• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利：CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法，用中文像聊天一样搜索，搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐，让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版，准确专业，支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式，支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述，25分钟生成高质量综述，智能提取关键信息，辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

Caution should be used in applying propensity scores estimated in a full cohort to adjust for confounding in subgroup analyses: commentary on "Applying propensity scores estimated in a full cohort to adjust for confounding in subgroup analyses": Commentary on "Applying propensity scores estimated in a full cohort to adjust for confounding in subgroup analyses".

作者信息

Marcus Sue M, Gibbons Robert D

机构信息

New York State Psychiatric Institute, Columbia University, New York, NY, USA.

出版信息

Pharmacoepidemiol Drug Saf. 2012 Jul;21(7):710-712. doi: 10.1002/pds.3202. Epub 2012 May 30.

DOI:10.1002/pds.3202
PMID:22645065
Abstract
摘要

相似文献

1
Caution should be used in applying propensity scores estimated in a full cohort to adjust for confounding in subgroup analyses: commentary on "Applying propensity scores estimated in a full cohort to adjust for confounding in subgroup analyses": Commentary on "Applying propensity scores estimated in a full cohort to adjust for confounding in subgroup analyses".在将全队列中估计的倾向得分用于亚组分析中的混杂因素调整时应谨慎：对《应用全队列中估计的倾向得分进行亚组分析中的混杂因素调整》的评论：对《应用全队列中估计的倾向得分进行亚组分析中的混杂因素调整》的评论
Pharmacoepidemiol Drug Saf. 2012 Jul;21(7):710-712. doi: 10.1002/pds.3202. Epub 2012 May 30.
2
On the estimation and use of propensity scores in case-control and case-cohort studies.关于病例对照研究和病例队列研究中倾向得分的估计与应用。
Am J Epidemiol. 2007 Aug 1;166(3):332-9. doi: 10.1093/aje/kwm069. Epub 2007 May 15.
3
Performance of disease risk scores, propensity scores, and traditional multivariable outcome regression in the presence of multiple confounders.存在多种混杂因素时，疾病风险评分、倾向评分和传统多变量结局回归的表现。
Am J Epidemiol. 2011 Sep 1;174(5):613-20. doi: 10.1093/aje/kwr143. Epub 2011 Jul 12.
4
Applying propensity scores estimated in a full cohort to adjust for confounding in subgroup analyses.应用在全队列中估计的倾向得分来调整亚组分析中的混杂因素。
Pharmacoepidemiol Drug Saf. 2012 Jul;21(7):697-709. doi: 10.1002/pds.2256. Epub 2011 Dec 8.
5
An overview of the objectives of and the approaches to propensity score analyses.倾向评分分析的目标和方法概述。
Eur Heart J. 2011 Jul;32(14):1704-8. doi: 10.1093/eurheartj/ehr031. Epub 2011 Feb 28.
6
Effects of long-term exposure to traffic-related air pollution on respiratory and cardiovascular mortality in the Netherlands: the NLCS-AIR study.长期暴露于交通相关空气污染对荷兰呼吸道和心血管疾病死亡率的影响：荷兰长期队列空气污染研究（NLCS-AIR研究）
Res Rep Health Eff Inst. 2009 Mar(139):5-71; discussion 73-89.
7
Weaknesses of goodness-of-fit tests for evaluating propensity score models: the case of the omitted confounder.评估倾向得分模型的拟合优度检验的弱点：遗漏混杂因素的情况。
Pharmacoepidemiol Drug Saf. 2005 Apr;14(4):227-38. doi: 10.1002/pds.986.
8
Supplementary data collection with case-cohort analysis to address potential confounding in a cohort study of thromboembolism in oral contraceptive initiators matched on claims-based propensity scores.采用病例队列分析进行补充数据收集，以解决在基于索赔倾向评分匹配的口服避孕药使用者血栓栓塞队列研究中潜在的混杂问题。
Pharmacoepidemiol Drug Saf. 2008 Mar;17(3):297-305. doi: 10.1002/pds.1554.
9
Propensity score adjustment for pretreatment differences between hospitalized and ambulatory patients with community-acquired pneumonia. Pneumonia Patient Outcomes Research Team (PORT) Investigators.对社区获得性肺炎住院患者和门诊患者治疗前差异进行倾向评分调整。肺炎患者预后研究团队（PORT）研究者。
Med Care. 1995 Apr;33(4 Suppl):AS56-66.
10
Methods to adjust for bias and confounding in critical care health services research involving observational data.在涉及观察性数据的重症监护健康服务研究中调整偏倚和混杂因素的方法。
J Crit Care. 2006 Mar;21(1):1-7. doi: 10.1016/j.jcrc.2006.01.004.

引用本文的文献

1
A Review of Causal Inference for External Comparator Arm Studies.外部对照臂研究的因果推断综述。
Drug Saf. 2022 Aug;45(8):815-837. doi: 10.1007/s40264-022-01206-y. Epub 2022 Jul 27.
2
Bias due to sample selection in propensity score matching for a supportive housing program evaluation in New York City.纽约市支持性住房项目评估中倾向得分匹配样本选择导致的偏差。
PLoS One. 2014 Oct 13;9(10):e109112. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0109112. eCollection 2014.
3
Examining moderation analyses in propensity score methods: application to depression and substance use.
倾向得分法中的调节分析检验：在抑郁症和物质使用中的应用
J Consult Clin Psychol. 2014 Oct;82(5):773-83. doi: 10.1037/a0036515. Epub 2014 Apr 14.