• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利：CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法，用中文像聊天一样搜索，搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐，让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版，准确专业，支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式，支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述，25分钟生成高质量综述，智能提取关键信息，辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

相似文献

1
Methods guide for authors of systematic reviews of medical tests: a collaboration between the Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality (AHRQ) and the Journal of General Internal Medicine.医学检验系统评价作者方法指南：医疗保健研究与质量局（AHRQ）与《普通内科医学杂志》合作编写
J Gen Intern Med. 2012 Jun;27 Suppl 1(Suppl 1):S1-3. doi: 10.1007/s11606-012-2053-1.
2
The Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality (AHRQ) effective health care (EHC) program methods guide for comparative effectiveness reviews: keeping up-to-date in a rapidly evolving field.医疗保健研究与质量局（AHRQ）比较效果评价的有效医疗保健（EHC）计划方法指南：在快速发展的领域中与时俱进。
J Clin Epidemiol. 2011 Nov;64(11):1166-7. doi: 10.1016/j.jclinepi.2011.08.004.
3
The future of Cochrane Neonatal.考克兰新生儿协作网的未来。
Early Hum Dev. 2020 Nov;150:105191. doi: 10.1016/j.earlhumdev.2020.105191. Epub 2020 Sep 12.
4
Chapter 1: Introduction to the Methods Guide for Medical Test Reviews.第 1 章：医学检验审查方法指南简介。
J Gen Intern Med. 2012 Jun;27 Suppl 1(Suppl 1):S4-10. doi: 10.1007/s11606-011-1798-2.
5
Editorial: Methods Guide for Authors of Systematic Reviews of Medical Tests: A Collaboration Between the Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality (AHRQ) and the Journal of General Internal Medicine社论：医学检验系统评价作者方法指南：医疗保健研究与质量局（AHRQ）与《普通内科杂志》的合作
6
AHRQ series on complex intervention systematic reviews-paper 1: an introduction to a series of articles that provide guidance and tools for reviews of complex interventions.医疗保健研究与质量局关于复杂干预系统评价的系列文章——论文1：一系列为复杂干预评价提供指导和工具的文章介绍
J Clin Epidemiol. 2017 Oct;90:6-10. doi: 10.1016/j.jclinepi.2017.06.011. Epub 2017 Jul 15.
7
Chapter 6: assessing applicability of medical test studies in systematic reviews.第六章：系统评价中评估医学检测研究的适用性。
J Gen Intern Med. 2012 Jun;27 Suppl 1(Suppl 1):S39-46. doi: 10.1007/s11606-011-1961-9.
8
Chapter 5: assessing risk of bias as a domain of quality in medical test studies.第五章：评估医学检测研究中偏倚风险作为质量领域。
J Gen Intern Med. 2012 Jun;27 Suppl 1(Suppl 1):S33-8. doi: 10.1007/s11606-012-2030-8.
9
Chapter 2: medical tests guidance (2) developing the topic and structuring systematic reviews of medical tests: utility of PICOTS, analytic frameworks, decision trees, and other frameworks.第 2 章：医学检验指南（2）：主题开发与医学检验系统评价的构建：PICOTS 的实用性、分析框架、决策树和其他框架。
J Gen Intern Med. 2012 Jun;27 Suppl 1(Suppl 1):S11-9. doi: 10.1007/s11606-012-2007-7.
10
AHRQ series paper 1: comparing medical interventions: AHRQ and the effective health-care program.AHRQ 系列论文 1：比较医疗干预措施：AHRQ 与有效医疗保健计划。
J Clin Epidemiol. 2010 May;63(5):481-3. doi: 10.1016/j.jclinepi.2008.06.009. Epub 2008 Oct 1.

引用本文的文献

1
Dose-response relationship of serum ferritin and dietary iron intake with metabolic syndrome and non-alcoholic fatty liver disease incidence: a systematic review and meta-analysis.血清铁蛋白和膳食铁摄入量与代谢综合征及非酒精性脂肪性肝病发病率的剂量反应关系：一项系统评价和荟萃分析
Front Nutr. 2024 Oct 1;11:1437681. doi: 10.3389/fnut.2024.1437681. eCollection 2024.
2
Risk factors for venous thromboembolism following knee arthroscopy: A systematic review and meta-analysis of observational studies.膝关节镜检查后静脉血栓栓塞的危险因素：观察性研究的系统评价和荟萃分析
Heliyon. 2024 Feb 10;10(4):e25939. doi: 10.1016/j.heliyon.2024.e25939. eCollection 2024 Feb 29.
3
Dose-response relationship between daily screen time and the risk of low back pain among children and adolescents: a meta-analysis of 57831 participants.每日屏幕时间与儿童和青少年腰痛风险之间的剂量-反应关系：57831 名参与者的荟萃分析。
Environ Health Prev Med. 2023;28:64. doi: 10.1265/ehpm.23-00177.
4
Comparison of infliximab with adalimumab for the treatment of non-infectious uveitis: a systematic review and meta-analysis.比较英夫利昔单抗与阿达木单抗治疗非感染性葡萄膜炎：系统评价和荟萃分析。
BMC Ophthalmol. 2023 May 29;23(1):240. doi: 10.1186/s12886-023-02987-1.
5
Brain network analysis for the discrimination of dementia disorders using electrophysiology signals: A systematic review.基于电生理信号的痴呆症鉴别脑网络分析：一项系统综述
Front Aging Neurosci. 2023 Mar 3;15:1039496. doi: 10.3389/fnagi.2023.1039496. eCollection 2023.
6
Impact of sarcopenia on the future liver remnant growth after portal vein embolization and associating liver partition and portal vein ligation for staged hepatectomy in patients with liver cancer: A systematic review.肌肉减少症对肝癌患者门静脉栓塞及联合肝脏分隔和门静脉结扎分期肝切除术后未来肝剩余体积增长的影响：一项系统评价
Front Oncol. 2022 Nov 24;12:1064785. doi: 10.3389/fonc.2022.1064785. eCollection 2022.
7
The prevalence of psychological stress in student populations during the COVID-19 epidemic: a systematic review and meta-analysis.COVID-19 疫情期间学生群体中心理压力的流行情况：系统评价和荟萃分析。
Sci Rep. 2022 Jul 15;12(1):12118. doi: 10.1038/s41598-022-16328-7.
8
High discrepancy in thrombotic events in non-small cell lung cancer patients with different genomic alterations.不同基因组改变的非小细胞肺癌患者血栓形成事件存在高度差异。
Transl Lung Cancer Res. 2021 Mar;10(3):1512-1524. doi: 10.21037/tlcr-20-1290.
9
Barriers to making recommendations about medical tests: a qualitative study of European guideline developers.提出医学检查建议的障碍：对欧洲指南制定者的定性研究
BMJ Open. 2016 Sep 16;6(9):e010549. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2015-010549.
10
Androgen deprivation therapy is associated with diabetes: Evidence from meta-analysis.雄激素剥夺疗法与糖尿病有关：荟萃分析证据。
J Diabetes Investig. 2016 Jul;7(4):629-36. doi: 10.1111/jdi.12472. Epub 2016 Feb 8.

本文引用的文献

1
The PRISMA statement for reporting systematic reviews and meta-analyses of studies that evaluate health care interventions: explanation and elaboration.《系统评价与Meta分析优先报告条目声明》：针对评估卫生保健干预措施的研究的报告规范解释与阐述
Ann Intern Med. 2009 Aug 18;151(4):W65-94. doi: 10.7326/0003-4819-151-4-200908180-00136. Epub 2009 Jul 20.
2
Systematic reviews: a cross-sectional study of location and citation counts.系统评价：一项关于位置和被引频次的横断面研究。
BMC Med. 2003 Nov 24;1:2. doi: 10.1186/1741-7015-1-2.
3
Improving the quality of reports of meta-analyses of randomised controlled trials: the QUOROM statement. Quality of Reporting of Meta-analyses.提高随机对照试验的Meta分析报告质量：QUOROM声明。Meta分析报告的质量。
Lancet. 1999 Nov 27;354(9193):1896-900. doi: 10.1016/s0140-6736(99)04149-5.

Methods guide for authors of systematic reviews of medical tests: a collaboration between the Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality (AHRQ) and the Journal of General Internal Medicine.

作者信息

Smetana Gerald W, Umscheid Craig A, Chang Stephanie, Matchar David B

出版信息

J Gen Intern Med. 2012 Jun;27 Suppl 1(Suppl 1):S1-3. doi: 10.1007/s11606-012-2053-1.

DOI:10.1007/s11606-012-2053-1
PMID:22648668
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC3364351/
Abstract
摘要