Department of Chemistry, Indian Institute of Technology Bombay, Powai, Mumbai 400076, India.
Dalton Trans. 2012 Jul 21;41(27):8430-40. doi: 10.1039/c2dt12325h. Epub 2012 May 30.
The mechanism of M(II)-PNP-pincer catalyzed reaction between (i) ethene, (ii) trans-butene with 2-methylbut-2-ene, 2,3-dimethylbut-2-ene and tert-butylbutene is examined by using density functional theory methods (where M = Pt or Pd). All key intermediates and transition states involved in the reaction are precisely located on the respective potential energy surfaces using the popular DFT functionals such as mPW1K, M06-2X, and B3LYP in conjunction with the 6-31+G** basis set. The reaction between these olefins can lead to a linear coupling product or a substituted cyclopropane. The energetic comparison between coupling as well as cyclopropanation pathways involving four pairs of olefins for both platinum (1-4) and palladium (5-8) catalyzed reactions is performed. The key events in the lower energy pathway in the mechanistic course involves (i) a C-C bond formation between the metal bound olefin (ethene or trans-butene) and a free olefin, and (ii) two successive [1,2] hydrogen migrations in the ensuing carbocationic intermediates (1c-4c, and 1d-4d), toward the formation of the coupling product. The computed barriers for these steps in the reaction of metal bound ethene to free tert-butylbutene (or other butenes) are found to be much lower than the corresponding steps when trans-butene is bound to the metal pincer. The Gibbs free energy differences between the transition states leading to the coupling product (TS(d-e)) and that responsible for cyclopropanated product (TS(d-g)) are found to be diminishingly closer in the case of the platinum pincer as compared to that in the palladium system. The computed energetics indicate that the coupled product prefers to remain as a metal olefin complex, consistent with the earlier experimental reports.
使用密度泛函理论方法(其中 M = Pt 或 Pd)研究了(i)乙烯、(ii)反式丁烯与 2-甲基-2-丁烯、2,3-二甲基-2-丁烯和叔丁基丁烯之间的 M(II)-PNP-钳形催化剂反应的机理。使用流行的 DFT 泛函(如 mPW1K、M06-2X 和 B3LYP)以及 6-31+G** 基组,在各自的势能面上精确定位了反应中涉及的所有关键中间体和过渡态。这些烯烃之间的反应可以导致线性偶联产物或取代的环丙烷。对涉及四个对烯烃的铂(1-4)和钯(5-8)催化反应的偶联以及环丙烷化途径的能量进行了比较。在机制过程中,较低能量途径中的关键事件涉及(i)金属结合的烯烃(乙烯或反式丁烯)与游离烯烃之间的 C-C 键形成,以及(ii)在随后的碳阳离子中间体(1c-4c 和 1d-4d)中连续进行的两次[1,2]氢迁移,朝向偶联产物的形成。计算得到的金属结合乙烯与游离叔丁基丁烯(或其他丁烯)反应中这些步骤的势垒远低于反式丁烯与金属钳形物结合时的相应步骤。与钯体系相比,导致偶联产物的过渡态(TS(d-e))和负责环丙烷化产物的过渡态(TS(d-g))之间的吉布斯自由能差逐渐减小。计算出的能量学表明,偶联产物倾向于保持为金属烯烃配合物,与早期的实验报告一致。