Suppr超能文献

假设的气动废物收集系统与上门收集系统的环境可持续性比较。

Environmental sustainability comparison of a hypothetical pneumatic waste collection system and a door-to-door system.

机构信息

VTT Technical Research Centre of Finland, Biologinkuja 7, P.O. Box 1000, FI-02044 VTT, Finland.

出版信息

Waste Manag. 2012 Oct;32(10):1775-81. doi: 10.1016/j.wasman.2012.05.003. Epub 2012 May 28.

Abstract

Waste collection is one of the life cycle phases that influence the environmental sustainability of waste management. Pneumatic waste collection systems represent a new way of arranging waste collection in densely populated urban areas. However, limited information is available on the environmental impacts of this system. In this study, we compare the environmental sustainability of conventional door-to-door waste collection with its hypothetical pneumatic alternative. Furthermore, we analyse whether the size of the hypothetical pneumatic system, or the number of waste fractions included, have an impact on the results. Environmental loads are calculated for a hypothetical pneumatic waste collection system modelled on an existing dense urban area in Helsinki, Finland, and the results are compared to those of the prevailing, container-based, door-to-door waste collection system. The evaluation method used is the life-cycle inventory (LCI). In this study, we report the atmospheric emissions of greenhouse gases (GHG), SO(2) and NO(x). The results indicate that replacing the prevailing system with stationary pneumatic waste collection in an existing urban infrastructure would increase total air emissions. Locally, in the waste collection area, emissions would nonetheless diminish, as collection traffic decreases. While the electricity consumption of the hypothetical pneumatic system and the origin of electricity have a significant bearing on the results, emissions due to manufacturing the system's components prove decisive.

摘要

垃圾收集是影响废物管理环境可持续性的生命周期阶段之一。气动废物收集系统代表了在人口密集的城市地区安排废物收集的一种新方法。然而,关于该系统的环境影响的信息有限。在本研究中,我们将传统的上门收集废物与假设的气动替代方案进行了环境可持续性比较。此外,我们还分析了假设的气动系统的规模或所包含的废物分数数量是否对结果有影响。为芬兰赫尔辛基的一个现有密集城市的气动废物收集系统建立了模型,并计算了环境负荷,将结果与现行的基于容器的上门收集废物系统进行了比较。使用的评估方法是生命周期清单(LCI)。在本研究中,我们报告了温室气体(GHG)、SO2和 NOx的大气排放。结果表明,在现有城市基础设施中,用固定式气动废物收集替代现行系统将增加总空气排放量。然而,由于收集交通减少,在废物收集区,排放量仍会减少。虽然假设的气动系统的电力消耗和电力来源对结果有重大影响,但系统组件制造的排放证明是决定性的。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验