Yu V Y
Department of Paediatrics, Monash Medical Centre, Clayton, Victoria, Australia.
J Paediatr Child Health. 1990 Oct;26(5):252-6. doi: 10.1111/j.1440-1754.1990.tb01066.x.
The pattern of neonatal bacterial infection, its management and the types of infection control policy were ascertained in 20 neonatal intensive care units (NICU) in Australia by questionnaire survey. Group B Streptococcus and Escherichia coli were the predominant organisms responsible for perinatally acquired infection for which the most common antibiotic combination used was Penicillin and Gentamicin. Staphylococcus epidermidis and aureus (majority Methicillin resistant) were the predominant organisms responsible for nosocomial infection for which the most common antibiotic combination used was Vancomycin and Cefotaxime. A Serratia epidemic was experienced in four NICU. Lumbar and suprapubic punctures were frequently done as part of the diagnostic workup in nosocomial infections but not with perinatally acquired infections. Haematological indices considered useful as a diagnosis aid varied between NICU and acute phase reactants were rarely relied upon for diagnosis or for monitoring treatment response. Granulocyte transfusion and intravenous immunoglobulins were infrequently used in therapy. No consensus was found on infection control policies. Eight NICU required routine gowning on entry, two restricted sibling visiting and four restricted visiting by relatives and friends. Although routine bacteriological surveillance on staff or equipment was uncommon, serial cultures were carried out in infants from the body surface in six NICU and from the endotracheal aspirate in 17 NICU. Antiseptics used with technical procedures included iodine, chlorhexidine and alcohol used singly or in combination. Skin and umbilical cord care also varied between NICU. The literature was reviewed to determine the effectiveness or otherwise of some of the existing policies in the prevention or management of neonatal infection to encourage consensus towards a more rational approach to neonatal infection in Australia.
通过问卷调查确定了澳大利亚20家新生儿重症监护病房(NICU)的新生儿细菌感染模式、管理方式及感染控制政策类型。B组链球菌和大肠杆菌是围产期获得性感染的主要病原体,最常用的抗生素组合是青霉素和庆大霉素。表皮葡萄球菌和金黄色葡萄球菌(大多数耐甲氧西林)是医院感染的主要病原体,最常用的抗生素组合是万古霉素和头孢噻肟。四家NICU发生了沙雷氏菌流行。腰椎穿刺和耻骨上穿刺在医院感染的诊断检查中经常进行,但在围产期获得性感染中则不然。不同NICU认为有助于诊断的血液学指标各不相同,急性期反应物很少用于诊断或监测治疗反应。粒细胞输注和静脉注射免疫球蛋白在治疗中很少使用。在感染控制政策方面未达成共识。八家NICU要求进入时常规穿隔离衣,两家限制兄弟姐妹探视,四家限制亲属和朋友探视。虽然对工作人员或设备进行常规细菌学监测并不常见,但六家NICU对婴儿体表进行了系列培养,17家NICU对气管内吸出物进行了系列培养。技术操作中使用的防腐剂包括单独或联合使用的碘、洗必泰和酒精。不同NICU的皮肤和脐带护理也有所不同。对文献进行了综述,以确定一些现有政策在预防或管理新生儿感染方面的有效性,从而促进澳大利亚在新生儿感染方面达成更合理方法的共识。