Chowdhury Tumul, Petropolis Andrea, Wilkinson Marshall, Schaller Bernhard, Sandu Nora, Cappellani Ronald B
Department of Anesthesia and Perioperative Medicine, 2nd Floor, Herry Medovy House, 671-William's Avenue, Health Sciences Center, University of Manitoba, Winnipeg, MB, Canada R3E 0Z2.
Neurophysiology, Section Neurosurgery, Health Sciences Center, University of Manitoba, Winnipeg, MB, Canada R3E 0Z2.
Anesthesiol Res Pract. 2014;2014:595837. doi: 10.1155/2014/595837. Epub 2014 Mar 3.
Despite great advancements in the management of aneurysmal subarachnoid hemorrhage (SAH), outcomes following SAH rupture have remained relatively unchanged. In addition, little data exists to guide the anesthetic management of intraoperative aneurysm rupture (IAR), though intraoperative management may have a significant effect on overall neurological outcomes. This review highlights the various controversies related to different anesthetic management related to aneurysm rupture. The first controversy relates to management of preexisting factors that affect risk of IAR. The second controversy relates to diagnostic techniques, particularly neurophysiological monitoring. The third controversy pertains to hemodynamic goals. The neuroprotective effects of various factors, including hypothermia, various anesthetic/pharmacologic agents, and burst suppression, remain poorly understood and have yet to be further elucidated. Different management strategies for IAR during aneurysmal clipping versus coiling also need further attention.
尽管在动脉瘤性蛛网膜下腔出血(SAH)的管理方面取得了巨大进展,但SAH破裂后的预后相对没有变化。此外,虽然术中管理可能对整体神经学预后有重大影响,但几乎没有数据可指导术中动脉瘤破裂(IAR)的麻醉管理。本综述强调了与动脉瘤破裂相关的不同麻醉管理的各种争议。第一个争议涉及影响IAR风险的既往因素的管理。第二个争议涉及诊断技术,特别是神经生理监测。第三个争议涉及血流动力学目标。包括低温、各种麻醉/药物制剂和爆发抑制在内的各种因素的神经保护作用仍知之甚少,有待进一步阐明。在动脉瘤夹闭与栓塞过程中针对IAR的不同管理策略也需要进一步关注。