Cooper J K, Johnson T P
Department of Medicine, University of California, Davis Medical Centre, Sacramento 95817, USA.
Br J Ind Med. 1990 Jan;47(1):52-7. doi: 10.1136/oem.47.1.52.
Miners disabled from black lung disease (coal workers' pneumoconiosis, CWP) are entitled to disability benefits under United States federal and state laws. The determination of disability currently involves several scientific controversies. The Federal Department of Labor states that one second forced vital capacity (FEV1) is an important marker of disability from CWP. The Department of Labor also states that disability may occur in simple CWP, in the absence of progressive massive fibrosis (PMF). Both these contentions may reasonably be challenged. To investigate these issues, and to investigate the relation between exercise tolerance and several other variables, including age, weight, radiographic findings, and exposure to mining and smoking, we studied 690 miners. Simple correlation analysis was not helpful because many variables were correlated with each other. Linear regression analysis led to conclusions that were thought to be misleading. Causal modelling provided an analysis that appeared to be most explanatory. In the model tested years of coal mining did not affect FEV1; if this conclusion is substantiated by others FEV1 should be eliminated as an indicator of disability from CWP as it is not related to mining experience. On the other hand, the Department of Labor's position that disability may occur in simple CWP seems reasonable, as years of underground coal mining does affect forced vital capacity (FVC), which in turn impairs exercise capacity, even in the absence of PMF. FVC should be the major spirometric value used in determining disability from CWP because it alone is seen to decrease in relation to mining, and a decrease in FVC does affect exercise capacity. Thus this analysis addresses issues in determining black lung disability and shows the value of casual modelling.
因患黑肺病(煤工尘肺,CWP)而丧失劳动能力的矿工有权根据美国联邦和州法律领取伤残津贴。目前,伤残评定存在若干科学争议。联邦劳工部指出,一秒用力肺活量(FEV1)是煤工尘肺导致伤残的一项重要指标。劳工部还指出,即使没有进行性大块纤维化(PMF),单纯性煤工尘肺也可能导致伤残。这两种观点都可能受到合理质疑。为了研究这些问题,以及研究运动耐力与其他几个变量之间的关系,这些变量包括年龄、体重、影像学检查结果以及采矿和吸烟暴露情况,我们对690名矿工进行了研究。简单相关分析并无帮助,因为许多变量之间相互关联。线性回归分析得出的结论被认为具有误导性。因果模型分析似乎最具解释力。在所测试的模型中,采煤年限并未影响FEV1;如果其他人证实这一结论,那么FEV1作为煤工尘肺伤残指标就应被剔除,因为它与采矿经历无关。另一方面,劳工部关于单纯性煤工尘肺可能导致伤残的观点似乎合理,因为地下采煤年限确实会影响用力肺活量(FVC),进而损害运动能力,即使没有PMF也是如此。FVC应是用于判定煤工尘肺伤残的主要肺功能测定值,因为只有它会因采矿而下降,且FVC下降确实会影响运动能力。因此,该分析解决了黑肺病伤残评定中的问题,并展示了因果模型分析的价值。