Germundsson Per, Gustafsson Johanna, Lind Martin, Danermark Berth
The Swedish Institute for Disability Research, School of Health and Medical Sciences, Örebro University, Sweden.
Int J Rehabil Res. 2012 Sep;35(3):263-9. doi: 10.1097/MRR.0b013e3283544d3c.
In this article, we examine supported employment and its impact on the level of employment, disposable income, and sum of allowances, targeting a group of individuals with disabilities. We have particularly focused on individuals with psychiatric disabilities. Supported employment is a vocational rehabilitation service with an empowerment approach that has competitive employment as an expressed goal. Data collected from two Swedish organizations, providing services based on supported employment, have been used. Two groups have been considered: one group focusing on individuals who have received vocational rehabilitation, according to the supported employment approach, and the other group focusing on individuals who declined supported employment (control group). The groups have been examined according to a 'before-and-after the intervention' design. Outcome measures have been retrospectively analyzed. The results indicate that the individuals who received supported employment were hired faster, earned a higher disposable income, and at the same time, had lower individual allowances. The same pattern as that for the overall population emerged for individuals with psychiatric disorders. Vocational rehabilitation based on the principles of supported employment may be very effective for individuals to gain employment, a better disposable income, and a substantial cutback in allowances. The intervention should be tailored according to individual needs rather than organizational rules.
在本文中,我们针对一群残疾人研究了支持性就业及其对就业水平、可支配收入和津贴总额的影响。我们特别关注患有精神疾病的残疾人。支持性就业是一种职业康复服务,采用赋权方法,以竞争性就业为明确目标。我们使用了从瑞典两个基于支持性就业提供服务的组织收集的数据。我们考虑了两组:一组关注按照支持性就业方法接受职业康复的个人,另一组关注拒绝支持性就业的个人(对照组)。根据“干预前后”设计对两组进行了研究。对结果指标进行了回顾性分析。结果表明,接受支持性就业的个人被更快地聘用,获得了更高的可支配收入,同时个人津贴较低。患有精神疾病的个人出现了与总体人群相同的模式。基于支持性就业原则的职业康复对于个人获得就业、更好的可支配收入以及大幅削减津贴可能非常有效。干预应根据个人需求而非组织规则进行调整。