Zhao Zhong-xin, Wu Cong, He Min
Department of Neurosurgery, West China Hospital, Sichuan University, Chengdu, Sichuan 610041, PR China.
Clin Neurol Neurosurg. 2012 Sep;114(7):827-32. doi: 10.1016/j.clineuro.2012.05.008. Epub 2012 May 30.
In the last two decades, mild intraoperative hypothermia has become widely accepted as a protective therapy in neurosurgery. However, its effect in intracranial aneurysm surgery remains unclear.
The purpose of this study was to assess the perioperative effects and selected adverse events associated with intraoperative mild hypothermia in aneurysm surgery and to compare those with events in normothermic surgery.
Three literature databases, namely the Cochrane Library, PubMed and EMBASE, were searched for randomised controlled trials (RCTs) of aneurysm surgery that compared intraoperative mild hypothermia and normothermia from January 1965 to August 2010. Three RCTs were identified. We extracted the following information: author names and publication year; clinical outcome (number of deaths and Glasgow outcome scales); perioperative data (number of moderate or severe intraoperative brain swelling occurrences, hypertensive episodes, ruptured or leaking aneurysms, volume of blood loss during surgery, duration of temporary clipping, and number of patients who received protective drugs, who required rewarming and who were intubated); number of adverse events (cerebral infarctions, brain swelling, myocardial ischaemia or infarction, congestive heart failure, meningitis or ventriculitis and pneumonia). Except for author names and publication year, the data were pooled to perform a mean effect size estimate. The effects of intraoperative mild hypothermia were then analysed.
The number of patients requiring rewarming in the mild hypothermia group was significantly greater than in the normothermia group (odds ratio, 33.89; 95% confidence intervals, 3.61-318.36). There were no other statistically significant differences.
Based on available RCTs, especially involving surgery of low-grade aneurysms, intraoperative mild hypothermia showed no advantages compared with normothermia.
在过去二十年中,术中轻度低温已被广泛接受为神经外科的一种保护性治疗方法。然而,其在颅内动脉瘤手术中的效果仍不明确。
本研究的目的是评估术中轻度低温在动脉瘤手术中的围手术期效果和特定不良事件,并将其与常温手术中的事件进行比较。
检索了三个文献数据库,即考克兰图书馆、PubMed和EMBASE,以查找1965年1月至2010年8月期间比较术中轻度低温与常温的动脉瘤手术随机对照试验(RCT)。共识别出三项RCT。我们提取了以下信息:作者姓名和发表年份;临床结果(死亡人数和格拉斯哥预后量表);围手术期数据(术中中度或重度脑肿胀发生次数、高血压发作、动脉瘤破裂或渗漏、手术期间失血量、临时夹闭持续时间以及接受保护药物、需要复温和插管的患者人数);不良事件数量(脑梗死、脑肿胀、心肌缺血或梗死、充血性心力衰竭、脑膜炎或脑室炎以及肺炎)。除作者姓名和发表年份外,对数据进行汇总以进行平均效应量估计。然后分析术中轻度低温的影响。
轻度低温组需要复温的患者人数显著多于常温组(优势比,33.89;95%置信区间,3.61 - 318.36)。没有其他统计学上的显著差异。
基于现有的RCT,特别是涉及低级别动脉瘤手术的RCT,术中轻度低温与常温相比没有优势。