Doerenkamp-Zbinden Chair of in-vitro Toxicology and Biomedicine, Department of Biology, University of Konstanz, Konstanz, Germany.
Front Biosci (Landmark Ed). 2012 Jun 1;17(7):2442-60. doi: 10.2741/4064.
Development of in vitro systems, such as those based on embryonic stem cell differentiation, depends on the selection of adequate test and training compounds. We recommend the use of two classes of positive controls, the "gold standard compounds" for which developmental neurotoxicity (DNT) has been proven in man, and the "pathway compounds" that are known to disrupt signalling pathways and key processes relevant for neuronal differentiation. We introduce the concept of toxicity endophenotypes (TEP) as changes in neuronal connectivity resulting from exposure to developmental toxicants. Thus, TEPs provide the scientific rationale for modeling DNT with simple in vitro models of key neurodevelopmental events. In this context, we discuss scientific and technical aspects of the test compound selection process. We suggest to include compounds with unspecific toxicity, besides negative control compounds, and we recommend tandem approaches to determine relative toxicities instead of absolute measures. Finally, we discuss how to avoid pitfalls by distinguishing between unspecific forms of cytotoxicity and specific developmental neurotoxicity. A compilation of compound lists corresponding to the above-discussed principles supplement this review.
体外系统的发展,如基于胚胎干细胞分化的系统,取决于合适的测试和训练化合物的选择。我们建议使用两类阳性对照物,即已在人类中证明具有发育神经毒性(DNT)的“金标准化合物”,以及已知会破坏与神经元分化相关的信号通路和关键过程的“通路化合物”。我们引入了毒性表型(TEP)的概念,即由于暴露于发育毒性物质而导致的神经元连接的变化。因此,TEP 为使用关键神经发育事件的简单体外模型来模拟 DNT 提供了科学依据。在这种情况下,我们讨论了测试化合物选择过程的科学和技术方面。我们建议除了阴性对照化合物外,还包括具有非特异性毒性的化合物,并建议采用串联方法来确定相对毒性,而不是绝对措施。最后,我们讨论了如何通过区分非特异性细胞毒性和特定发育神经毒性来避免陷阱。本综述还补充了对应于上述讨论原则的化合物列表。