MRC Biostatistics Unit, Institute of Public Health, University Forvie Site, Robinson Way, Cambridge, UK.
Eur J Epidemiol. 2012 Jul;27(7):547-59. doi: 10.1007/s10654-012-9693-7. Epub 2012 May 29.
The alcohol-breast cancer association has been established using alcohol intake measurements from Food Frequency Questionnaires (FFQ). For some nutrients diet diary measurements are more highly correlated with true intake compared with FFQ measurements, but it is unknown whether this is true for alcohol. A case-control study (656 breast cancer cases, 1905 matched controls) was sampled from four cohorts in the UK Dietary Cohort Consortium. Alcohol intake was measured prospectively using FFQs and 4- or 7-day diet diaries. Both relied on fixed portion sizes allocated to given beverage types, but those used to obtain FFQ measurements were lower. FFQ measurements were therefore on average lower and to enable fair comparison the FFQ was "calibrated" using diet diary portion sizes. Diet diaries gave more zero measurements, demonstrating the challenge of distinguishing never-from episodic-consumers using short term instruments. To use all information, two combined measurements were calculated. The first is an average of the two measurements with special treatment of zeros. The second is the expected true intake given both measurements, calculated using a measurement error model. After confounder adjustment the odds ratio (OR) per 10 g/day of alcohol intake was 1.05 (95 % CI 0.98, 1.13) using diet diaries, and 1.13 (1.02, 1.24) using FFQs. The calibrated FFQ measurement and combined measurements 1 and 2 gave ORs 1.10 (1.03, 1.18), 1.09 (1.01, 1.18), 1.09 (0.99,1.20), respectively. The association was modified by HRT use, being stronger among users versus non-users. In summary, using an alcohol measurement from a diet diary at one time point gave attenuated associations compared with FFQ.
酒精与乳腺癌的关联已通过食物频率问卷(FFQ)中的酒精摄入量测量来确定。对于某些营养素,饮食日记测量与真实摄入量的相关性比 FFQ 测量更高,但对于酒精是否如此则不得而知。一项病例对照研究(656 例乳腺癌病例,1905 例匹配对照)从英国饮食队列联盟的四个队列中抽取。使用 FFQ 和 4 或 7 天饮食日记前瞻性测量酒精摄入量。两者都依赖于分配给特定饮料类型的固定份量,但用于获取 FFQ 测量的份量较低。因此,FFQ 测量值平均较低,为了进行公平比较,使用饮食日记份量对 FFQ 进行了“校准”。饮食日记记录了更多的零测量值,这表明使用短期工具区分从不饮酒者和偶尔饮酒者具有挑战性。为了使用所有信息,计算了两种合并测量值。第一种是两种测量值的平均值,并对零值进行了特殊处理。第二种是根据测量误差模型,根据两种测量值计算出的预期真实摄入量。经过混杂因素调整后,每天摄入 10 克酒精的比值比(OR)分别为饮食日记(1.05,95%置信区间 0.98,1.13)和 FFQ(1.13,1.02,1.24)。经过校准的 FFQ 测量值和合并测量值 1 和 2 的 OR 分别为 1.10(1.03,1.18)、1.09(1.01,1.18)和 1.09(0.99,1.20)。该关联受到 HRT 使用的修饰,在使用者中比非使用者中更强。总之,在一个时间点使用饮食日记中的酒精测量值与 FFQ 相比,关联较弱。