Huba G J, Bentler P M
J Pers Soc Psychol. 1982 Sep;43(3):604-11.
This paper considers the arguments raised by Martin (1982) against the methodologies used by Huba, Wingard, and Bentler (1981) and their subsequent conclusions. Several of Martin's criticisms are the result of a misreading of our paper and selective citations, whereas other criticisms were discussed in the original paper and resolved through alternate forms of data analysis. Further analyses are presented to address issues raised by Martin. Martin's arguments against latent variable models are refuted.
本文探讨了马丁(1982年)针对胡巴、温加德和本特勒(1981年)所使用的方法及其后续结论提出的论点。马丁的一些批评是由于对我们论文的误读和选择性引用造成的,而其他批评在原文中已进行了讨论,并通过其他形式的数据分析得到了解决。本文还进行了进一步的分析,以回应马丁提出的问题。马丁反对潜在变量模型的论点被驳斥。