National Center for Posttraumatic Stress Disorder, VA Connecticut Healthcare System, West Haven, Connecticut 06516, USA.
Int Psychogeriatr. 2012 Oct;24(10):1684-96. doi: 10.1017/S1041610212000853. Epub 2012 May 30.
Little research has examined the diagnostic utility and factor structure of commonly used posttraumatic stress disorder (PTSD) assessment instruments in older persons.
A total of 206 adults aged 60 or older (mean age = 69 years; range = 60-92), who resided in the Galveston Bay area when Hurricane Ike struck in September 2008, completed a computer-assisted telephone interview two-five months after this disaster. Using the PTSD Checklist (PCL), PTSD symptoms were assessed related both to this disaster and to participants' worst lifetime traumatic event. Total PCL scores were compared to PCL-based, Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders, 4th edition (DSM-IV)-derived probable diagnoses of PTSD to determine optimal cut scores. Confirmatory factor analyses (CFAs) were conducted to evaluate PTSD symptom structure.
Receiver operating characteristic analyses indicated that a PCL score of 39 achieved optimal sensitivity and specificity in assessing a PCL-based, algorithm-derived DSM-IV diagnosis of worst event-related PTSD; and that a score of 37 optimally assessed probable Ike-related PTSD. CFAs revealed that a recently proposed five-factor model - comprised of re-experiencing, avoidance, numbing, dysphoric arousal, and anxious arousal factors - provided a better fitting representation of both worst event- and disaster-related PTSD symptoms than alternative models. Current Ike-related anxious arousal symptoms demonstrated a significantly stronger association with current generalized anxiety than depressive symptoms, thereby supporting the construct validity of this five-factor model of PTSD symptomatology.
A PCL score of 37 to 39 may help identify probable PTSD in older persons. The expression of PTSD symptoms in older adults may be best characterized by a recently proposed five-factor model with distinct dysphoric arousal and anxious arousal clusters.
针对老年人中常用的创伤后应激障碍(PTSD)评估工具的诊断效用和因素结构,研究甚少。
共有 206 名年龄在 60 岁或以上(平均年龄=69 岁;范围 60-92 岁)的成年人,他们在 2008 年 9 月飓风艾克袭击时居住在加尔维斯顿湾地区,在这场灾难后两到五个月完成了一次计算机辅助电话访谈。使用 PTSD 检查表(PCL),评估了与这场灾难以及参与者一生中最严重的创伤性事件相关的 PTSD 症状。将总 PCL 评分与基于 PCL 的、精神障碍诊断与统计手册第 4 版(DSM-IV)衍生的 PTSD 可能诊断进行比较,以确定最佳截断分数。进行验证性因素分析(CFAs)以评估 PTSD 症状结构。
接受者操作特征分析表明,PCL 得分为 39 时,在评估基于 PCL 的、算法衍生的 DSM-IV 最严重事件相关 PTSD 诊断时具有最佳的敏感性和特异性;而得分 37 时可最佳评估与 Ike 相关的 PTSD。CFAs 显示,最近提出的五因素模型 - 由再体验、回避、麻木、烦躁觉醒和焦虑觉醒因素组成 - 比替代模型更好地代表了最严重事件和灾难相关的 PTSD 症状。目前与 Ike 相关的焦虑觉醒症状与当前广泛性焦虑的关联明显强于抑郁症状,从而支持了 PTSD 症状学这一五因素模型的结构效度。
PCL 得分为 37 到 39 可能有助于识别老年人中可能的 PTSD。老年人 PTSD 症状的表现可能最好用最近提出的五因素模型来描述,该模型具有独特的烦躁觉醒和焦虑觉醒簇。