6. Epub 2020 Feb 24.
2
Topical anesthetic preparations for rigid and flexible endoscopy: a meta-analysis.用于硬性和软性内镜检查的局部麻醉制剂:一项荟萃分析。
Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol. 2015 Feb;272(2):263-70. doi: 10.1007/s00405-014-3012-8. Epub 2014 Mar 29.