Baldwin S E, Baranoski M V
University of New Mexico College of Nursing, Albuquerque 87131.
Adolescence. 1990 Fall;25(99):573-82.
Despite the tremendous growth of family systems theory in recent years, sex education within a family systems context has received little attention. This study examined patterns of interaction within the family and the possible relationship of these patterns to the amount of sex education occurring in the home. Ninety-six adolescents (ages 13-14, 43% male, 90% Caucasian) and the parents of 63 of them (61 mothers and 45 fathers) completed three questionnaires: (1) FACES-II, a measure which categorizes family interactions as Balanced, Midrange or Extreme based on the two dimensions of cohesiveness and adaptability; (2) the Parent-Adolescent Communication Scale; and (3) the Home Discussion Questionnaire, a measure of the amount of discussion about 17 sex education topics. Adolescents who reported open communication and satisfaction with family interactions reported significantly more sex education in the home. Although mothers' reports of sex education were not related to their perceptions of family communication or interactions, fathers who reported the healthiest family interactions also reported the most involvement in the sex education of their adolescent.
尽管近年来家庭系统理论有了巨大发展,但在家庭系统背景下的性教育却很少受到关注。本研究考察了家庭内部的互动模式,以及这些模式与家庭中性教育量之间可能存在的关系。96名青少年(年龄在13 - 14岁之间,43%为男性,90%为白人)以及其中63人的父母(61名母亲和45名父亲)完成了三份问卷:(1)FACES - II,一种基于凝聚力和适应性两个维度将家庭互动分类为平衡型、中等型或极端型的测量工具;(2)亲子沟通量表;(3)家庭讨论问卷,一种测量关于17个性教育主题讨论量的工具。报告沟通开放且对家庭互动满意的青少年,其家庭中的性教育显著更多。尽管母亲对性教育的报告与她们对家庭沟通或互动的认知无关,但报告家庭互动最健康的父亲,也报告了在其青少年子女的性教育中参与度最高。